Cargando…

Comparison of Jet Injection Technique with Conventional Injection Technique in Patients Undergoing Endodontic Therapy

BACKGROUND: In order to reduce the fear and anxiety of injection during root canal procedures, Madajet injection technique was substituted for the first time among the adult patients to obtain its efficacy and to overcome the painful procedure during the conventional syringe technique. AIM: The aim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hameed, Mahaboob Shahul, Kumar, Senthil, Charanya, C., Muthalagu, M., Anitha, M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8092093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33967534
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_466_19
_version_ 1783687589562155008
author Hameed, Mahaboob Shahul
Kumar, Senthil
Charanya, C.
Muthalagu, M.
Anitha, M.
author_facet Hameed, Mahaboob Shahul
Kumar, Senthil
Charanya, C.
Muthalagu, M.
Anitha, M.
author_sort Hameed, Mahaboob Shahul
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In order to reduce the fear and anxiety of injection during root canal procedures, Madajet injection technique was substituted for the first time among the adult patients to obtain its efficacy and to overcome the painful procedure during the conventional syringe technique. AIM: The aim of this study is to compare the clinical efficacy and level of patient acceptance of jet injections with conventional syringe technique in patients with symptomatic pulpitis. METHODOLOGY: Seventy patients were randomly divided into needleless pressure injection technique using Madajet XL and conventional syringe technique. The onset of anesthesia was evaluated using the electric pulp tester, and the pain was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale scoring criteria. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The obtained data were tabulated and subjected to the statistical analysis using the Chi-square test. RESULTS: Needleless pressure injection technique (Madajet XL) proves to be effective in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis during endodontic procedure. CONCLUSION: It can be concluded that the needle-less pressure injection technique (Madajet XL) promises to be a viable mode of pain control during endodontic procedures as it converts the solution to a tiny droplet which is then carried by the myelin sheath.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8092093
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80920932021-05-06 Comparison of Jet Injection Technique with Conventional Injection Technique in Patients Undergoing Endodontic Therapy Hameed, Mahaboob Shahul Kumar, Senthil Charanya, C. Muthalagu, M. Anitha, M. Contemp Clin Dent Original Article BACKGROUND: In order to reduce the fear and anxiety of injection during root canal procedures, Madajet injection technique was substituted for the first time among the adult patients to obtain its efficacy and to overcome the painful procedure during the conventional syringe technique. AIM: The aim of this study is to compare the clinical efficacy and level of patient acceptance of jet injections with conventional syringe technique in patients with symptomatic pulpitis. METHODOLOGY: Seventy patients were randomly divided into needleless pressure injection technique using Madajet XL and conventional syringe technique. The onset of anesthesia was evaluated using the electric pulp tester, and the pain was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale scoring criteria. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The obtained data were tabulated and subjected to the statistical analysis using the Chi-square test. RESULTS: Needleless pressure injection technique (Madajet XL) proves to be effective in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis during endodontic procedure. CONCLUSION: It can be concluded that the needle-less pressure injection technique (Madajet XL) promises to be a viable mode of pain control during endodontic procedures as it converts the solution to a tiny droplet which is then carried by the myelin sheath. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021 2021-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8092093/ /pubmed/33967534 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_466_19 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Contemporary Clinical Dentistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Hameed, Mahaboob Shahul
Kumar, Senthil
Charanya, C.
Muthalagu, M.
Anitha, M.
Comparison of Jet Injection Technique with Conventional Injection Technique in Patients Undergoing Endodontic Therapy
title Comparison of Jet Injection Technique with Conventional Injection Technique in Patients Undergoing Endodontic Therapy
title_full Comparison of Jet Injection Technique with Conventional Injection Technique in Patients Undergoing Endodontic Therapy
title_fullStr Comparison of Jet Injection Technique with Conventional Injection Technique in Patients Undergoing Endodontic Therapy
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Jet Injection Technique with Conventional Injection Technique in Patients Undergoing Endodontic Therapy
title_short Comparison of Jet Injection Technique with Conventional Injection Technique in Patients Undergoing Endodontic Therapy
title_sort comparison of jet injection technique with conventional injection technique in patients undergoing endodontic therapy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8092093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33967534
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_466_19
work_keys_str_mv AT hameedmahaboobshahul comparisonofjetinjectiontechniquewithconventionalinjectiontechniqueinpatientsundergoingendodontictherapy
AT kumarsenthil comparisonofjetinjectiontechniquewithconventionalinjectiontechniqueinpatientsundergoingendodontictherapy
AT charanyac comparisonofjetinjectiontechniquewithconventionalinjectiontechniqueinpatientsundergoingendodontictherapy
AT muthalagum comparisonofjetinjectiontechniquewithconventionalinjectiontechniqueinpatientsundergoingendodontictherapy
AT anitham comparisonofjetinjectiontechniquewithconventionalinjectiontechniqueinpatientsundergoingendodontictherapy