Cargando…
Fidelity to an evidence-based model for crisis resolution teams: a cross-sectional multicentre study in Norway
BACKGROUND: Crisis resolution teams (CRTs) are specialized multidisciplinary teams intended to provide assessment and short-term outpatient or home treatment as an alternative to hospital admission for people experiencing a mental health crisis. In Norway, CRTs have been established within mental he...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8094557/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33947362 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-021-03237-8 |
_version_ | 1783687992441831424 |
---|---|
author | Hasselberg, N. Holgersen, K. H. Uverud, G. M. Siqveland, J. Lloyd-Evans, B. Johnson, S. Ruud, T. |
author_facet | Hasselberg, N. Holgersen, K. H. Uverud, G. M. Siqveland, J. Lloyd-Evans, B. Johnson, S. Ruud, T. |
author_sort | Hasselberg, N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Crisis resolution teams (CRTs) are specialized multidisciplinary teams intended to provide assessment and short-term outpatient or home treatment as an alternative to hospital admission for people experiencing a mental health crisis. In Norway, CRTs have been established within mental health services throughout the country, but their fidelity to an evidence-based model for CRTs has been unknown. METHODS: We assessed fidelity to the evidence-based CRT model for 28 CRTs, using the CORE Crisis Resolution Team Fidelity Scale Version 2, a tool developed and first applied in the UK to measure adherence to a model of optimal CRT practice. The assessments were completed by evaluation teams based on written information, interviews, and review of patient records during a one-day visit with each CRT. RESULTS: The fidelity scale was applicable for assessing fidelity of Norwegian CRTs to the CRT model. On a scale 1 to 5, the mean fidelity score was low (2.75) and with a moderate variation of fidelity across the teams. The CRTs had highest scores on the content and delivery of care subscale, and lowest on the location and timing of care subscale. Scores were high on items measuring comprehensive assessment, psychological interventions, visit length, service users’ choice of location, and of type of support. However, scores were low on opening hours, gatekeeping acute psychiatric beds, facilitating early hospital discharge, intensity of contact, providing medication, and providing practical support. CONCLUSIONS: The CORE CRT Fidelity Scale was applicable and relevant to assessment of Norwegian CRTs and may be used to guide further development in clinical practice and research. Lower fidelity and differences in fidelity patterns compared to the UK teams may indicate that Norwegian teams are more focused on early interventions to a broader patient group and less on avoiding acute inpatient admissions for patients with severe mental illness. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8094557 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80945572021-05-05 Fidelity to an evidence-based model for crisis resolution teams: a cross-sectional multicentre study in Norway Hasselberg, N. Holgersen, K. H. Uverud, G. M. Siqveland, J. Lloyd-Evans, B. Johnson, S. Ruud, T. BMC Psychiatry Research BACKGROUND: Crisis resolution teams (CRTs) are specialized multidisciplinary teams intended to provide assessment and short-term outpatient or home treatment as an alternative to hospital admission for people experiencing a mental health crisis. In Norway, CRTs have been established within mental health services throughout the country, but their fidelity to an evidence-based model for CRTs has been unknown. METHODS: We assessed fidelity to the evidence-based CRT model for 28 CRTs, using the CORE Crisis Resolution Team Fidelity Scale Version 2, a tool developed and first applied in the UK to measure adherence to a model of optimal CRT practice. The assessments were completed by evaluation teams based on written information, interviews, and review of patient records during a one-day visit with each CRT. RESULTS: The fidelity scale was applicable for assessing fidelity of Norwegian CRTs to the CRT model. On a scale 1 to 5, the mean fidelity score was low (2.75) and with a moderate variation of fidelity across the teams. The CRTs had highest scores on the content and delivery of care subscale, and lowest on the location and timing of care subscale. Scores were high on items measuring comprehensive assessment, psychological interventions, visit length, service users’ choice of location, and of type of support. However, scores were low on opening hours, gatekeeping acute psychiatric beds, facilitating early hospital discharge, intensity of contact, providing medication, and providing practical support. CONCLUSIONS: The CORE CRT Fidelity Scale was applicable and relevant to assessment of Norwegian CRTs and may be used to guide further development in clinical practice and research. Lower fidelity and differences in fidelity patterns compared to the UK teams may indicate that Norwegian teams are more focused on early interventions to a broader patient group and less on avoiding acute inpatient admissions for patients with severe mental illness. BioMed Central 2021-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8094557/ /pubmed/33947362 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-021-03237-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Hasselberg, N. Holgersen, K. H. Uverud, G. M. Siqveland, J. Lloyd-Evans, B. Johnson, S. Ruud, T. Fidelity to an evidence-based model for crisis resolution teams: a cross-sectional multicentre study in Norway |
title | Fidelity to an evidence-based model for crisis resolution teams: a cross-sectional multicentre study in Norway |
title_full | Fidelity to an evidence-based model for crisis resolution teams: a cross-sectional multicentre study in Norway |
title_fullStr | Fidelity to an evidence-based model for crisis resolution teams: a cross-sectional multicentre study in Norway |
title_full_unstemmed | Fidelity to an evidence-based model for crisis resolution teams: a cross-sectional multicentre study in Norway |
title_short | Fidelity to an evidence-based model for crisis resolution teams: a cross-sectional multicentre study in Norway |
title_sort | fidelity to an evidence-based model for crisis resolution teams: a cross-sectional multicentre study in norway |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8094557/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33947362 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-021-03237-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hasselbergn fidelitytoanevidencebasedmodelforcrisisresolutionteamsacrosssectionalmulticentrestudyinnorway AT holgersenkh fidelitytoanevidencebasedmodelforcrisisresolutionteamsacrosssectionalmulticentrestudyinnorway AT uverudgm fidelitytoanevidencebasedmodelforcrisisresolutionteamsacrosssectionalmulticentrestudyinnorway AT siqvelandj fidelitytoanevidencebasedmodelforcrisisresolutionteamsacrosssectionalmulticentrestudyinnorway AT lloydevansb fidelitytoanevidencebasedmodelforcrisisresolutionteamsacrosssectionalmulticentrestudyinnorway AT johnsons fidelitytoanevidencebasedmodelforcrisisresolutionteamsacrosssectionalmulticentrestudyinnorway AT ruudt fidelitytoanevidencebasedmodelforcrisisresolutionteamsacrosssectionalmulticentrestudyinnorway |