Cargando…

In Vivo Competitions between Fibrobacter succinogenes, Ruminococcus flavefaciens, and Ruminoccus albus in a Gnotobiotic Sheep Model Revealed by Multi-Omic Analyses

Fibrobacter succinogenes, Ruminococcus albus, and Ruminococcus flavefaciens are the three predominant cellulolytic bacterial species found in the rumen. In vitro studies have shown that these species compete for adherence to, and growth upon, cellulosic biomass. Yet their molecular interactions in v...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yeoman, Carl J., Fields, Christopher J., Lepercq, Pascale, Ruiz, Philippe, Forano, Evelyne, White, Bryan A., Mosoni, Pascale
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Microbiology 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8092306/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33658330
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mBio.03533-20
_version_ 1783687635277971456
author Yeoman, Carl J.
Fields, Christopher J.
Lepercq, Pascale
Ruiz, Philippe
Forano, Evelyne
White, Bryan A.
Mosoni, Pascale
author_facet Yeoman, Carl J.
Fields, Christopher J.
Lepercq, Pascale
Ruiz, Philippe
Forano, Evelyne
White, Bryan A.
Mosoni, Pascale
author_sort Yeoman, Carl J.
collection PubMed
description Fibrobacter succinogenes, Ruminococcus albus, and Ruminococcus flavefaciens are the three predominant cellulolytic bacterial species found in the rumen. In vitro studies have shown that these species compete for adherence to, and growth upon, cellulosic biomass. Yet their molecular interactions in vivo have not heretofore been examined. Gnotobiotically raised lambs harboring a 17-h-old immature microbiota devoid of culturable cellulolytic bacteria and methanogens were inoculated first with F. succinogenes S85 and Methanobrevibacter sp. strain 87.7, and 5 months later, the lambs were inoculated with R. albus 8 and R. flavefaciens FD-1. Longitudinal samples were collected and profiled for population dynamics, gene expression, fibrolytic enzyme activity, in sacco fibrolysis, and metabolite profiling. Quantitative PCR, metagenome and metatranscriptome data show that F. succinogenes establishes at high levels initially but is gradually outcompeted following the introduction of the ruminococci. This shift resulted in an increase in carboxymethyl cellulase (CMCase) and xylanase activities but not in greater fibrolysis, suggesting that F. succinogenes and ruminococci deploy different but equally effective means to degrade plant cell walls. Expression profiles showed that F. succinogenes relied upon outer membrane vesicles and a diverse repertoire of CAZymes, while R. albus and R. flavefaciens preferred type IV pili and either CBM37-harboring or cellulosomal carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes), respectively. The changes in cellulolytics also affected the rumen metabolome, including an increase in acetate and butyrate at the expense of propionate. In conclusion, this study provides the first demonstration of in vivo competition between the three predominant cellulolytic bacteria and provides insight on the influence of these ecological interactions on rumen fibrolytic function and metabolomic response.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8092306
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher American Society for Microbiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80923062021-05-04 In Vivo Competitions between Fibrobacter succinogenes, Ruminococcus flavefaciens, and Ruminoccus albus in a Gnotobiotic Sheep Model Revealed by Multi-Omic Analyses Yeoman, Carl J. Fields, Christopher J. Lepercq, Pascale Ruiz, Philippe Forano, Evelyne White, Bryan A. Mosoni, Pascale mBio Research Article Fibrobacter succinogenes, Ruminococcus albus, and Ruminococcus flavefaciens are the three predominant cellulolytic bacterial species found in the rumen. In vitro studies have shown that these species compete for adherence to, and growth upon, cellulosic biomass. Yet their molecular interactions in vivo have not heretofore been examined. Gnotobiotically raised lambs harboring a 17-h-old immature microbiota devoid of culturable cellulolytic bacteria and methanogens were inoculated first with F. succinogenes S85 and Methanobrevibacter sp. strain 87.7, and 5 months later, the lambs were inoculated with R. albus 8 and R. flavefaciens FD-1. Longitudinal samples were collected and profiled for population dynamics, gene expression, fibrolytic enzyme activity, in sacco fibrolysis, and metabolite profiling. Quantitative PCR, metagenome and metatranscriptome data show that F. succinogenes establishes at high levels initially but is gradually outcompeted following the introduction of the ruminococci. This shift resulted in an increase in carboxymethyl cellulase (CMCase) and xylanase activities but not in greater fibrolysis, suggesting that F. succinogenes and ruminococci deploy different but equally effective means to degrade plant cell walls. Expression profiles showed that F. succinogenes relied upon outer membrane vesicles and a diverse repertoire of CAZymes, while R. albus and R. flavefaciens preferred type IV pili and either CBM37-harboring or cellulosomal carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes), respectively. The changes in cellulolytics also affected the rumen metabolome, including an increase in acetate and butyrate at the expense of propionate. In conclusion, this study provides the first demonstration of in vivo competition between the three predominant cellulolytic bacteria and provides insight on the influence of these ecological interactions on rumen fibrolytic function and metabolomic response. American Society for Microbiology 2021-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8092306/ /pubmed/33658330 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mBio.03533-20 Text en Copyright © 2021 Yeoman et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Article
Yeoman, Carl J.
