Cargando…

Considering sampling bias in close‐kin mark–recapture abundance estimates of Atlantic salmon

Genetic methods for the estimation of population size can be powerful alternatives to conventional methods. Close‐kin mark–recapture (CKMR) is based on the principles of conventional mark–recapture, but instead of being physically marked, individuals are marked through their close kin. The aim of th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wacker, Sebastian, Skaug, Hans J., Forseth, Torbjørn, Solem, Øyvind, Ulvan, Eva M., Fiske, Peder, Karlsson, Sten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8093659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33976784
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7279
_version_ 1783687858061574144
author Wacker, Sebastian
Skaug, Hans J.
Forseth, Torbjørn
Solem, Øyvind
Ulvan, Eva M.
Fiske, Peder
Karlsson, Sten
author_facet Wacker, Sebastian
Skaug, Hans J.
Forseth, Torbjørn
Solem, Øyvind
Ulvan, Eva M.
Fiske, Peder
Karlsson, Sten
author_sort Wacker, Sebastian
collection PubMed
description Genetic methods for the estimation of population size can be powerful alternatives to conventional methods. Close‐kin mark–recapture (CKMR) is based on the principles of conventional mark–recapture, but instead of being physically marked, individuals are marked through their close kin. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential of CKMR for the estimation of spawner abundance in Atlantic salmon and how age, sex, spatial, and temporal sampling bias may affect CKMR estimates. Spawner abundance in a wild population was estimated from genetic samples of adults returning in 2018 and of their potential offspring collected in 2019. Adult samples were obtained in two ways. First, adults were sampled and released alive in the breeding habitat during spawning surveys. Second, genetic samples were collected from out‐migrating smolts PIT‐tagged in 2017 and registered when returning as adults in 2018. CKMR estimates based on adult samples collected during spawning surveys were somewhat higher than conventional counts. Uncertainty was small (CV < 0.15), due to the detection of a high number of parent–offspring pairs. Sampling of adults was age‐ and size‐biased and correction for those biases resulted in moderate changes in the CKMR estimate. Juvenile dispersal was limited, but spatially balanced sampling of adults rendered CKMR estimates robust to spatially biased sampling of juveniles. CKMR estimates based on returning PIT‐tagged adults were approximately twice as high as estimates based on samples collected during spawning surveys. We suggest that estimates based on PIT‐tagged fish reflect the total abundance of adults entering the river, while estimates based on samples collected during spawning surveys reflect the abundance of adults present in the breeding habitat at the time of spawning. Our study showed that CKMR can be used to estimate spawner abundance in Atlantic salmon, with a moderate sampling effort, but a carefully designed sampling regime is required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8093659
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80936592021-05-10 Considering sampling bias in close‐kin mark–recapture abundance estimates of Atlantic salmon Wacker, Sebastian Skaug, Hans J. Forseth, Torbjørn Solem, Øyvind Ulvan, Eva M. Fiske, Peder Karlsson, Sten Ecol Evol Original Research Genetic methods for the estimation of population size can be powerful alternatives to conventional methods. Close‐kin mark–recapture (CKMR) is based on the principles of conventional mark–recapture, but instead of being physically marked, individuals are marked through their close kin. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential of CKMR for the estimation of spawner abundance in Atlantic salmon and how age, sex, spatial, and temporal sampling bias may affect CKMR estimates. Spawner abundance in a wild population was estimated from genetic samples of adults returning in 2018 and of their potential offspring collected in 2019. Adult samples were obtained in two ways. First, adults were sampled and released alive in the breeding habitat during spawning surveys. Second, genetic samples were collected from out‐migrating smolts PIT‐tagged in 2017 and registered when returning as adults in 2018. CKMR estimates based on adult samples collected during spawning surveys were somewhat higher than conventional counts. Uncertainty was small (CV < 0.15), due to the detection of a high number of parent–offspring pairs. Sampling of adults was age‐ and size‐biased and correction for those biases resulted in moderate changes in the CKMR estimate. Juvenile dispersal was limited, but spatially balanced sampling of adults rendered CKMR estimates robust to spatially biased sampling of juveniles. CKMR estimates based on returning PIT‐tagged adults were approximately twice as high as estimates based on samples collected during spawning surveys. We suggest that estimates based on PIT‐tagged fish reflect the total abundance of adults entering the river, while estimates based on samples collected during spawning surveys reflect the abundance of adults present in the breeding habitat at the time of spawning. Our study showed that CKMR can be used to estimate spawner abundance in Atlantic salmon, with a moderate sampling effort, but a carefully designed sampling regime is required. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8093659/ /pubmed/33976784 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7279 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Wacker, Sebastian
Skaug, Hans J.
Forseth, Torbjørn
Solem, Øyvind
Ulvan, Eva M.
Fiske, Peder
Karlsson, Sten
Considering sampling bias in close‐kin mark–recapture abundance estimates of Atlantic salmon
title Considering sampling bias in close‐kin mark–recapture abundance estimates of Atlantic salmon
title_full Considering sampling bias in close‐kin mark–recapture abundance estimates of Atlantic salmon
title_fullStr Considering sampling bias in close‐kin mark–recapture abundance estimates of Atlantic salmon
title_full_unstemmed Considering sampling bias in close‐kin mark–recapture abundance estimates of Atlantic salmon
title_short Considering sampling bias in close‐kin mark–recapture abundance estimates of Atlantic salmon
title_sort considering sampling bias in close‐kin mark–recapture abundance estimates of atlantic salmon
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8093659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33976784
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7279
work_keys_str_mv AT wackersebastian consideringsamplingbiasinclosekinmarkrecaptureabundanceestimatesofatlanticsalmon
AT skaughansj consideringsamplingbiasinclosekinmarkrecaptureabundanceestimatesofatlanticsalmon
AT forsethtorbjørn consideringsamplingbiasinclosekinmarkrecaptureabundanceestimatesofatlanticsalmon
AT solemøyvind consideringsamplingbiasinclosekinmarkrecaptureabundanceestimatesofatlanticsalmon
AT ulvanevam consideringsamplingbiasinclosekinmarkrecaptureabundanceestimatesofatlanticsalmon
AT fiskepeder consideringsamplingbiasinclosekinmarkrecaptureabundanceestimatesofatlanticsalmon
AT karlssonsten consideringsamplingbiasinclosekinmarkrecaptureabundanceestimatesofatlanticsalmon