Cargando…

Implementing Smart Working in Public Administration: a follow up study

BACKGROUND: Starting from February 2020, in Italy most organizations have had a forced transition to flexible working practice - called “smart working in emergency” – due to the Covid-19 epidemic outbreak. This allowed to continue work activities and services and contributed to contain the risk of i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Di Tecco, Cristina, Ronchetti, Matteo, Russo, Simone, Ghelli, Monica, Rondinone, Bruna Maria, Persechino, Benedetta, Iavicoli, Sergio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mattioli 1885 srl 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8095324/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33881008
http://dx.doi.org/10.23749/mdl.v112i2.10595
_version_ 1783688056840126464
author Di Tecco, Cristina
Ronchetti, Matteo
Russo, Simone
Ghelli, Monica
Rondinone, Bruna Maria
Persechino, Benedetta
Iavicoli, Sergio
author_facet Di Tecco, Cristina
Ronchetti, Matteo
Russo, Simone
Ghelli, Monica
Rondinone, Bruna Maria
Persechino, Benedetta
Iavicoli, Sergio
author_sort Di Tecco, Cristina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Starting from February 2020, in Italy most organizations have had a forced transition to flexible working practice - called “smart working in emergency” – due to the Covid-19 epidemic outbreak. This allowed to continue work activities and services and contributed to contain the risk of infection in different sectors, particularly in the public administration. OBJECTIVES: This follow up study focussed on a panel of 187 workers from the Italian Workers’ Compensation Authority taking part to a pilot project “Smart Working in INAIL” from January 2019 to December 2019. The aim was to investigate the effects of work organization on work attitudes, work-life balance and health outcomes before and after the introduction of the smart working. METHODS: The data were collected at two time points through a web-based questionnaire. The first wave aimed to collect information up to one month before the implementation of the smart working. The second wave aimed to collect information about potential changes occurred after one year of smart working. RESULTS: This study showed that high demands, low control and low social support might lead to reduced well-being and less satisfaction with work, and have an effect on work engagement and work-life balance. Particularly, improving social support can moderate the negative impact of high strain on well-being, preventing work-life imbalance and risk of isolation. DISCUSSION: Findings and future perspectives are discussed to support stakeholders in defining policies and practices concerning health and wellbeing at work while preserving productivity, for a successful implementation of smart working in the public administration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8095324
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Mattioli 1885 srl
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80953242021-05-05 Implementing Smart Working in Public Administration: a follow up study Di Tecco, Cristina Ronchetti, Matteo Russo, Simone Ghelli, Monica Rondinone, Bruna Maria Persechino, Benedetta Iavicoli, Sergio Med Lav Original Article BACKGROUND: Starting from February 2020, in Italy most organizations have had a forced transition to flexible working practice - called “smart working in emergency” – due to the Covid-19 epidemic outbreak. This allowed to continue work activities and services and contributed to contain the risk of infection in different sectors, particularly in the public administration. OBJECTIVES: This follow up study focussed on a panel of 187 workers from the Italian Workers’ Compensation Authority taking part to a pilot project “Smart Working in INAIL” from January 2019 to December 2019. The aim was to investigate the effects of work organization on work attitudes, work-life balance and health outcomes before and after the introduction of the smart working. METHODS: The data were collected at two time points through a web-based questionnaire. The first wave aimed to collect information up to one month before the implementation of the smart working. The second wave aimed to collect information about potential changes occurred after one year of smart working. RESULTS: This study showed that high demands, low control and low social support might lead to reduced well-being and less satisfaction with work, and have an effect on work engagement and work-life balance. Particularly, improving social support can moderate the negative impact of high strain on well-being, preventing work-life imbalance and risk of isolation. DISCUSSION: Findings and future perspectives are discussed to support stakeholders in defining policies and practices concerning health and wellbeing at work while preserving productivity, for a successful implementation of smart working in the public administration. Mattioli 1885 srl 2021 2021-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8095324/ /pubmed/33881008 http://dx.doi.org/10.23749/mdl.v112i2.10595 Text en Copyright: © 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
spellingShingle Original Article
Di Tecco, Cristina
Ronchetti, Matteo
Russo, Simone
Ghelli, Monica
Rondinone, Bruna Maria
Persechino, Benedetta
Iavicoli, Sergio
Implementing Smart Working in Public Administration: a follow up study
title Implementing Smart Working in Public Administration: a follow up study
title_full Implementing Smart Working in Public Administration: a follow up study
title_fullStr Implementing Smart Working in Public Administration: a follow up study
title_full_unstemmed Implementing Smart Working in Public Administration: a follow up study
title_short Implementing Smart Working in Public Administration: a follow up study
title_sort implementing smart working in public administration: a follow up study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8095324/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33881008
http://dx.doi.org/10.23749/mdl.v112i2.10595
work_keys_str_mv AT diteccocristina implementingsmartworkinginpublicadministrationafollowupstudy
AT ronchettimatteo implementingsmartworkinginpublicadministrationafollowupstudy
AT russosimone implementingsmartworkinginpublicadministrationafollowupstudy
AT ghellimonica implementingsmartworkinginpublicadministrationafollowupstudy
AT rondinonebrunamaria implementingsmartworkinginpublicadministrationafollowupstudy
AT persechinobenedetta implementingsmartworkinginpublicadministrationafollowupstudy
AT iavicolisergio implementingsmartworkinginpublicadministrationafollowupstudy