Cargando…

Deep reefs are not refugium for shallow‐water fish communities in the southwestern Atlantic

1. The deep reef refugia hypothesis (DRRH) predicts that deep reef ecosystems may act as refugium for the biota of disturbed shallow waters. Because deep reefs are among the most understudied habitats on Earth, formal tests of the DRRH remain scarce. If the DRRH is valid at the community level, the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Medeiros, Aline P. M., Ferreira, Beatrice P., Alvarado, Fredy, Betancur‐R, Ricardo, Soares, Marcelo O., Santos, Bráulio A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8093723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33976819
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7336
_version_ 1783687873082425344
author Medeiros, Aline P. M.
Ferreira, Beatrice P.
Alvarado, Fredy
Betancur‐R, Ricardo
Soares, Marcelo O.
Santos, Bráulio A.
author_facet Medeiros, Aline P. M.
Ferreira, Beatrice P.
Alvarado, Fredy
Betancur‐R, Ricardo
Soares, Marcelo O.
Santos, Bráulio A.
author_sort Medeiros, Aline P. M.
collection PubMed
description 1. The deep reef refugia hypothesis (DRRH) predicts that deep reef ecosystems may act as refugium for the biota of disturbed shallow waters. Because deep reefs are among the most understudied habitats on Earth, formal tests of the DRRH remain scarce. If the DRRH is valid at the community level, the diversity of species, functions, and lineages of fish communities of shallow reefs should be encapsulated in deep reefs. 2. We tested the DRRH by assessing the taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic diversity of 22 Brazilian fish communities between 2 and 62 m depth. We partitioned the gamma diversity of shallow (<30 m) and deep reefs (>30 m) into independent alpha and beta components, accounted for species’ abundance, and assessed whether beta patterns were mostly driven by spatial turnover or nestedness. 3. We recorded 3,821 fishes belonging to 85 species and 36 families. Contrary to DRRH expectations, only 48% of the species occurred in both shallow and deep reefs. Alpha diversity of rare species was higher in deep reefs as expected, but alpha diversity of typical and dominant species did not vary with depth. Alpha functional diversity was higher in deep reefs only for rare and typical species, but not for dominant species. Alpha phylogenetic diversity was consistently higher in deep reefs, supporting DRRH expectations. 4. Profiles of taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic beta diversity indicated that deep reefs were not more heterogeneous than shallow reefs, contradicting expectations of biotic homogenization near sea surface. Furthermore, pairwise beta‐diversity analyses revealed that the patterns were mostly driven by spatial turnover rather than nestedness at any depth. 5. Conclusions. Although some results support the DRRH, most indicate that the shallow‐water reef fish diversity is not fully encapsulated in deep reefs. Every reef contributes significantly to the regional diversity and must be managed and protected accordingly.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8093723
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80937232021-05-10 Deep reefs are not refugium for shallow‐water fish communities in the southwestern Atlantic Medeiros, Aline P. M. Ferreira, Beatrice P. Alvarado, Fredy Betancur‐R, Ricardo Soares, Marcelo O. Santos, Bráulio A. Ecol Evol Original Research 1. The deep reef refugia hypothesis (DRRH) predicts that deep reef ecosystems may act as refugium for the biota of disturbed shallow waters. Because deep reefs are among the most understudied habitats on Earth, formal tests of the DRRH remain scarce. If the DRRH is valid at the community level, the diversity of species, functions, and lineages of fish communities of shallow reefs should be encapsulated in deep reefs. 2. We tested the DRRH by assessing the taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic diversity of 22 Brazilian fish communities between 2 and 62 m depth. We partitioned the gamma diversity of shallow (<30 m) and deep reefs (>30 m) into independent alpha and beta components, accounted for species’ abundance, and assessed whether beta patterns were mostly driven by spatial turnover or nestedness. 3. We recorded 3,821 fishes belonging to 85 species and 36 families. Contrary to DRRH expectations, only 48% of the species occurred in both shallow and deep reefs. Alpha diversity of rare species was higher in deep reefs as expected, but alpha diversity of typical and dominant species did not vary with depth. Alpha functional diversity was higher in deep reefs only for rare and typical species, but not for dominant species. Alpha phylogenetic diversity was consistently higher in deep reefs, supporting DRRH expectations. 4. Profiles of taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic beta diversity indicated that deep reefs were not more heterogeneous than shallow reefs, contradicting expectations of biotic homogenization near sea surface. Furthermore, pairwise beta‐diversity analyses revealed that the patterns were mostly driven by spatial turnover rather than nestedness at any depth. 5. Conclusions. Although some results support the DRRH, most indicate that the shallow‐water reef fish diversity is not fully encapsulated in deep reefs. Every reef contributes significantly to the regional diversity and must be managed and protected accordingly. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8093723/ /pubmed/33976819 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7336 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Medeiros, Aline P. M.
Ferreira, Beatrice P.
Alvarado, Fredy
Betancur‐R, Ricardo
Soares, Marcelo O.
Santos, Bráulio A.
Deep reefs are not refugium for shallow‐water fish communities in the southwestern Atlantic
title Deep reefs are not refugium for shallow‐water fish communities in the southwestern Atlantic
title_full Deep reefs are not refugium for shallow‐water fish communities in the southwestern Atlantic
title_fullStr Deep reefs are not refugium for shallow‐water fish communities in the southwestern Atlantic
title_full_unstemmed Deep reefs are not refugium for shallow‐water fish communities in the southwestern Atlantic
title_short Deep reefs are not refugium for shallow‐water fish communities in the southwestern Atlantic
title_sort deep reefs are not refugium for shallow‐water fish communities in the southwestern atlantic
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8093723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33976819
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7336
work_keys_str_mv AT medeirosalinepm deepreefsarenotrefugiumforshallowwaterfishcommunitiesinthesouthwesternatlantic
AT ferreirabeatricep deepreefsarenotrefugiumforshallowwaterfishcommunitiesinthesouthwesternatlantic
AT alvaradofredy deepreefsarenotrefugiumforshallowwaterfishcommunitiesinthesouthwesternatlantic
AT betancurrricardo deepreefsarenotrefugiumforshallowwaterfishcommunitiesinthesouthwesternatlantic
AT soaresmarceloo deepreefsarenotrefugiumforshallowwaterfishcommunitiesinthesouthwesternatlantic
AT santosbraulioa deepreefsarenotrefugiumforshallowwaterfishcommunitiesinthesouthwesternatlantic