Cargando…

Prospective evaluation of a new intense pulsed light, thermaeye plus, in the treatment of dry eye disease due to meibomian gland dysfunction()

PURPOSE: This study aims to estimate the efficacy and safety of a new intense pulsed light (IPL) Thermaeye Plus for dry eye disease (DED) secondary to meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a prospective, longitudinal study of patients with moderate to severe MGD. Treatment...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vergés, Carlos, Salgado-Borges, José, Ribot, Francesc March de
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8093543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33121905
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2020.08.009
_version_ 1783687831577690112
author Vergés, Carlos
Salgado-Borges, José
Ribot, Francesc March de
author_facet Vergés, Carlos
Salgado-Borges, José
Ribot, Francesc March de
author_sort Vergés, Carlos
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study aims to estimate the efficacy and safety of a new intense pulsed light (IPL) Thermaeye Plus for dry eye disease (DED) secondary to meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a prospective, longitudinal study of patients with moderate to severe MGD. Treatment consisted of 4 consecutive IPL sessions, 12 flashes with the same energy 8 J/cm(2) on the periocular area at days 1, 14, 28, and 49. All patients were evaluated before each IPL sessions and 1 and 4 months after the last session. Measuring: Symptoms score and OSDI questionnaire, Non-invasive tear meniscus height (NITMH), Non-invasive break up (NITBUT), Tear osmolarity (TO), Corneal fluorescein staining (CFS) and Eyelid margin and Meibomian gland assessment. The adverse effects on the eye, periocular area, and systemic complications were evaluated. All types of skin pigmentation (Fitzpatrick scale I to VI) were included. RESULTS: The study included 44 consecutive patients (88 eyes), 40 males and 48 females, with a mean age of 52.5 ± 13.6 years, ranging from 22 to 78 years. Significant improvements were observed in single and total signs and symptoms. The most significant changes were observed in dryness, foreign body sensation (p < 0.001), and pain (p < 0.005). The OSDI questionnaire showed a significant decrease in total symptoms (p < 0.003). The percentage of patients with a normal index <13, improved from 23.8% (10 patients) at baseline to 80.9% (34 patients) at last visit, after 23 weeks. Clinical sings also improved, more than 90%, stand out telangiectasia and blepharitis (p < 0.002, and p < 0.0005, respectively). No statistical differences between age (<40 y, 40–60 y, and >60 y) and gender were observed. The clinical improvement began after the second and third week after the first IPL session, until the end of the IPL treatment (D49). After that, the results maintained stable until the last visit, after 11 weeks. No complications were reported locally, nor in the periocular area as well as systemically. CONCLUSION: Thermaeye Plus, a new IPL for ophthalmic use, is a safe and effective treatment in patients with DED due to MGD, showing improvement from the second week of treatment and maintaining until the last visit, 4 months after the last IPL session (23 weeks of total follow-up). Patients with pigmented skin (Fitzpatrick V or VI) have been treated with no side effects. It is relevant, especially to apply in brown-dark skin populations since complications with other IPL devices have been reported.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8093543
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80935432021-05-13 Prospective evaluation of a new intense pulsed light, thermaeye plus, in the treatment of dry eye disease due to meibomian gland dysfunction() Vergés, Carlos Salgado-Borges, José Ribot, Francesc March de J Optom Review PURPOSE: This study aims to estimate the efficacy and safety of a new intense pulsed light (IPL) Thermaeye Plus for dry eye disease (DED) secondary to meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a prospective, longitudinal study of patients with moderate to severe MGD. Treatment consisted of 4 consecutive IPL sessions, 12 flashes with the same energy 8 J/cm(2) on the periocular area at days 1, 14, 28, and 49. All patients were evaluated before each IPL sessions and 1 and 4 months after the last session. Measuring: Symptoms score and OSDI questionnaire, Non-invasive tear meniscus height (NITMH), Non-invasive break up (NITBUT), Tear osmolarity (TO), Corneal fluorescein staining (CFS) and Eyelid margin and Meibomian gland assessment. The adverse effects on the eye, periocular area, and systemic complications were evaluated. All types of skin pigmentation (Fitzpatrick scale I to VI) were included. RESULTS: The study included 44 consecutive patients (88 eyes), 40 males and 48 females, with a mean age of 52.5 ± 13.6 years, ranging from 22 to 78 years. Significant improvements were observed in single and total signs and symptoms. The most significant changes were observed in dryness, foreign body sensation (p < 0.001), and pain (p < 0.005). The OSDI questionnaire showed a significant decrease in total symptoms (p < 0.003). The percentage of patients with a normal index <13, improved from 23.8% (10 patients) at baseline to 80.9% (34 patients) at last visit, after 23 weeks. Clinical sings also improved, more than 90%, stand out telangiectasia and blepharitis (p < 0.002, and p < 0.0005, respectively). No statistical differences between age (<40 y, 40–60 y, and >60 y) and gender were observed. The clinical improvement began after the second and third week after the first IPL session, until the end of the IPL treatment (D49). After that, the results maintained stable until the last visit, after 11 weeks. No complications were reported locally, nor in the periocular area as well as systemically. CONCLUSION: Thermaeye Plus, a new IPL for ophthalmic use, is a safe and effective treatment in patients with DED due to MGD, showing improvement from the second week of treatment and maintaining until the last visit, 4 months after the last IPL session (23 weeks of total follow-up). Patients with pigmented skin (Fitzpatrick V or VI) have been treated with no side effects. It is relevant, especially to apply in brown-dark skin populations since complications with other IPL devices have been reported. Elsevier 2021 2020-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8093543/ /pubmed/33121905 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2020.08.009 Text en © 2020 Spanish General Council of Optometry. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Vergés, Carlos
Salgado-Borges, José
Ribot, Francesc March de
Prospective evaluation of a new intense pulsed light, thermaeye plus, in the treatment of dry eye disease due to meibomian gland dysfunction()
title Prospective evaluation of a new intense pulsed light, thermaeye plus, in the treatment of dry eye disease due to meibomian gland dysfunction()
title_full Prospective evaluation of a new intense pulsed light, thermaeye plus, in the treatment of dry eye disease due to meibomian gland dysfunction()
title_fullStr Prospective evaluation of a new intense pulsed light, thermaeye plus, in the treatment of dry eye disease due to meibomian gland dysfunction()
title_full_unstemmed Prospective evaluation of a new intense pulsed light, thermaeye plus, in the treatment of dry eye disease due to meibomian gland dysfunction()
title_short Prospective evaluation of a new intense pulsed light, thermaeye plus, in the treatment of dry eye disease due to meibomian gland dysfunction()
title_sort prospective evaluation of a new intense pulsed light, thermaeye plus, in the treatment of dry eye disease due to meibomian gland dysfunction()
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8093543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33121905
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2020.08.009
work_keys_str_mv AT vergescarlos prospectiveevaluationofanewintensepulsedlightthermaeyeplusinthetreatmentofdryeyediseaseduetomeibomianglanddysfunction
AT salgadoborgesjose prospectiveevaluationofanewintensepulsedlightthermaeyeplusinthetreatmentofdryeyediseaseduetomeibomianglanddysfunction
AT ribotfrancescmarchde prospectiveevaluationofanewintensepulsedlightthermaeyeplusinthetreatmentofdryeyediseaseduetomeibomianglanddysfunction