Cargando…

Applicability of a single‐use bioreactor compared to a glass bioreactor for the fermentation of filamentous fungi and evaluation of the reproducibility of growth in pellet form

The implementation of single‐use technologies offers several major advantages, e.g. prevention of cross‐contamination, especially when spore‐forming microorganisms are present. This study investigated the application of a single‐use bioreactor in batch fermentation of filamentous fungus Penicillium...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Soerjawinata, Winda, Schlegel, Konstantin, Fuchs, Natalie, Schüffler, Anja, Schirmeister, Tanja, Ulber, Roland, Kampeis, Percy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8092982/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33976605
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/elsc.202000069
_version_ 1783687719677853696
author Soerjawinata, Winda
Schlegel, Konstantin
Fuchs, Natalie
Schüffler, Anja
Schirmeister, Tanja
Ulber, Roland
Kampeis, Percy
author_facet Soerjawinata, Winda
Schlegel, Konstantin
Fuchs, Natalie
Schüffler, Anja
Schirmeister, Tanja
Ulber, Roland
Kampeis, Percy
author_sort Soerjawinata, Winda
collection PubMed
description The implementation of single‐use technologies offers several major advantages, e.g. prevention of cross‐contamination, especially when spore‐forming microorganisms are present. This study investigated the application of a single‐use bioreactor in batch fermentation of filamentous fungus Penicillium sp. (IBWF 040‐09) from the Institute of Biotechnology and Drug Research (IBWF), which is capable of intracellular production of a protease inhibitor against parasitic proteases as a secondary metabolite. Several modifications to the SU bioreactor were suggested in this study to allow the fermentation in which the fungus forms pellets. Simultaneously, fermentations in conventional glass bioreactor were also conducted as reference. Although there are significant differences in the construction material and gassing system, the similarity of the two types of bioreactors in terms of fungal metabolic activity and the reproducibility of fermentations could be demonstrated using statistic methods. Under the selected cultivation conditions, growth rate, yield coefficient, substrate uptake rate, and formation of intracellular protease‐inhibiting substance in the single‐use bioreactor were similar to those in the glass bioreactor.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8092982
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80929822021-05-10 Applicability of a single‐use bioreactor compared to a glass bioreactor for the fermentation of filamentous fungi and evaluation of the reproducibility of growth in pellet form Soerjawinata, Winda Schlegel, Konstantin Fuchs, Natalie Schüffler, Anja Schirmeister, Tanja Ulber, Roland Kampeis, Percy Eng Life Sci Research Articles The implementation of single‐use technologies offers several major advantages, e.g. prevention of cross‐contamination, especially when spore‐forming microorganisms are present. This study investigated the application of a single‐use bioreactor in batch fermentation of filamentous fungus Penicillium sp. (IBWF 040‐09) from the Institute of Biotechnology and Drug Research (IBWF), which is capable of intracellular production of a protease inhibitor against parasitic proteases as a secondary metabolite. Several modifications to the SU bioreactor were suggested in this study to allow the fermentation in which the fungus forms pellets. Simultaneously, fermentations in conventional glass bioreactor were also conducted as reference. Although there are significant differences in the construction material and gassing system, the similarity of the two types of bioreactors in terms of fungal metabolic activity and the reproducibility of fermentations could be demonstrated using statistic methods. Under the selected cultivation conditions, growth rate, yield coefficient, substrate uptake rate, and formation of intracellular protease‐inhibiting substance in the single‐use bioreactor were similar to those in the glass bioreactor. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8092982/ /pubmed/33976605 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/elsc.202000069 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Engineering in Life Sciences published by Wiley‐VCH GmbH https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Soerjawinata, Winda
Schlegel, Konstantin
Fuchs, Natalie
Schüffler, Anja
Schirmeister, Tanja
Ulber, Roland
Kampeis, Percy
Applicability of a single‐use bioreactor compared to a glass bioreactor for the fermentation of filamentous fungi and evaluation of the reproducibility of growth in pellet form
title Applicability of a single‐use bioreactor compared to a glass bioreactor for the fermentation of filamentous fungi and evaluation of the reproducibility of growth in pellet form
title_full Applicability of a single‐use bioreactor compared to a glass bioreactor for the fermentation of filamentous fungi and evaluation of the reproducibility of growth in pellet form
title_fullStr Applicability of a single‐use bioreactor compared to a glass bioreactor for the fermentation of filamentous fungi and evaluation of the reproducibility of growth in pellet form
title_full_unstemmed Applicability of a single‐use bioreactor compared to a glass bioreactor for the fermentation of filamentous fungi and evaluation of the reproducibility of growth in pellet form
title_short Applicability of a single‐use bioreactor compared to a glass bioreactor for the fermentation of filamentous fungi and evaluation of the reproducibility of growth in pellet form
title_sort applicability of a single‐use bioreactor compared to a glass bioreactor for the fermentation of filamentous fungi and evaluation of the reproducibility of growth in pellet form
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8092982/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33976605
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/elsc.202000069
work_keys_str_mv AT soerjawinatawinda applicabilityofasingleusebioreactorcomparedtoaglassbioreactorforthefermentationoffilamentousfungiandevaluationofthereproducibilityofgrowthinpelletform
AT schlegelkonstantin applicabilityofasingleusebioreactorcomparedtoaglassbioreactorforthefermentationoffilamentousfungiandevaluationofthereproducibilityofgrowthinpelletform
AT fuchsnatalie applicabilityofasingleusebioreactorcomparedtoaglassbioreactorforthefermentationoffilamentousfungiandevaluationofthereproducibilityofgrowthinpelletform
AT schuffleranja applicabilityofasingleusebioreactorcomparedtoaglassbioreactorforthefermentationoffilamentousfungiandevaluationofthereproducibilityofgrowthinpelletform
AT schirmeistertanja applicabilityofasingleusebioreactorcomparedtoaglassbioreactorforthefermentationoffilamentousfungiandevaluationofthereproducibilityofgrowthinpelletform
AT ulberroland applicabilityofasingleusebioreactorcomparedtoaglassbioreactorforthefermentationoffilamentousfungiandevaluationofthereproducibilityofgrowthinpelletform
AT kampeispercy applicabilityofasingleusebioreactorcomparedtoaglassbioreactorforthefermentationoffilamentousfungiandevaluationofthereproducibilityofgrowthinpelletform