Cargando…

Comparison of remifentanil concentrations with and without dexmedetomidine for the prevention of emergence cough after nasal surgery: a randomized double-blinded trial

BACKGROUND: Preventing emergence cough after nasal surgery is critical. Emergence cough can provoke immediate postoperative bleeding, which leads to upper airway obstruction. In the present study, we compared the effect-site concentration (Ce) of remifentanil to prevent emergence cough after propofo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Ha Yeon, Kwak, Hyun Jeong, Lee, Dongchul, Lee, Ji Hyea, Min, Sang Kee, Kim, Jong Yeop
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8094520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33941098
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01358-x
_version_ 1783687986322341888
author Kim, Ha Yeon
Kwak, Hyun Jeong
Lee, Dongchul
Lee, Ji Hyea
Min, Sang Kee
Kim, Jong Yeop
author_facet Kim, Ha Yeon
Kwak, Hyun Jeong
Lee, Dongchul
Lee, Ji Hyea
Min, Sang Kee
Kim, Jong Yeop
author_sort Kim, Ha Yeon
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Preventing emergence cough after nasal surgery is critical. Emergence cough can provoke immediate postoperative bleeding, which leads to upper airway obstruction. In the present study, we compared the effect-site concentration (Ce) of remifentanil to prevent emergence cough after propofol anesthesia for nasal surgery when remifentanil was or was not combined with dexmedetomidine. METHODS: Forty-seven patients with propofol-remifentanil anesthesia for nasal surgery were randomly assigned to a dexmedetomidine group (Group D, n = 23) or a saline group (Group S, n = 24). Group D and Group S were infused with dexmedetomidine (0.5 μg/kg) and saline, respectively, for 10 min before the completion of surgery. A predetermined Ce of remifentanil was infused until extubation. Remifentanil Ce to prevent cough in 50 and 95% of patients (EC(50) and EC(95)) was estimated using modified Dixon’s up-and-down method and isotonic regression. Hemodynamic and recovery parameters were recorded. RESULTS: The EC(50) of remifentanil Ce was significantly lower in Group D than in Group S (2.15 ± 0.40 ng/mL vs. 2.66 ± 0.36 ng/mL, p = 0.023). The EC(95) (95% CI) of remifentanil Ce was also significantly lower in Group D [2.75 (2.67–2.78) ng/mL] than in Group S [3.16 (3.06–3.18) ng/mL]. Emergence and recovery variables did not differ between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The remifentanil EC(50) to prevent cough after propofol-remifentanil anesthesia was significantly lower (approximately 19%) when a combination of remifentanil and 0.5 μg/kg dexmedetomidine was used than when remifentanil infusion alone was used in patients undergoing nasal surgery. Therefore, the Ce of remifentanil may be adjusted to prevent emergence cough when used in combination with dexmedetomidine. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03622502, August 9, 2018).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8094520
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80945202021-05-04 Comparison of remifentanil concentrations with and without dexmedetomidine for the prevention of emergence cough after nasal surgery: a randomized double-blinded trial Kim, Ha Yeon Kwak, Hyun Jeong Lee, Dongchul Lee, Ji Hyea Min, Sang Kee Kim, Jong Yeop BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Preventing emergence cough after nasal surgery is critical. Emergence cough can provoke immediate postoperative bleeding, which leads to upper airway obstruction. In the present study, we compared the effect-site concentration (Ce) of remifentanil to prevent emergence cough after propofol anesthesia for nasal surgery when remifentanil was or was not combined with dexmedetomidine. METHODS: Forty-seven patients with propofol-remifentanil anesthesia for nasal surgery were randomly assigned to a dexmedetomidine group (Group D, n = 23) or a saline group (Group S, n = 24). Group D and Group S were infused with dexmedetomidine (0.5 μg/kg) and saline, respectively, for 10 min before the completion of surgery. A predetermined Ce of remifentanil was infused until extubation. Remifentanil Ce to prevent cough in 50 and 95% of patients (EC(50) and EC(95)) was estimated using modified Dixon’s up-and-down method and isotonic regression. Hemodynamic and recovery parameters were recorded. RESULTS: The EC(50) of remifentanil Ce was significantly lower in Group D than in Group S (2.15 ± 0.40 ng/mL vs. 2.66 ± 0.36 ng/mL, p = 0.023). The EC(95) (95% CI) of remifentanil Ce was also significantly lower in Group D [2.75 (2.67–2.78) ng/mL] than in Group S [3.16 (3.06–3.18) ng/mL]. Emergence and recovery variables did not differ between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The remifentanil EC(50) to prevent cough after propofol-remifentanil anesthesia was significantly lower (approximately 19%) when a combination of remifentanil and 0.5 μg/kg dexmedetomidine was used than when remifentanil infusion alone was used in patients undergoing nasal surgery. Therefore, the Ce of remifentanil may be adjusted to prevent emergence cough when used in combination with dexmedetomidine. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03622502, August 9, 2018). BioMed Central 2021-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8094520/ /pubmed/33941098 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01358-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kim, Ha Yeon
Kwak, Hyun Jeong
Lee, Dongchul
Lee, Ji Hyea
Min, Sang Kee
Kim, Jong Yeop
Comparison of remifentanil concentrations with and without dexmedetomidine for the prevention of emergence cough after nasal surgery: a randomized double-blinded trial
title Comparison of remifentanil concentrations with and without dexmedetomidine for the prevention of emergence cough after nasal surgery: a randomized double-blinded trial
title_full Comparison of remifentanil concentrations with and without dexmedetomidine for the prevention of emergence cough after nasal surgery: a randomized double-blinded trial
title_fullStr Comparison of remifentanil concentrations with and without dexmedetomidine for the prevention of emergence cough after nasal surgery: a randomized double-blinded trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of remifentanil concentrations with and without dexmedetomidine for the prevention of emergence cough after nasal surgery: a randomized double-blinded trial
title_short Comparison of remifentanil concentrations with and without dexmedetomidine for the prevention of emergence cough after nasal surgery: a randomized double-blinded trial
title_sort comparison of remifentanil concentrations with and without dexmedetomidine for the prevention of emergence cough after nasal surgery: a randomized double-blinded trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8094520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33941098
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01358-x
work_keys_str_mv AT kimhayeon comparisonofremifentanilconcentrationswithandwithoutdexmedetomidineforthepreventionofemergencecoughafternasalsurgeryarandomizeddoubleblindedtrial
AT kwakhyunjeong comparisonofremifentanilconcentrationswithandwithoutdexmedetomidineforthepreventionofemergencecoughafternasalsurgeryarandomizeddoubleblindedtrial
AT leedongchul comparisonofremifentanilconcentrationswithandwithoutdexmedetomidineforthepreventionofemergencecoughafternasalsurgeryarandomizeddoubleblindedtrial
AT leejihyea comparisonofremifentanilconcentrationswithandwithoutdexmedetomidineforthepreventionofemergencecoughafternasalsurgeryarandomizeddoubleblindedtrial
AT minsangkee comparisonofremifentanilconcentrationswithandwithoutdexmedetomidineforthepreventionofemergencecoughafternasalsurgeryarandomizeddoubleblindedtrial
AT kimjongyeop comparisonofremifentanilconcentrationswithandwithoutdexmedetomidineforthepreventionofemergencecoughafternasalsurgeryarandomizeddoubleblindedtrial