Cargando…

Evaluation of the Effect of Storage Methods on Fecal, Saliva, and Skin Microbiome Composition

As the number of human microbiome studies expand, it is increasingly important to identify cost-effective, practical preservatives that allow for room temperature sample storage. Here, we reanalyzed 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing data from a large sample storage study published in 2016 and perfor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marotz, Clarisse, Cavagnero, Kellen J., Song, Se Jin, McDonald, Daniel, Wandro, Stephen, Humphrey, Greg, Bryant, MacKenzie, Ackermann, Gail, Diaz, Edgar, Knight, Rob
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Microbiology 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8092129/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33906915
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.01329-20
_version_ 1783687596750143488
author Marotz, Clarisse
Cavagnero, Kellen J.
Song, Se Jin
McDonald, Daniel
Wandro, Stephen
Humphrey, Greg
Bryant, MacKenzie
Ackermann, Gail
Diaz, Edgar
Knight, Rob
author_facet Marotz, Clarisse
Cavagnero, Kellen J.
Song, Se Jin
McDonald, Daniel
Wandro, Stephen
Humphrey, Greg
Bryant, MacKenzie
Ackermann, Gail
Diaz, Edgar
Knight, Rob
author_sort Marotz, Clarisse
collection PubMed
description As the number of human microbiome studies expand, it is increasingly important to identify cost-effective, practical preservatives that allow for room temperature sample storage. Here, we reanalyzed 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing data from a large sample storage study published in 2016 and performed shotgun metagenomic sequencing on remnant DNA from this experiment. Both results support the initial findings that 95% ethanol, a nontoxic, cost-effective preservative, is effective at preserving samples at room temperature for weeks. We expanded on this analysis by collecting a new set of fecal, saliva, and skin samples to determine the optimal ratio of 95% ethanol to sample. We identified optimal collection protocols for fecal samples (storing a fecal swab in 95% ethanol) and saliva samples (storing unstimulated saliva in 95% ethanol at a ratio of 1:2). Storing skin swabs in 95% ethanol reduced microbial biomass and disrupted community composition, highlighting the difficulties of low biomass sample preservation. The results from this study identify practical solutions for large-scale analyses of fecal and oral microbial communities. IMPORTANCE Expanding our knowledge of microbial communities across diverse environments includes collecting samples in places far from the laboratory. Identifying cost-effective preservatives that will enable room temperature storage of microbial communities for sequencing analysis is crucial to enabling microbiome analyses across diverse populations. Here, we validate findings that 95% ethanol efficiently preserves microbial composition at room temperature for weeks. We also identified the optimal ratio of 95% ethanol to sample for stool and saliva to preserve both microbial load and composition. These results provide rationale for an accessible, nontoxic, cost-effective solution that will enable crowdsourcing microbiome studies, such as The Microsetta Initiative, and lower the barrier for collecting diverse samples.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8092129
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher American Society for Microbiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80921292021-05-10 Evaluation of the Effect of Storage Methods on Fecal, Saliva, and Skin Microbiome Composition Marotz, Clarisse Cavagnero, Kellen J. Song, Se Jin McDonald, Daniel Wandro, Stephen Humphrey, Greg Bryant, MacKenzie Ackermann, Gail Diaz, Edgar Knight, Rob mSystems Research Article As the number of human microbiome studies expand, it is increasingly important to identify cost-effective, practical preservatives that allow for room temperature sample storage. Here, we reanalyzed 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing data from a large sample storage study published in 2016 and performed shotgun metagenomic sequencing on remnant DNA from this experiment. Both results support the initial findings that 95% ethanol, a nontoxic, cost-effective preservative, is effective at preserving samples at room temperature for weeks. We expanded on this analysis by collecting a new set of fecal, saliva, and skin samples to determine the optimal ratio of 95% ethanol to sample. We identified optimal collection protocols for fecal samples (storing a fecal swab in 95% ethanol) and saliva samples (storing unstimulated saliva in 95% ethanol at a ratio of 1:2). Storing skin swabs in 95% ethanol reduced microbial biomass and disrupted community composition, highlighting the difficulties of low biomass sample preservation. The results from this study identify practical solutions for large-scale analyses of fecal and oral microbial communities. IMPORTANCE Expanding our knowledge of microbial communities across diverse environments includes collecting samples in places far from the laboratory. Identifying cost-effective preservatives that will enable room temperature storage of microbial communities for sequencing analysis is crucial to enabling microbiome analyses across diverse populations. Here, we validate findings that 95% ethanol efficiently preserves microbial composition at room temperature for weeks. We also identified the optimal ratio of 95% ethanol to sample for stool and saliva to preserve both microbial load and composition. These results provide rationale for an accessible, nontoxic, cost-effective solution that will enable crowdsourcing microbiome studies, such as The Microsetta Initiative, and lower the barrier for collecting diverse samples. American Society for Microbiology 2021-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8092129/ /pubmed/33906915 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.01329-20 Text en Copyright © 2021 Marotz et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Article
Marotz, Clarisse
Cavagnero, Kellen J.
Song, Se Jin
McDonald, Daniel
Wandro, Stephen
Humphrey, Greg
Bryant, MacKenzie
Ackermann, Gail
Diaz, Edgar
Knight, Rob
Evaluation of the Effect of Storage Methods on Fecal, Saliva, and Skin Microbiome Composition
title Evaluation of the Effect of Storage Methods on Fecal, Saliva, and Skin Microbiome Composition
title_full Evaluation of the Effect of Storage Methods on Fecal, Saliva, and Skin Microbiome Composition
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Effect of Storage Methods on Fecal, Saliva, and Skin Microbiome Composition
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Effect of Storage Methods on Fecal, Saliva, and Skin Microbiome Composition
title_short Evaluation of the Effect of Storage Methods on Fecal, Saliva, and Skin Microbiome Composition
title_sort evaluation of the effect of storage methods on fecal, saliva, and skin microbiome composition
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8092129/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33906915
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.01329-20
work_keys_str_mv AT marotzclarisse evaluationoftheeffectofstoragemethodsonfecalsalivaandskinmicrobiomecomposition
AT cavagnerokellenj evaluationoftheeffectofstoragemethodsonfecalsalivaandskinmicrobiomecomposition
AT songsejin evaluationoftheeffectofstoragemethodsonfecalsalivaandskinmicrobiomecomposition
AT mcdonalddaniel evaluationoftheeffectofstoragemethodsonfecalsalivaandskinmicrobiomecomposition
AT wandrostephen evaluationoftheeffectofstoragemethodsonfecalsalivaandskinmicrobiomecomposition
AT humphreygreg evaluationoftheeffectofstoragemethodsonfecalsalivaandskinmicrobiomecomposition
AT bryantmackenzie evaluationoftheeffectofstoragemethodsonfecalsalivaandskinmicrobiomecomposition
AT ackermanngail evaluationoftheeffectofstoragemethodsonfecalsalivaandskinmicrobiomecomposition
AT diazedgar evaluationoftheeffectofstoragemethodsonfecalsalivaandskinmicrobiomecomposition
AT knightrob evaluationoftheeffectofstoragemethodsonfecalsalivaandskinmicrobiomecomposition