Cargando…

Role of laser ablation in recalcitrant instent restenosis post iliofemoral venous stenting

Instent restenosis (ISR) represents the most common reason for recurrent symptoms requiring reintervention in patients who have undergone venous stenting for chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction. Treatment of ISR requires stent angioplasty typically using angioplasty balloons equal to or larger th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jayaraj, Arjun, Fuller, Robert, Raju, Seshadri
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8094898/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33997578
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvscit.2021.03.004
_version_ 1783688004545544192
author Jayaraj, Arjun
Fuller, Robert
Raju, Seshadri
author_facet Jayaraj, Arjun
Fuller, Robert
Raju, Seshadri
author_sort Jayaraj, Arjun
collection PubMed
description Instent restenosis (ISR) represents the most common reason for recurrent symptoms requiring reintervention in patients who have undergone venous stenting for chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction. Treatment of ISR requires stent angioplasty typically using angioplasty balloons equal to or larger than the rated diameter of the stent. At times this does not yield the required result, and in these patients, utilization of a laser catheter supported by an angled sheath is helpful to ablate the ISR or make it more amenable to repeat balloon angioplasty. The authors report their experience with this technique for 18 patients with recurrent symptoms impacting quality of life as a result of recalcitrant ISR in this retrospective review of contemporaneously entered electronic medical record data. 12 (67%) limbs underwent laser ablation only, while 6 (33%) limbs underwent additional angioplasty post laser ablation. Post intervention for ISR, at 12 months, the venous clinical severity score improved from 5 to 3.5 (P = .0005) and the VAS pain score went from 7 to 5 (P = .0005). At 10 months, primary patency was 87% and primary assisted patency was 100%. There were no stent occlusions. Laser ablation of recalcitrant instent restenosis in patients presenting with recurrent chronic iliac venous obstruction post iliofemoral venous stenting is a safe and effective option. Corroboration from larger studies is warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8094898
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80948982021-05-13 Role of laser ablation in recalcitrant instent restenosis post iliofemoral venous stenting Jayaraj, Arjun Fuller, Robert Raju, Seshadri J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech Innovative technique Instent restenosis (ISR) represents the most common reason for recurrent symptoms requiring reintervention in patients who have undergone venous stenting for chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction. Treatment of ISR requires stent angioplasty typically using angioplasty balloons equal to or larger than the rated diameter of the stent. At times this does not yield the required result, and in these patients, utilization of a laser catheter supported by an angled sheath is helpful to ablate the ISR or make it more amenable to repeat balloon angioplasty. The authors report their experience with this technique for 18 patients with recurrent symptoms impacting quality of life as a result of recalcitrant ISR in this retrospective review of contemporaneously entered electronic medical record data. 12 (67%) limbs underwent laser ablation only, while 6 (33%) limbs underwent additional angioplasty post laser ablation. Post intervention for ISR, at 12 months, the venous clinical severity score improved from 5 to 3.5 (P = .0005) and the VAS pain score went from 7 to 5 (P = .0005). At 10 months, primary patency was 87% and primary assisted patency was 100%. There were no stent occlusions. Laser ablation of recalcitrant instent restenosis in patients presenting with recurrent chronic iliac venous obstruction post iliofemoral venous stenting is a safe and effective option. Corroboration from larger studies is warranted. Elsevier 2021-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8094898/ /pubmed/33997578 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvscit.2021.03.004 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Innovative technique
Jayaraj, Arjun
Fuller, Robert
Raju, Seshadri
Role of laser ablation in recalcitrant instent restenosis post iliofemoral venous stenting
title Role of laser ablation in recalcitrant instent restenosis post iliofemoral venous stenting
title_full Role of laser ablation in recalcitrant instent restenosis post iliofemoral venous stenting
title_fullStr Role of laser ablation in recalcitrant instent restenosis post iliofemoral venous stenting
title_full_unstemmed Role of laser ablation in recalcitrant instent restenosis post iliofemoral venous stenting
title_short Role of laser ablation in recalcitrant instent restenosis post iliofemoral venous stenting
title_sort role of laser ablation in recalcitrant instent restenosis post iliofemoral venous stenting
topic Innovative technique
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8094898/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33997578
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvscit.2021.03.004
work_keys_str_mv AT jayarajarjun roleoflaserablationinrecalcitrantinstentrestenosispostiliofemoralvenousstenting
AT fullerrobert roleoflaserablationinrecalcitrantinstentrestenosispostiliofemoralvenousstenting
AT rajuseshadri roleoflaserablationinrecalcitrantinstentrestenosispostiliofemoralvenousstenting