Cargando…
Evaluation of Postoperative Pain after Pulpectomy using Different File Systems in Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this systematic review was to compare the incidence and intensity of postoperative pain after pulpectomy using different instrumentations in primary teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An extensive literature search in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Science Direct, LILAC, SIGLE, and G...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8092099/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33967530 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_561_20 |
_version_ | 1783687591024918528 |
---|---|
author | Lakshmanan, Lakshimi Somasundaram, Sujatha Jeevanandan, Ganesh Subramanian, EMG |
author_facet | Lakshmanan, Lakshimi Somasundaram, Sujatha Jeevanandan, Ganesh Subramanian, EMG |
author_sort | Lakshmanan, Lakshimi |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this systematic review was to compare the incidence and intensity of postoperative pain after pulpectomy using different instrumentations in primary teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An extensive literature search in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Science Direct, LILAC, SIGLE, and Google Scholar was performed to identify English language articles with human subjects that evaluated the effects of different instruments on postoperative pain after pulpectomy. RESULTS: The search retrieved 187 references. After screening of the abstracts and articles, based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of three articles were included in the systematic review. Of the three included studies, two of them had a moderate risk of bias and one showed a high risk of bias. CONCLUSION: The use of rotary instruments contributed to a lower incidence and intensity of postoperative pain than did the hand instruments in all the three studies. More high-quality randomized clinical trials are needed in this field in future studies to support the evidence. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8092099 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80920992021-05-06 Evaluation of Postoperative Pain after Pulpectomy using Different File Systems in Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review Lakshmanan, Lakshimi Somasundaram, Sujatha Jeevanandan, Ganesh Subramanian, EMG Contemp Clin Dent Systematic Review OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this systematic review was to compare the incidence and intensity of postoperative pain after pulpectomy using different instrumentations in primary teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An extensive literature search in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Science Direct, LILAC, SIGLE, and Google Scholar was performed to identify English language articles with human subjects that evaluated the effects of different instruments on postoperative pain after pulpectomy. RESULTS: The search retrieved 187 references. After screening of the abstracts and articles, based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of three articles were included in the systematic review. Of the three included studies, two of them had a moderate risk of bias and one showed a high risk of bias. CONCLUSION: The use of rotary instruments contributed to a lower incidence and intensity of postoperative pain than did the hand instruments in all the three studies. More high-quality randomized clinical trials are needed in this field in future studies to support the evidence. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021 2021-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8092099/ /pubmed/33967530 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_561_20 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Contemporary Clinical Dentistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Lakshmanan, Lakshimi Somasundaram, Sujatha Jeevanandan, Ganesh Subramanian, EMG Evaluation of Postoperative Pain after Pulpectomy using Different File Systems in Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review |
title | Evaluation of Postoperative Pain after Pulpectomy using Different File Systems in Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Evaluation of Postoperative Pain after Pulpectomy using Different File Systems in Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Postoperative Pain after Pulpectomy using Different File Systems in Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Postoperative Pain after Pulpectomy using Different File Systems in Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Evaluation of Postoperative Pain after Pulpectomy using Different File Systems in Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | evaluation of postoperative pain after pulpectomy using different file systems in primary teeth: a systematic review |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8092099/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33967530 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_561_20 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lakshmananlakshimi evaluationofpostoperativepainafterpulpectomyusingdifferentfilesystemsinprimaryteethasystematicreview AT somasundaramsujatha evaluationofpostoperativepainafterpulpectomyusingdifferentfilesystemsinprimaryteethasystematicreview AT jeevanandanganesh evaluationofpostoperativepainafterpulpectomyusingdifferentfilesystemsinprimaryteethasystematicreview AT subramanianemg evaluationofpostoperativepainafterpulpectomyusingdifferentfilesystemsinprimaryteethasystematicreview |