Cargando…

Deliberative democracy and historical perspectives on American Indian/Alaska native political decision-making practices

Public deliberation has risen to the forefront of governance as a technique for increasing participation in policy making. Scholars and practitioners have also noted the potential for deliberation to give greater influence to historically marginalized populations, such as Indigenous peoples. However...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reedy, Justin, Orr, Raymond, Spicer, Paul, Blanchard, Jessica W., Hiratsuka, Vanessa Y., Ketchum, Terry S., Saunkeah, Bobby, Wark, Kyle, Woodbury, R. Brian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8095723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33954295
http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0506-4
_version_ 1783688082909822976
author Reedy, Justin
Orr, Raymond
Spicer, Paul
Blanchard, Jessica W.
Hiratsuka, Vanessa Y.
Ketchum, Terry S.
Saunkeah, Bobby
Wark, Kyle
Woodbury, R. Brian
author_facet Reedy, Justin
Orr, Raymond
Spicer, Paul
Blanchard, Jessica W.
Hiratsuka, Vanessa Y.
Ketchum, Terry S.
Saunkeah, Bobby
Wark, Kyle
Woodbury, R. Brian
author_sort Reedy, Justin
collection PubMed
description Public deliberation has risen to the forefront of governance as a technique for increasing participation in policy making. Scholars and practitioners have also noted the potential for deliberation to give greater influence to historically marginalized populations, such as Indigenous peoples. However, there has been less attention paid to the potential fit between the ideals of deliberation and the governance and decision making practices of American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) peoples. In this paper, we begin to address this gap by analyzing accounts of AI/AN governance from the perspective of deliberation, and note areas of overlap, synergy, and conflict. We conduct a close reading of key historical and ethnographic accounts of four historical AI/AN contexts—the Iroquois Confederation under the Great Law of Peace, 19th century accounts of the Ojibwa village, the Santa Clara Pueblo government in pre-19th century, and Yup’ik village life in the early 20th century—and a more contemporary case in the form of the Santa Clara Pueblo’s Constitution from the Indian Reorganization Act period. We then apply two sets of key criteria for deliberative democracy—from the scholars Robert Dahl and John Gastil—to these accounts and note the ways in which each system is or is not congruent with these frameworks of deliberation. We find variations between these historical tribal contexts in our analysis. Social components of deliberation, such as respectful discussion and equal opportunities to participate, were partially or fully present in many accounts of governance practices, but it was less clear whether the analytic components, such as discussion of a range of solutions, were included in some forms of tribal governance. We then explore the potential implications of our findings for public deliberation within and in AI/AN tribes. We note that deliberative scholars and practitioners should be wary of over-generalizing about AI/AN tribes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8095723
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80957232021-05-04 Deliberative democracy and historical perspectives on American Indian/Alaska native political decision-making practices Reedy, Justin Orr, Raymond Spicer, Paul Blanchard, Jessica W. Hiratsuka, Vanessa Y. Ketchum, Terry S. Saunkeah, Bobby Wark, Kyle Woodbury, R. Brian Humanit Soc Sci Commun Article Public deliberation has risen to the forefront of governance as a technique for increasing participation in policy making. Scholars and practitioners have also noted the potential for deliberation to give greater influence to historically marginalized populations, such as Indigenous peoples. However, there has been less attention paid to the potential fit between the ideals of deliberation and the governance and decision making practices of American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) peoples. In this paper, we begin to address this gap by analyzing accounts of AI/AN governance from the perspective of deliberation, and note areas of overlap, synergy, and conflict. We conduct a close reading of key historical and ethnographic accounts of four historical AI/AN contexts—the Iroquois Confederation under the Great Law of Peace, 19th century accounts of the Ojibwa village, the Santa Clara Pueblo government in pre-19th century, and Yup’ik village life in the early 20th century—and a more contemporary case in the form of the Santa Clara Pueblo’s Constitution from the Indian Reorganization Act period. We then apply two sets of key criteria for deliberative democracy—from the scholars Robert Dahl and John Gastil—to these accounts and note the ways in which each system is or is not congruent with these frameworks of deliberation. We find variations between these historical tribal contexts in our analysis. Social components of deliberation, such as respectful discussion and equal opportunities to participate, were partially or fully present in many accounts of governance practices, but it was less clear whether the analytic components, such as discussion of a range of solutions, were included in some forms of tribal governance. We then explore the potential implications of our findings for public deliberation within and in AI/AN tribes. We note that deliberative scholars and practitioners should be wary of over-generalizing about AI/AN tribes. 2020-06-24 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC8095723/ /pubmed/33954295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0506-4 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . http://www.nature.com/reprintsReprints and permission information is available at http://www.nature.com/reprints
spellingShingle Article
Reedy, Justin
Orr, Raymond
Spicer, Paul
Blanchard, Jessica W.
Hiratsuka, Vanessa Y.
Ketchum, Terry S.
Saunkeah, Bobby
Wark, Kyle
Woodbury, R. Brian
Deliberative democracy and historical perspectives on American Indian/Alaska native political decision-making practices
title Deliberative democracy and historical perspectives on American Indian/Alaska native political decision-making practices
title_full Deliberative democracy and historical perspectives on American Indian/Alaska native political decision-making practices
title_fullStr Deliberative democracy and historical perspectives on American Indian/Alaska native political decision-making practices
title_full_unstemmed Deliberative democracy and historical perspectives on American Indian/Alaska native political decision-making practices
title_short Deliberative democracy and historical perspectives on American Indian/Alaska native political decision-making practices
title_sort deliberative democracy and historical perspectives on american indian/alaska native political decision-making practices
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8095723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33954295
http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0506-4
work_keys_str_mv AT reedyjustin deliberativedemocracyandhistoricalperspectivesonamericanindianalaskanativepoliticaldecisionmakingpractices
AT orrraymond deliberativedemocracyandhistoricalperspectivesonamericanindianalaskanativepoliticaldecisionmakingpractices
AT spicerpaul deliberativedemocracyandhistoricalperspectivesonamericanindianalaskanativepoliticaldecisionmakingpractices
AT blanchardjessicaw deliberativedemocracyandhistoricalperspectivesonamericanindianalaskanativepoliticaldecisionmakingpractices
AT hiratsukavanessay deliberativedemocracyandhistoricalperspectivesonamericanindianalaskanativepoliticaldecisionmakingpractices
AT ketchumterrys deliberativedemocracyandhistoricalperspectivesonamericanindianalaskanativepoliticaldecisionmakingpractices
AT saunkeahbobby deliberativedemocracyandhistoricalperspectivesonamericanindianalaskanativepoliticaldecisionmakingpractices
AT warkkyle deliberativedemocracyandhistoricalperspectivesonamericanindianalaskanativepoliticaldecisionmakingpractices
AT woodburyrbrian deliberativedemocracyandhistoricalperspectivesonamericanindianalaskanativepoliticaldecisionmakingpractices