Cargando…
Identifying biotic drivers of population dynamics in a benthic–pelagic community
Benthic species and communities are linked to pelagic zooplankton through life‐stages encompassing both benthic and pelagic habitats and through a mutual dependency on primary producers as a food source. Many zooplankton taxa contribute to the sedimentary system as benthic eggs. Our main aim was to...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8093679/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33976792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7298 |
_version_ | 1783687862886072320 |
---|---|
author | Forsblom, Louise Lindén, Andreas Engström‐Öst, Jonna Lehtiniemi, Maiju Bonsdorff, Erik |
author_facet | Forsblom, Louise Lindén, Andreas Engström‐Öst, Jonna Lehtiniemi, Maiju Bonsdorff, Erik |
author_sort | Forsblom, Louise |
collection | PubMed |
description | Benthic species and communities are linked to pelagic zooplankton through life‐stages encompassing both benthic and pelagic habitats and through a mutual dependency on primary producers as a food source. Many zooplankton taxa contribute to the sedimentary system as benthic eggs. Our main aim was to investigate the nature of the population level biotic interactions between and within these two seemingly independent communities, both dependent on the pelagic primary production, while simultaneously accounting for environmental drivers (salinity, temperature, and oxygen conditions). To this end, we applied multivariate autoregressive state‐space models to long (1966–2007) time series of annual abundance data, comparing models with and without interspecific interactions, and models with and without environmental variables included. We were not able to detect any direct coupling between sediment‐dwelling benthic taxa and pelagic copepods and cladocerans on the annual scale, but the most parsimonious model indicated that interactions within the benthic community are important. There were also positive residual correlations between the copepods and cladocerans potentially reflecting the availability of a shared resource or similar seasonal dependence, whereas both groups tended to correlate negatively with the zoobenthic taxa. The most notable single interaction within the benthic community was a tendency for a negative effect of Limecola balthica on the amphipods Monoporeia affinis and Pontoporeia femorata which can help explain the observed decrease in amphipods due to increased competitive interference. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8093679 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80936792021-05-10 Identifying biotic drivers of population dynamics in a benthic–pelagic community Forsblom, Louise Lindén, Andreas Engström‐Öst, Jonna Lehtiniemi, Maiju Bonsdorff, Erik Ecol Evol Original Research Benthic species and communities are linked to pelagic zooplankton through life‐stages encompassing both benthic and pelagic habitats and through a mutual dependency on primary producers as a food source. Many zooplankton taxa contribute to the sedimentary system as benthic eggs. Our main aim was to investigate the nature of the population level biotic interactions between and within these two seemingly independent communities, both dependent on the pelagic primary production, while simultaneously accounting for environmental drivers (salinity, temperature, and oxygen conditions). To this end, we applied multivariate autoregressive state‐space models to long (1966–2007) time series of annual abundance data, comparing models with and without interspecific interactions, and models with and without environmental variables included. We were not able to detect any direct coupling between sediment‐dwelling benthic taxa and pelagic copepods and cladocerans on the annual scale, but the most parsimonious model indicated that interactions within the benthic community are important. There were also positive residual correlations between the copepods and cladocerans potentially reflecting the availability of a shared resource or similar seasonal dependence, whereas both groups tended to correlate negatively with the zoobenthic taxa. The most notable single interaction within the benthic community was a tendency for a negative effect of Limecola balthica on the amphipods Monoporeia affinis and Pontoporeia femorata which can help explain the observed decrease in amphipods due to increased competitive interference. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8093679/ /pubmed/33976792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7298 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Forsblom, Louise Lindén, Andreas Engström‐Öst, Jonna Lehtiniemi, Maiju Bonsdorff, Erik Identifying biotic drivers of population dynamics in a benthic–pelagic community |
title | Identifying biotic drivers of population dynamics in a benthic–pelagic community |
title_full | Identifying biotic drivers of population dynamics in a benthic–pelagic community |
title_fullStr | Identifying biotic drivers of population dynamics in a benthic–pelagic community |
title_full_unstemmed | Identifying biotic drivers of population dynamics in a benthic–pelagic community |
title_short | Identifying biotic drivers of population dynamics in a benthic–pelagic community |
title_sort | identifying biotic drivers of population dynamics in a benthic–pelagic community |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8093679/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33976792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7298 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT forsblomlouise identifyingbioticdriversofpopulationdynamicsinabenthicpelagiccommunity AT lindenandreas identifyingbioticdriversofpopulationdynamicsinabenthicpelagiccommunity AT engstromostjonna identifyingbioticdriversofpopulationdynamicsinabenthicpelagiccommunity AT lehtiniemimaiju identifyingbioticdriversofpopulationdynamicsinabenthicpelagiccommunity AT bonsdorfferik identifyingbioticdriversofpopulationdynamicsinabenthicpelagiccommunity |