Cargando…
Comparative analysis of bond strength and microleakage of newer generation bonding agents to enamel and dentin: An in vitro study
AIMS: This study aims to evaluate the bond strength (BS) and microleakage (ML) of the newer bonding agents to enamel and dentin. OBJECTIVE: (1) To analyze the BS between self-etch and total-etch adhesives. (2) To analyze the depth of ML between self-etch and total-etch adhesives. MATERIALS AND METHO...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8095691/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34083915 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_572_20 |
_version_ | 1783688077749780480 |
---|---|
author | Hegde, Nishmitha Attavar, Shruthi Hegde, Mithra N Hegde, Nidarsh D. |
author_facet | Hegde, Nishmitha Attavar, Shruthi Hegde, Mithra N Hegde, Nidarsh D. |
author_sort | Hegde, Nishmitha |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: This study aims to evaluate the bond strength (BS) and microleakage (ML) of the newer bonding agents to enamel and dentin. OBJECTIVE: (1) To analyze the BS between self-etch and total-etch adhesives. (2) To analyze the depth of ML between self-etch and total-etch adhesives. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty mandibular premolars were fabricated and randomly divided into three groups: Group I (n = 20)-bonded with self-etch adhesive + nanohybrid, Group II (n = 20) with total-etch adhesive + micro hybrid and Group III (n = 20) with total-etch adhesive + nanocomposite. Teflon ring molds were used to make composite resin cylinders bonded to the buccal surface. Class II box cavity was prepared on the samples' proximal surface and condensed with composite resin with each group's specific bonding protocol. Shear BS and ML testing were conducted, and data analyzed. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Kruskal–Wallis analysis was done to statistically differentiate the BS and ML between the three experimental groups; the P < 0.05, it showed a statistically significant difference. Intergroup comparison was made using the Mann–Whitney U test. CONCLUSIONS: Within this study's limitation, resin bonded with self-etch G-Premio Bond used in selective etch technique showed the highest BS and resistance to ML. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8095691 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80956912021-06-02 Comparative analysis of bond strength and microleakage of newer generation bonding agents to enamel and dentin: An in vitro study Hegde, Nishmitha Attavar, Shruthi Hegde, Mithra N Hegde, Nidarsh D. J Conserv Dent Original Article AIMS: This study aims to evaluate the bond strength (BS) and microleakage (ML) of the newer bonding agents to enamel and dentin. OBJECTIVE: (1) To analyze the BS between self-etch and total-etch adhesives. (2) To analyze the depth of ML between self-etch and total-etch adhesives. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty mandibular premolars were fabricated and randomly divided into three groups: Group I (n = 20)-bonded with self-etch adhesive + nanohybrid, Group II (n = 20) with total-etch adhesive + micro hybrid and Group III (n = 20) with total-etch adhesive + nanocomposite. Teflon ring molds were used to make composite resin cylinders bonded to the buccal surface. Class II box cavity was prepared on the samples' proximal surface and condensed with composite resin with each group's specific bonding protocol. Shear BS and ML testing were conducted, and data analyzed. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Kruskal–Wallis analysis was done to statistically differentiate the BS and ML between the three experimental groups; the P < 0.05, it showed a statistically significant difference. Intergroup comparison was made using the Mann–Whitney U test. CONCLUSIONS: Within this study's limitation, resin bonded with self-etch G-Premio Bond used in selective etch technique showed the highest BS and resistance to ML. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020 2021-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8095691/ /pubmed/34083915 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_572_20 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Journal of Conservative Dentistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Hegde, Nishmitha Attavar, Shruthi Hegde, Mithra N Hegde, Nidarsh D. Comparative analysis of bond strength and microleakage of newer generation bonding agents to enamel and dentin: An in vitro study |
title | Comparative analysis of bond strength and microleakage of newer generation bonding agents to enamel and dentin: An in vitro study |
title_full | Comparative analysis of bond strength and microleakage of newer generation bonding agents to enamel and dentin: An in vitro study |
title_fullStr | Comparative analysis of bond strength and microleakage of newer generation bonding agents to enamel and dentin: An in vitro study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative analysis of bond strength and microleakage of newer generation bonding agents to enamel and dentin: An in vitro study |
title_short | Comparative analysis of bond strength and microleakage of newer generation bonding agents to enamel and dentin: An in vitro study |
title_sort | comparative analysis of bond strength and microleakage of newer generation bonding agents to enamel and dentin: an in vitro study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8095691/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34083915 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_572_20 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hegdenishmitha comparativeanalysisofbondstrengthandmicroleakageofnewergenerationbondingagentstoenamelanddentinaninvitrostudy AT attavarshruthi comparativeanalysisofbondstrengthandmicroleakageofnewergenerationbondingagentstoenamelanddentinaninvitrostudy AT hegdemithran comparativeanalysisofbondstrengthandmicroleakageofnewergenerationbondingagentstoenamelanddentinaninvitrostudy AT hegdenidarshd comparativeanalysisofbondstrengthandmicroleakageofnewergenerationbondingagentstoenamelanddentinaninvitrostudy |