Cargando…
Examining the Factor Structure of the DSM-5 Level 1 Cross-Cutting Symptom Measure
OBJECTIVES: The DSM-5 Level 1 Cross-Cutting Symptom Measure (DSM-XC) is a transdiagnostic mental health symptom measure that has shown promise in informing clinical diagnostic evaluations and as a screening tool for research. However, few studies have assessed the latent dimensionality of the DSM-XC...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8095225/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33948606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.28.21256253 |
_version_ | 1783688043457150976 |
---|---|
author | Gibbons, Alison Farmer, Cristan Shaw, Jacob S Chung, Joyce Y |
author_facet | Gibbons, Alison Farmer, Cristan Shaw, Jacob S Chung, Joyce Y |
author_sort | Gibbons, Alison |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The DSM-5 Level 1 Cross-Cutting Symptom Measure (DSM-XC) is a transdiagnostic mental health symptom measure that has shown promise in informing clinical diagnostic evaluations and as a screening tool for research. However, few studies have assessed the latent dimensionality of the DSM-XC. We examined the factor structure of the DSM-XC in a large convenience sample of participants with varying degrees of psychological health. METHODS: Participants (n=3533) enrolled in a protocol conducted at the National Institute of Mental Health (NCT04339790). We used a factor analytic framework to evaluate an existing two-factor solution (Lace & Merz, 2020) and two additional candidate solutions. RESULTS: The Lace and Merz solution had acceptable fit. Exploratory factor analysis yielded two candidate solutions: a six-factor (characterized as mood, worry, activation, somatic, thoughts, and substance use) and a bifactor (general factor of non-specific psychopathology, residual factors characterized as internalizing and thought disorder), which both had good fit and full measurement invariance across age, sex, and enrollment date. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings confirm that the DSM-XC may be conceptualized as a multidimensional instrument and provide a scoring solution for researchers who wish to measure distinct constructs. Future research on the psychometric profile of the DSM-XC is needed, focused on the validity of these candidate solutions and their performance across research populations and settings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8095225 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80952252021-05-05 Examining the Factor Structure of the DSM-5 Level 1 Cross-Cutting Symptom Measure Gibbons, Alison Farmer, Cristan Shaw, Jacob S Chung, Joyce Y medRxiv Article OBJECTIVES: The DSM-5 Level 1 Cross-Cutting Symptom Measure (DSM-XC) is a transdiagnostic mental health symptom measure that has shown promise in informing clinical diagnostic evaluations and as a screening tool for research. However, few studies have assessed the latent dimensionality of the DSM-XC. We examined the factor structure of the DSM-XC in a large convenience sample of participants with varying degrees of psychological health. METHODS: Participants (n=3533) enrolled in a protocol conducted at the National Institute of Mental Health (NCT04339790). We used a factor analytic framework to evaluate an existing two-factor solution (Lace & Merz, 2020) and two additional candidate solutions. RESULTS: The Lace and Merz solution had acceptable fit. Exploratory factor analysis yielded two candidate solutions: a six-factor (characterized as mood, worry, activation, somatic, thoughts, and substance use) and a bifactor (general factor of non-specific psychopathology, residual factors characterized as internalizing and thought disorder), which both had good fit and full measurement invariance across age, sex, and enrollment date. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings confirm that the DSM-XC may be conceptualized as a multidimensional instrument and provide a scoring solution for researchers who wish to measure distinct constructs. Future research on the psychometric profile of the DSM-XC is needed, focused on the validity of these candidate solutions and their performance across research populations and settings. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2021-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8095225/ /pubmed/33948606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.28.21256253 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/This article is a US Government work. It is not subject to copyright under 17 USC 105 and is also made available for use under a CC0 license (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Gibbons, Alison Farmer, Cristan Shaw, Jacob S Chung, Joyce Y Examining the Factor Structure of the DSM-5 Level 1 Cross-Cutting Symptom Measure |
title | Examining the Factor Structure of the DSM-5 Level 1 Cross-Cutting Symptom Measure |
title_full | Examining the Factor Structure of the DSM-5 Level 1 Cross-Cutting Symptom Measure |
title_fullStr | Examining the Factor Structure of the DSM-5 Level 1 Cross-Cutting Symptom Measure |
title_full_unstemmed | Examining the Factor Structure of the DSM-5 Level 1 Cross-Cutting Symptom Measure |
title_short | Examining the Factor Structure of the DSM-5 Level 1 Cross-Cutting Symptom Measure |
title_sort | examining the factor structure of the dsm-5 level 1 cross-cutting symptom measure |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8095225/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33948606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.28.21256253 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gibbonsalison examiningthefactorstructureofthedsm5level1crosscuttingsymptommeasure AT farmercristan examiningthefactorstructureofthedsm5level1crosscuttingsymptommeasure AT shawjacobs examiningthefactorstructureofthedsm5level1crosscuttingsymptommeasure AT chungjoycey examiningthefactorstructureofthedsm5level1crosscuttingsymptommeasure |