Cargando…

Laboratory analysis and ray visualization of diffractive optics with enhanced intermediate vision

BACKGROUND: To assess the optical behavior of a new diffractive intraocular lens (IOL) and compare its performance to that of an established extended-depth-of-focus (EDOF) IOL. METHODS: This study assessed the Proming EDOF Multifocal AM2UX [Eyebright Medical Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd., China] an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Son, Hyeck-Soo, Łabuz, Grzegorz, Khoramnia, Ramin, Yildirim, Timur M., Auffarth, Gerd U.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8094553/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33941125
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-021-01958-8
_version_ 1783687991744528384
author Son, Hyeck-Soo
Łabuz, Grzegorz
Khoramnia, Ramin
Yildirim, Timur M.
Auffarth, Gerd U.
author_facet Son, Hyeck-Soo
Łabuz, Grzegorz
Khoramnia, Ramin
Yildirim, Timur M.
Auffarth, Gerd U.
author_sort Son, Hyeck-Soo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To assess the optical behavior of a new diffractive intraocular lens (IOL) and compare its performance to that of an established extended-depth-of-focus (EDOF) IOL. METHODS: This study assessed the Proming EDOF Multifocal AM2UX [Eyebright Medical Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd., China] and the AT LARA 829MP [Carl Zeiss Meditec, Germany]. An experimental set-up with 0.01% fluorescein solution and monochromatic light (532 nm) was used to visualize the IOLs’ ray propagation. In addition, the optical quality of the IOLs was assessed by measuring the modulation transfer function (MTF) values at 50lp/mm and 3.0 and 4.5 mm apertures on the optical bench OptiSpheric® IOL PRO II [Trioptics GmbH, Germany]. RESULTS: The ray propagation of the two IOLs showed two distinct foci. Light intensity assessment revealed that both IOLs allocate more energy to primary than secondary focus. At 3.0 mm pupil, the MTF values at 50lp/mm for the primary focus were 0.39 and 0.37, and for the secondary focus, 0.29 and 0.26 for the AT LARA and Proming IOLs, respectively. At 4.5 mm pupil, the single-frequency MTF for the primary focus was 0.51 and 0.24 and for the secondary focus 0.21 and 0.15 for the AT LARA and Proming IOLs, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: When tested with an aberration-free model cornea under monochromatic conditions, the Proming behaved as a low-add bifocal lens; however, its properties did not differ much from the well-established AT LARA EDOF IOL. The AT LARA outperformed the Proming at low defocus (up to 2D), while the latter demonstrated better image quality in the 2-3D range.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8094553
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80945532021-05-05 Laboratory analysis and ray visualization of diffractive optics with enhanced intermediate vision Son, Hyeck-Soo Łabuz, Grzegorz Khoramnia, Ramin Yildirim, Timur M. Auffarth, Gerd U. BMC Ophthalmol Research BACKGROUND: To assess the optical behavior of a new diffractive intraocular lens (IOL) and compare its performance to that of an established extended-depth-of-focus (EDOF) IOL. METHODS: This study assessed the Proming EDOF Multifocal AM2UX [Eyebright Medical Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd., China] and the AT LARA 829MP [Carl Zeiss Meditec, Germany]. An experimental set-up with 0.01% fluorescein solution and monochromatic light (532 nm) was used to visualize the IOLs’ ray propagation. In addition, the optical quality of the IOLs was assessed by measuring the modulation transfer function (MTF) values at 50lp/mm and 3.0 and 4.5 mm apertures on the optical bench OptiSpheric® IOL PRO II [Trioptics GmbH, Germany]. RESULTS: The ray propagation of the two IOLs showed two distinct foci. Light intensity assessment revealed that both IOLs allocate more energy to primary than secondary focus. At 3.0 mm pupil, the MTF values at 50lp/mm for the primary focus were 0.39 and 0.37, and for the secondary focus, 0.29 and 0.26 for the AT LARA and Proming IOLs, respectively. At 4.5 mm pupil, the single-frequency MTF for the primary focus was 0.51 and 0.24 and for the secondary focus 0.21 and 0.15 for the AT LARA and Proming IOLs, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: When tested with an aberration-free model cornea under monochromatic conditions, the Proming behaved as a low-add bifocal lens; however, its properties did not differ much from the well-established AT LARA EDOF IOL. The AT LARA outperformed the Proming at low defocus (up to 2D), while the latter demonstrated better image quality in the 2-3D range. BioMed Central 2021-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8094553/ /pubmed/33941125 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-021-01958-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Son, Hyeck-Soo
Łabuz, Grzegorz
Khoramnia, Ramin
Yildirim, Timur M.
Auffarth, Gerd U.
Laboratory analysis and ray visualization of diffractive optics with enhanced intermediate vision
title Laboratory analysis and ray visualization of diffractive optics with enhanced intermediate vision
title_full Laboratory analysis and ray visualization of diffractive optics with enhanced intermediate vision
title_fullStr Laboratory analysis and ray visualization of diffractive optics with enhanced intermediate vision
title_full_unstemmed Laboratory analysis and ray visualization of diffractive optics with enhanced intermediate vision
title_short Laboratory analysis and ray visualization of diffractive optics with enhanced intermediate vision
title_sort laboratory analysis and ray visualization of diffractive optics with enhanced intermediate vision
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8094553/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33941125
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-021-01958-8
work_keys_str_mv AT sonhyecksoo laboratoryanalysisandrayvisualizationofdiffractiveopticswithenhancedintermediatevision
AT łabuzgrzegorz laboratoryanalysisandrayvisualizationofdiffractiveopticswithenhancedintermediatevision
AT khoramniaramin laboratoryanalysisandrayvisualizationofdiffractiveopticswithenhancedintermediatevision
AT yildirimtimurm laboratoryanalysisandrayvisualizationofdiffractiveopticswithenhancedintermediatevision
AT auffarthgerdu laboratoryanalysisandrayvisualizationofdiffractiveopticswithenhancedintermediatevision