Cargando…

Examining the Factor Structure of the DSM-5 Level 1 Cross-Cutting Symptom Measure

OBJECTIVES: The DSM-5 Level 1 Cross-Cutting Symptom Measure (DSM-XC) is a transdiagnostic mental health symptom measure that has shown promise in informing clinical diagnostic evaluations and as a screening tool for research. However, few studies have assessed the latent dimensionality of the DSM-XC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gibbons, Alison, Farmer, Cristan, Shaw, Jacob S, Chung, Joyce Y
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8095225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33948606
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.28.21256253
_version_ 1783688043457150976
author Gibbons, Alison
Farmer, Cristan
Shaw, Jacob S
Chung, Joyce Y
author_facet Gibbons, Alison
Farmer, Cristan
Shaw, Jacob S
Chung, Joyce Y
author_sort Gibbons, Alison
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The DSM-5 Level 1 Cross-Cutting Symptom Measure (DSM-XC) is a transdiagnostic mental health symptom measure that has shown promise in informing clinical diagnostic evaluations and as a screening tool for research. However, few studies have assessed the latent dimensionality of the DSM-XC. We examined the factor structure of the DSM-XC in a large convenience sample of participants with varying degrees of psychological health. METHODS: Participants (n=3533) enrolled in a protocol conducted at the National Institute of Mental Health (NCT04339790). We used a factor analytic framework to evaluate an existing two-factor solution (Lace & Merz, 2020) and two additional candidate solutions. RESULTS: The Lace and Merz solution had acceptable fit. Exploratory factor analysis yielded two candidate solutions: a six-factor (characterized as mood, worry, activation, somatic, thoughts, and substance use) and a bifactor (general factor of non-specific psychopathology, residual factors characterized as internalizing and thought disorder), which both had good fit and full measurement invariance across age, sex, and enrollment date. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings confirm that the DSM-XC may be conceptualized as a multidimensional instrument and provide a scoring solution for researchers who wish to measure distinct constructs. Future research on the psychometric profile of the DSM-XC is needed, focused on the validity of these candidate solutions and their performance across research populations and settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8095225
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80952252021-05-05 Examining the Factor Structure of the DSM-5 Level 1 Cross-Cutting Symptom Measure Gibbons, Alison Farmer, Cristan Shaw, Jacob S Chung, Joyce Y medRxiv Article OBJECTIVES: The DSM-5 Level 1 Cross-Cutting Symptom Measure (DSM-XC) is a transdiagnostic mental health symptom measure that has shown promise in informing clinical diagnostic evaluations and as a screening tool for research. However, few studies have assessed the latent dimensionality of the DSM-XC. We examined the factor structure of the DSM-XC in a large convenience sample of participants with varying degrees of psychological health. METHODS: Participants (n=3533) enrolled in a protocol conducted at the National Institute of Mental Health (NCT04339790). We used a factor analytic framework to evaluate an existing two-factor solution (Lace & Merz, 2020) and two additional candidate solutions. RESULTS: The Lace and Merz solution had acceptable fit. Exploratory factor analysis yielded two candidate solutions: a six-factor (characterized as mood, worry, activation, somatic, thoughts, and substance use) and a bifactor (general factor of non-specific psychopathology, residual factors characterized as internalizing and thought disorder), which both had good fit and full measurement invariance across age, sex, and enrollment date. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings confirm that the DSM-XC may be conceptualized as a multidimensional instrument and provide a scoring solution for researchers who wish to measure distinct constructs. Future research on the psychometric profile of the DSM-XC is needed, focused on the validity of these candidate solutions and their performance across research populations and settings. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2021-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8095225/ /pubmed/33948606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.28.21256253 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/This article is a US Government work. It is not subject to copyright under 17 USC 105 and is also made available for use under a CC0 license (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Gibbons, Alison
Farmer, Cristan
Shaw, Jacob S
Chung, Joyce Y
Examining the Factor Structure of the DSM-5 Level 1 Cross-Cutting Symptom Measure
title Examining the Factor Structure of the DSM-5 Level 1 Cross-Cutting Symptom Measure
title_full Examining the Factor Structure of the DSM-5 Level 1 Cross-Cutting Symptom Measure
title_fullStr Examining the Factor Structure of the DSM-5 Level 1 Cross-Cutting Symptom Measure
title_full_unstemmed Examining the Factor Structure of the DSM-5 Level 1 Cross-Cutting Symptom Measure
title_short Examining the Factor Structure of the DSM-5 Level 1 Cross-Cutting Symptom Measure
title_sort examining the factor structure of the dsm-5 level 1 cross-cutting symptom measure
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8095225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33948606
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.28.21256253
work_keys_str_mv AT gibbonsalison examiningthefactorstructureofthedsm5level1crosscuttingsymptommeasure
AT farmercristan examiningthefactorstructureofthedsm5level1crosscuttingsymptommeasure
AT shawjacobs examiningthefactorstructureofthedsm5level1crosscuttingsymptommeasure
AT chungjoycey examiningthefactorstructureofthedsm5level1crosscuttingsymptommeasure