Cargando…

Identifying biotic drivers of population dynamics in a benthic–pelagic community

Benthic species and communities are linked to pelagic zooplankton through life‐stages encompassing both benthic and pelagic habitats and through a mutual dependency on primary producers as a food source. Many zooplankton taxa contribute to the sedimentary system as benthic eggs. Our main aim was to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Forsblom, Louise, Lindén, Andreas, Engström‐Öst, Jonna, Lehtiniemi, Maiju, Bonsdorff, Erik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8093679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33976792
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7298
_version_ 1783687862886072320
author Forsblom, Louise
Lindén, Andreas
Engström‐Öst, Jonna
Lehtiniemi, Maiju
Bonsdorff, Erik
author_facet Forsblom, Louise
Lindén, Andreas
Engström‐Öst, Jonna
Lehtiniemi, Maiju
Bonsdorff, Erik
author_sort Forsblom, Louise
collection PubMed
description Benthic species and communities are linked to pelagic zooplankton through life‐stages encompassing both benthic and pelagic habitats and through a mutual dependency on primary producers as a food source. Many zooplankton taxa contribute to the sedimentary system as benthic eggs. Our main aim was to investigate the nature of the population level biotic interactions between and within these two seemingly independent communities, both dependent on the pelagic primary production, while simultaneously accounting for environmental drivers (salinity, temperature, and oxygen conditions). To this end, we applied multivariate autoregressive state‐space models to long (1966–2007) time series of annual abundance data, comparing models with and without interspecific interactions, and models with and without environmental variables included. We were not able to detect any direct coupling between sediment‐dwelling benthic taxa and pelagic copepods and cladocerans on the annual scale, but the most parsimonious model indicated that interactions within the benthic community are important. There were also positive residual correlations between the copepods and cladocerans potentially reflecting the availability of a shared resource or similar seasonal dependence, whereas both groups tended to correlate negatively with the zoobenthic taxa. The most notable single interaction within the benthic community was a tendency for a negative effect of Limecola balthica on the amphipods Monoporeia affinis and Pontoporeia femorata which can help explain the observed decrease in amphipods due to increased competitive interference.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8093679
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80936792021-05-10 Identifying biotic drivers of population dynamics in a benthic–pelagic community Forsblom, Louise Lindén, Andreas Engström‐Öst, Jonna Lehtiniemi, Maiju Bonsdorff, Erik Ecol Evol Original Research Benthic species and communities are linked to pelagic zooplankton through life‐stages encompassing both benthic and pelagic habitats and through a mutual dependency on primary producers as a food source. Many zooplankton taxa contribute to the sedimentary system as benthic eggs. Our main aim was to investigate the nature of the population level biotic interactions between and within these two seemingly independent communities, both dependent on the pelagic primary production, while simultaneously accounting for environmental drivers (salinity, temperature, and oxygen conditions). To this end, we applied multivariate autoregressive state‐space models to long (1966–2007) time series of annual abundance data, comparing models with and without interspecific interactions, and models with and without environmental variables included. We were not able to detect any direct coupling between sediment‐dwelling benthic taxa and pelagic copepods and cladocerans on the annual scale, but the most parsimonious model indicated that interactions within the benthic community are important. There were also positive residual correlations between the copepods and cladocerans potentially reflecting the availability of a shared resource or similar seasonal dependence, whereas both groups tended to correlate negatively with the zoobenthic taxa. The most notable single interaction within the benthic community was a tendency for a negative effect of Limecola balthica on the amphipods Monoporeia affinis and Pontoporeia femorata which can help explain the observed decrease in amphipods due to increased competitive interference. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8093679/ /pubmed/33976792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7298 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Forsblom, Louise
Lindén, Andreas
Engström‐Öst, Jonna
Lehtiniemi, Maiju
Bonsdorff, Erik
Identifying biotic drivers of population dynamics in a benthic–pelagic community
title Identifying biotic drivers of population dynamics in a benthic–pelagic community
title_full Identifying biotic drivers of population dynamics in a benthic–pelagic community
title_fullStr Identifying biotic drivers of population dynamics in a benthic–pelagic community
title_full_unstemmed Identifying biotic drivers of population dynamics in a benthic–pelagic community
title_short Identifying biotic drivers of population dynamics in a benthic–pelagic community
title_sort identifying biotic drivers of population dynamics in a benthic–pelagic community
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8093679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33976792
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7298
work_keys_str_mv AT forsblomlouise identifyingbioticdriversofpopulationdynamicsinabenthicpelagiccommunity
AT lindenandreas identifyingbioticdriversofpopulationdynamicsinabenthicpelagiccommunity
AT engstromostjonna identifyingbioticdriversofpopulationdynamicsinabenthicpelagiccommunity
AT lehtiniemimaiju identifyingbioticdriversofpopulationdynamicsinabenthicpelagiccommunity
AT bonsdorfferik identifyingbioticdriversofpopulationdynamicsinabenthicpelagiccommunity