Cargando…
Evaluation of the Effect of Storage Methods on Fecal, Saliva, and Skin Microbiome Composition
As the number of human microbiome studies expand, it is increasingly important to identify cost-effective, practical preservatives that allow for room temperature sample storage. Here, we reanalyzed 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing data from a large sample storage study published in 2016 and perfor...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Society for Microbiology
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8092129/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33906915 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.01329-20 |
_version_ | 1783687596750143488 |
---|---|
author | Marotz, Clarisse Cavagnero, Kellen J. Song, Se Jin McDonald, Daniel Wandro, Stephen Humphrey, Greg Bryant, MacKenzie Ackermann, Gail Diaz, Edgar Knight, Rob |
author_facet | Marotz, Clarisse Cavagnero, Kellen J. Song, Se Jin McDonald, Daniel Wandro, Stephen Humphrey, Greg Bryant, MacKenzie Ackermann, Gail Diaz, Edgar Knight, Rob |
author_sort | Marotz, Clarisse |
collection | PubMed |
description | As the number of human microbiome studies expand, it is increasingly important to identify cost-effective, practical preservatives that allow for room temperature sample storage. Here, we reanalyzed 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing data from a large sample storage study published in 2016 and performed shotgun metagenomic sequencing on remnant DNA from this experiment. Both results support the initial findings that 95% ethanol, a nontoxic, cost-effective preservative, is effective at preserving samples at room temperature for weeks. We expanded on this analysis by collecting a new set of fecal, saliva, and skin samples to determine the optimal ratio of 95% ethanol to sample. We identified optimal collection protocols for fecal samples (storing a fecal swab in 95% ethanol) and saliva samples (storing unstimulated saliva in 95% ethanol at a ratio of 1:2). Storing skin swabs in 95% ethanol reduced microbial biomass and disrupted community composition, highlighting the difficulties of low biomass sample preservation. The results from this study identify practical solutions for large-scale analyses of fecal and oral microbial communities. IMPORTANCE Expanding our knowledge of microbial communities across diverse environments includes collecting samples in places far from the laboratory. Identifying cost-effective preservatives that will enable room temperature storage of microbial communities for sequencing analysis is crucial to enabling microbiome analyses across diverse populations. Here, we validate findings that 95% ethanol efficiently preserves microbial composition at room temperature for weeks. We also identified the optimal ratio of 95% ethanol to sample for stool and saliva to preserve both microbial load and composition. These results provide rationale for an accessible, nontoxic, cost-effective solution that will enable crowdsourcing microbiome studies, such as The Microsetta Initiative, and lower the barrier for collecting diverse samples. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8092129 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | American Society for Microbiology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80921292021-05-10 Evaluation of the Effect of Storage Methods on Fecal, Saliva, and Skin Microbiome Composition Marotz, Clarisse Cavagnero, Kellen J. Song, Se Jin McDonald, Daniel Wandro, Stephen Humphrey, Greg Bryant, MacKenzie Ackermann, Gail Diaz, Edgar Knight, Rob mSystems Research Article As the number of human microbiome studies expand, it is increasingly important to identify cost-effective, practical preservatives that allow for room temperature sample storage. Here, we reanalyzed 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing data from a large sample storage study published in 2016 and performed shotgun metagenomic sequencing on remnant DNA from this experiment. Both results support the initial findings that 95% ethanol, a nontoxic, cost-effective preservative, is effective at preserving samples at room temperature for weeks. We expanded on this analysis by collecting a new set of fecal, saliva, and skin samples to determine the optimal ratio of 95% ethanol to sample. We identified optimal collection protocols for fecal samples (storing a fecal swab in 95% ethanol) and saliva samples (storing unstimulated saliva in 95% ethanol at a ratio of 1:2). Storing skin swabs in 95% ethanol reduced microbial biomass and disrupted community composition, highlighting the difficulties of low biomass sample preservation. The results from this study identify practical solutions for large-scale analyses of fecal and oral microbial communities. IMPORTANCE Expanding our knowledge of microbial communities across diverse environments includes collecting samples in places far from the laboratory. Identifying cost-effective preservatives that will enable room temperature storage of microbial communities for sequencing analysis is crucial to enabling microbiome analyses across diverse populations. Here, we validate findings that 95% ethanol efficiently preserves microbial composition at room temperature for weeks. We also identified the optimal ratio of 95% ethanol to sample for stool and saliva to preserve both microbial load and composition. These results provide rationale for an accessible, nontoxic, cost-effective solution that will enable crowdsourcing microbiome studies, such as The Microsetta Initiative, and lower the barrier for collecting diverse samples. American Society for Microbiology 2021-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8092129/ /pubmed/33906915 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.01329-20 Text en Copyright © 2021 Marotz et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Article Marotz, Clarisse Cavagnero, Kellen J. Song, Se Jin McDonald, Daniel Wandro, Stephen Humphrey, Greg Bryant, MacKenzie Ackermann, Gail Diaz, Edgar Knight, Rob Evaluation of the Effect of Storage Methods on Fecal, Saliva, and Skin Microbiome Composition |
title | Evaluation of the Effect of Storage Methods on Fecal, Saliva, and Skin Microbiome Composition |
title_full | Evaluation of the Effect of Storage Methods on Fecal, Saliva, and Skin Microbiome Composition |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the Effect of Storage Methods on Fecal, Saliva, and Skin Microbiome Composition |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the Effect of Storage Methods on Fecal, Saliva, and Skin Microbiome Composition |
title_short | Evaluation of the Effect of Storage Methods on Fecal, Saliva, and Skin Microbiome Composition |
title_sort | evaluation of the effect of storage methods on fecal, saliva, and skin microbiome composition |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8092129/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33906915 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.01329-20 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marotzclarisse evaluationoftheeffectofstoragemethodsonfecalsalivaandskinmicrobiomecomposition AT cavagnerokellenj evaluationoftheeffectofstoragemethodsonfecalsalivaandskinmicrobiomecomposition AT songsejin evaluationoftheeffectofstoragemethodsonfecalsalivaandskinmicrobiomecomposition AT mcdonalddaniel evaluationoftheeffectofstoragemethodsonfecalsalivaandskinmicrobiomecomposition AT wandrostephen evaluationoftheeffectofstoragemethodsonfecalsalivaandskinmicrobiomecomposition AT humphreygreg evaluationoftheeffectofstoragemethodsonfecalsalivaandskinmicrobiomecomposition AT bryantmackenzie evaluationoftheeffectofstoragemethodsonfecalsalivaandskinmicrobiomecomposition AT ackermanngail evaluationoftheeffectofstoragemethodsonfecalsalivaandskinmicrobiomecomposition AT diazedgar evaluationoftheeffectofstoragemethodsonfecalsalivaandskinmicrobiomecomposition AT knightrob evaluationoftheeffectofstoragemethodsonfecalsalivaandskinmicrobiomecomposition |