Cargando…
Comparison of Jet Injection Technique with Conventional Injection Technique in Patients Undergoing Endodontic Therapy
BACKGROUND: In order to reduce the fear and anxiety of injection during root canal procedures, Madajet injection technique was substituted for the first time among the adult patients to obtain its efficacy and to overcome the painful procedure during the conventional syringe technique. AIM: The aim...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8092093/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33967534 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_466_19 |
_version_ | 1783687589562155008 |
---|---|
author | Hameed, Mahaboob Shahul Kumar, Senthil Charanya, C. Muthalagu, M. Anitha, M. |
author_facet | Hameed, Mahaboob Shahul Kumar, Senthil Charanya, C. Muthalagu, M. Anitha, M. |
author_sort | Hameed, Mahaboob Shahul |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In order to reduce the fear and anxiety of injection during root canal procedures, Madajet injection technique was substituted for the first time among the adult patients to obtain its efficacy and to overcome the painful procedure during the conventional syringe technique. AIM: The aim of this study is to compare the clinical efficacy and level of patient acceptance of jet injections with conventional syringe technique in patients with symptomatic pulpitis. METHODOLOGY: Seventy patients were randomly divided into needleless pressure injection technique using Madajet XL and conventional syringe technique. The onset of anesthesia was evaluated using the electric pulp tester, and the pain was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale scoring criteria. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The obtained data were tabulated and subjected to the statistical analysis using the Chi-square test. RESULTS: Needleless pressure injection technique (Madajet XL) proves to be effective in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis during endodontic procedure. CONCLUSION: It can be concluded that the needle-less pressure injection technique (Madajet XL) promises to be a viable mode of pain control during endodontic procedures as it converts the solution to a tiny droplet which is then carried by the myelin sheath. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8092093 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80920932021-05-06 Comparison of Jet Injection Technique with Conventional Injection Technique in Patients Undergoing Endodontic Therapy Hameed, Mahaboob Shahul Kumar, Senthil Charanya, C. Muthalagu, M. Anitha, M. Contemp Clin Dent Original Article BACKGROUND: In order to reduce the fear and anxiety of injection during root canal procedures, Madajet injection technique was substituted for the first time among the adult patients to obtain its efficacy and to overcome the painful procedure during the conventional syringe technique. AIM: The aim of this study is to compare the clinical efficacy and level of patient acceptance of jet injections with conventional syringe technique in patients with symptomatic pulpitis. METHODOLOGY: Seventy patients were randomly divided into needleless pressure injection technique using Madajet XL and conventional syringe technique. The onset of anesthesia was evaluated using the electric pulp tester, and the pain was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale scoring criteria. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The obtained data were tabulated and subjected to the statistical analysis using the Chi-square test. RESULTS: Needleless pressure injection technique (Madajet XL) proves to be effective in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis during endodontic procedure. CONCLUSION: It can be concluded that the needle-less pressure injection technique (Madajet XL) promises to be a viable mode of pain control during endodontic procedures as it converts the solution to a tiny droplet which is then carried by the myelin sheath. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021 2021-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8092093/ /pubmed/33967534 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_466_19 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Contemporary Clinical Dentistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Hameed, Mahaboob Shahul Kumar, Senthil Charanya, C. Muthalagu, M. Anitha, M. Comparison of Jet Injection Technique with Conventional Injection Technique in Patients Undergoing Endodontic Therapy |
title | Comparison of Jet Injection Technique with Conventional Injection Technique in Patients Undergoing Endodontic Therapy |
title_full | Comparison of Jet Injection Technique with Conventional Injection Technique in Patients Undergoing Endodontic Therapy |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Jet Injection Technique with Conventional Injection Technique in Patients Undergoing Endodontic Therapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Jet Injection Technique with Conventional Injection Technique in Patients Undergoing Endodontic Therapy |
title_short | Comparison of Jet Injection Technique with Conventional Injection Technique in Patients Undergoing Endodontic Therapy |
title_sort | comparison of jet injection technique with conventional injection technique in patients undergoing endodontic therapy |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8092093/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33967534 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_466_19 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hameedmahaboobshahul comparisonofjetinjectiontechniquewithconventionalinjectiontechniqueinpatientsundergoingendodontictherapy AT kumarsenthil comparisonofjetinjectiontechniquewithconventionalinjectiontechniqueinpatientsundergoingendodontictherapy AT charanyac comparisonofjetinjectiontechniquewithconventionalinjectiontechniqueinpatientsundergoingendodontictherapy AT muthalagum comparisonofjetinjectiontechniquewithconventionalinjectiontechniqueinpatientsundergoingendodontictherapy AT anitham comparisonofjetinjectiontechniquewithconventionalinjectiontechniqueinpatientsundergoingendodontictherapy |