Cargando…

Comparative analysis of bond strength and microleakage of newer generation bonding agents to enamel and dentin: An in vitro study

AIMS: This study aims to evaluate the bond strength (BS) and microleakage (ML) of the newer bonding agents to enamel and dentin. OBJECTIVE: (1) To analyze the BS between self-etch and total-etch adhesives. (2) To analyze the depth of ML between self-etch and total-etch adhesives. MATERIALS AND METHO...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hegde, Nishmitha, Attavar, Shruthi, Hegde, Mithra N, Hegde, Nidarsh D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8095691/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34083915
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_572_20
_version_ 1783688077749780480
author Hegde, Nishmitha
Attavar, Shruthi
Hegde, Mithra N
Hegde, Nidarsh D.
author_facet Hegde, Nishmitha
Attavar, Shruthi
Hegde, Mithra N
Hegde, Nidarsh D.
author_sort Hegde, Nishmitha
collection PubMed
description AIMS: This study aims to evaluate the bond strength (BS) and microleakage (ML) of the newer bonding agents to enamel and dentin. OBJECTIVE: (1) To analyze the BS between self-etch and total-etch adhesives. (2) To analyze the depth of ML between self-etch and total-etch adhesives. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty mandibular premolars were fabricated and randomly divided into three groups: Group I (n = 20)-bonded with self-etch adhesive + nanohybrid, Group II (n = 20) with total-etch adhesive + micro hybrid and Group III (n = 20) with total-etch adhesive + nanocomposite. Teflon ring molds were used to make composite resin cylinders bonded to the buccal surface. Class II box cavity was prepared on the samples' proximal surface and condensed with composite resin with each group's specific bonding protocol. Shear BS and ML testing were conducted, and data analyzed. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Kruskal–Wallis analysis was done to statistically differentiate the BS and ML between the three experimental groups; the P < 0.05, it showed a statistically significant difference. Intergroup comparison was made using the Mann–Whitney U test. CONCLUSIONS: Within this study's limitation, resin bonded with self-etch G-Premio Bond used in selective etch technique showed the highest BS and resistance to ML.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8095691
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80956912021-06-02 Comparative analysis of bond strength and microleakage of newer generation bonding agents to enamel and dentin: An in vitro study Hegde, Nishmitha Attavar, Shruthi Hegde, Mithra N Hegde, Nidarsh D. J Conserv Dent Original Article AIMS: This study aims to evaluate the bond strength (BS) and microleakage (ML) of the newer bonding agents to enamel and dentin. OBJECTIVE: (1) To analyze the BS between self-etch and total-etch adhesives. (2) To analyze the depth of ML between self-etch and total-etch adhesives. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty mandibular premolars were fabricated and randomly divided into three groups: Group I (n = 20)-bonded with self-etch adhesive + nanohybrid, Group II (n = 20) with total-etch adhesive + micro hybrid and Group III (n = 20) with total-etch adhesive + nanocomposite. Teflon ring molds were used to make composite resin cylinders bonded to the buccal surface. Class II box cavity was prepared on the samples' proximal surface and condensed with composite resin with each group's specific bonding protocol. Shear BS and ML testing were conducted, and data analyzed. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Kruskal–Wallis analysis was done to statistically differentiate the BS and ML between the three experimental groups; the P < 0.05, it showed a statistically significant difference. Intergroup comparison was made using the Mann–Whitney U test. CONCLUSIONS: Within this study's limitation, resin bonded with self-etch G-Premio Bond used in selective etch technique showed the highest BS and resistance to ML. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020 2021-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8095691/ /pubmed/34083915 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_572_20 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Journal of Conservative Dentistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Hegde, Nishmitha
Attavar, Shruthi
Hegde, Mithra N
Hegde, Nidarsh D.
Comparative analysis of bond strength and microleakage of newer generation bonding agents to enamel and dentin: An in vitro study
title Comparative analysis of bond strength and microleakage of newer generation bonding agents to enamel and dentin: An in vitro study
title_full Comparative analysis of bond strength and microleakage of newer generation bonding agents to enamel and dentin: An in vitro study
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of bond strength and microleakage of newer generation bonding agents to enamel and dentin: An in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of bond strength and microleakage of newer generation bonding agents to enamel and dentin: An in vitro study
title_short Comparative analysis of bond strength and microleakage of newer generation bonding agents to enamel and dentin: An in vitro study
title_sort comparative analysis of bond strength and microleakage of newer generation bonding agents to enamel and dentin: an in vitro study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8095691/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34083915
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_572_20
work_keys_str_mv AT hegdenishmitha comparativeanalysisofbondstrengthandmicroleakageofnewergenerationbondingagentstoenamelanddentinaninvitrostudy
AT attavarshruthi comparativeanalysisofbondstrengthandmicroleakageofnewergenerationbondingagentstoenamelanddentinaninvitrostudy
AT hegdemithran comparativeanalysisofbondstrengthandmicroleakageofnewergenerationbondingagentstoenamelanddentinaninvitrostudy
AT hegdenidarshd comparativeanalysisofbondstrengthandmicroleakageofnewergenerationbondingagentstoenamelanddentinaninvitrostudy