Cargando…

Evaluation of Postoperative Pain after Pulpectomy using Different File Systems in Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this systematic review was to compare the incidence and intensity of postoperative pain after pulpectomy using different instrumentations in primary teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An extensive literature search in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Science Direct, LILAC, SIGLE, and G...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lakshmanan, Lakshimi, Somasundaram, Sujatha, Jeevanandan, Ganesh, Subramanian, EMG
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8092099/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33967530
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_561_20
_version_ 1783687591024918528
author Lakshmanan, Lakshimi
Somasundaram, Sujatha
Jeevanandan, Ganesh
Subramanian, EMG
author_facet Lakshmanan, Lakshimi
Somasundaram, Sujatha
Jeevanandan, Ganesh
Subramanian, EMG
author_sort Lakshmanan, Lakshimi
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this systematic review was to compare the incidence and intensity of postoperative pain after pulpectomy using different instrumentations in primary teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An extensive literature search in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Science Direct, LILAC, SIGLE, and Google Scholar was performed to identify English language articles with human subjects that evaluated the effects of different instruments on postoperative pain after pulpectomy. RESULTS: The search retrieved 187 references. After screening of the abstracts and articles, based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of three articles were included in the systematic review. Of the three included studies, two of them had a moderate risk of bias and one showed a high risk of bias. CONCLUSION: The use of rotary instruments contributed to a lower incidence and intensity of postoperative pain than did the hand instruments in all the three studies. More high-quality randomized clinical trials are needed in this field in future studies to support the evidence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8092099
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80920992021-05-06 Evaluation of Postoperative Pain after Pulpectomy using Different File Systems in Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review Lakshmanan, Lakshimi Somasundaram, Sujatha Jeevanandan, Ganesh Subramanian, EMG Contemp Clin Dent Systematic Review OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this systematic review was to compare the incidence and intensity of postoperative pain after pulpectomy using different instrumentations in primary teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An extensive literature search in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Science Direct, LILAC, SIGLE, and Google Scholar was performed to identify English language articles with human subjects that evaluated the effects of different instruments on postoperative pain after pulpectomy. RESULTS: The search retrieved 187 references. After screening of the abstracts and articles, based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of three articles were included in the systematic review. Of the three included studies, two of them had a moderate risk of bias and one showed a high risk of bias. CONCLUSION: The use of rotary instruments contributed to a lower incidence and intensity of postoperative pain than did the hand instruments in all the three studies. More high-quality randomized clinical trials are needed in this field in future studies to support the evidence. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021 2021-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8092099/ /pubmed/33967530 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_561_20 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Contemporary Clinical Dentistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Lakshmanan, Lakshimi
Somasundaram, Sujatha
Jeevanandan, Ganesh
Subramanian, EMG
Evaluation of Postoperative Pain after Pulpectomy using Different File Systems in Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review
title Evaluation of Postoperative Pain after Pulpectomy using Different File Systems in Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review
title_full Evaluation of Postoperative Pain after Pulpectomy using Different File Systems in Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Evaluation of Postoperative Pain after Pulpectomy using Different File Systems in Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Postoperative Pain after Pulpectomy using Different File Systems in Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review
title_short Evaluation of Postoperative Pain after Pulpectomy using Different File Systems in Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review
title_sort evaluation of postoperative pain after pulpectomy using different file systems in primary teeth: a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8092099/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33967530
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_561_20
work_keys_str_mv AT lakshmananlakshimi evaluationofpostoperativepainafterpulpectomyusingdifferentfilesystemsinprimaryteethasystematicreview
AT somasundaramsujatha evaluationofpostoperativepainafterpulpectomyusingdifferentfilesystemsinprimaryteethasystematicreview
AT jeevanandanganesh evaluationofpostoperativepainafterpulpectomyusingdifferentfilesystemsinprimaryteethasystematicreview
AT subramanianemg evaluationofpostoperativepainafterpulpectomyusingdifferentfilesystemsinprimaryteethasystematicreview