Fields, Christopher J.
Lepercq, Pascale
Ruiz, Philippe
Forano, Evelyne
White, Bryan A.
Mosoni, Pascale
In Vivo Competitions between Fibrobacter succinogenes, Ruminococcus flavefaciens, and Ruminoccus albus in a Gnotobiotic Sheep Model Revealed by Multi-Omic Analyses
title In Vivo Competitions between Fibrobacter succinogenes, Ruminococcus flavefaciens, and Ruminoccus albus in a Gnotobiotic Sheep Model Revealed by Multi-Omic Analyses
title_full In Vivo Competitions between Fibrobacter succinogenes, Ruminococcus flavefaciens, and Ruminoccus albus in a Gnotobiotic Sheep Model Revealed by Multi-Omic Analyses
title_fullStr In Vivo Competitions between Fibrobacter succinogenes, Ruminococcus flavefaciens, and Ruminoccus albus in a Gnotobiotic Sheep Model Revealed by Multi-Omic Analyses
title_full_unstemmed In Vivo Competitions between Fibrobacter succinogenes, Ruminococcus flavefaciens, and Ruminoccus albus in a Gnotobiotic Sheep Model Revealed by Multi-Omic Analyses
title_short In Vivo Competitions between Fibrobacter succinogenes, Ruminococcus flavefaciens, and Ruminoccus albus in a Gnotobiotic Sheep Model Revealed by Multi-Omic Analyses
title_sort in vivo competitions between fibrobacter succinogenes, ruminococcus flavefaciens, and ruminoccus albus in a gnotobiotic sheep model revealed by multi-omic analyses
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8092306/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33658330
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mBio.03533-20
work_keys_str_mv AT yeomancarlj invivocompetitionsbetweenfibrobactersuccinogenesruminococcusflavefaciensandruminoccusalbusinagnotobioticsheepmodelrevealedbymultiomicanalyses
AT fieldschristopherj invivocompetitionsbetweenfibrobactersuccinogenesruminococcusflavefaciensandruminoccusalbusinagnotobioticsheepmodelrevealedbymultiomicanalyses
AT lepercqpascale invivocompetitionsbetweenfibrobactersuccinogenesruminococcusflavefaciensandruminoccusalbusinagnotobioticsheepmodelrevealedbymultiomicanalyses
AT ruizphilippe invivocompetitionsbetweenfibrobactersuccinogenesruminococcusflavefaciensandruminoccusalbusinagnotobioticsheepmodelrevealedbymultiomicanalyses
AT foranoevelyne invivocompetitionsbetweenfibrobactersuccinogenesruminococcusflavefaciensandruminoccusalbusinagnotobioticsheepmodelrevealedbymultiomicanalyses
AT whitebryana invivocompetitionsbetweenfibrobactersuccinogenesruminococcusflavefaciensandruminoccusalbusinagnotobioticsheepmodelrevealedbymultiomicanalyses
AT mosonipascale invivocompetitionsbetweenfibrobactersuccinogenesruminococcusflavefaciensandruminoccusalbusinagnotobioticsheepmodelrevealedbymultiomicanalyses