Cargando…
Deliberative democracy and historical perspectives on American Indian/Alaska native political decision-making practices
Public deliberation has risen to the forefront of governance as a technique for increasing participation in policy making. Scholars and practitioners have also noted the potential for deliberation to give greater influence to historically marginalized populations, such as Indigenous peoples. However...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8095723/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33954295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0506-4 |
_version_ | 1783688082909822976 |
---|---|
author | Reedy, Justin Orr, Raymond Spicer, Paul Blanchard, Jessica W. Hiratsuka, Vanessa Y. Ketchum, Terry S. Saunkeah, Bobby Wark, Kyle Woodbury, R. Brian |
author_facet | Reedy, Justin Orr, Raymond Spicer, Paul Blanchard, Jessica W. Hiratsuka, Vanessa Y. Ketchum, Terry S. Saunkeah, Bobby Wark, Kyle Woodbury, R. Brian |
author_sort | Reedy, Justin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Public deliberation has risen to the forefront of governance as a technique for increasing participation in policy making. Scholars and practitioners have also noted the potential for deliberation to give greater influence to historically marginalized populations, such as Indigenous peoples. However, there has been less attention paid to the potential fit between the ideals of deliberation and the governance and decision making practices of American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) peoples. In this paper, we begin to address this gap by analyzing accounts of AI/AN governance from the perspective of deliberation, and note areas of overlap, synergy, and conflict. We conduct a close reading of key historical and ethnographic accounts of four historical AI/AN contexts—the Iroquois Confederation under the Great Law of Peace, 19th century accounts of the Ojibwa village, the Santa Clara Pueblo government in pre-19th century, and Yup’ik village life in the early 20th century—and a more contemporary case in the form of the Santa Clara Pueblo’s Constitution from the Indian Reorganization Act period. We then apply two sets of key criteria for deliberative democracy—from the scholars Robert Dahl and John Gastil—to these accounts and note the ways in which each system is or is not congruent with these frameworks of deliberation. We find variations between these historical tribal contexts in our analysis. Social components of deliberation, such as respectful discussion and equal opportunities to participate, were partially or fully present in many accounts of governance practices, but it was less clear whether the analytic components, such as discussion of a range of solutions, were included in some forms of tribal governance. We then explore the potential implications of our findings for public deliberation within and in AI/AN tribes. We note that deliberative scholars and practitioners should be wary of over-generalizing about AI/AN tribes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8095723 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80957232021-05-04 Deliberative democracy and historical perspectives on American Indian/Alaska native political decision-making practices Reedy, Justin Orr, Raymond Spicer, Paul Blanchard, Jessica W. Hiratsuka, Vanessa Y. Ketchum, Terry S. Saunkeah, Bobby Wark, Kyle Woodbury, R. Brian Humanit Soc Sci Commun Article Public deliberation has risen to the forefront of governance as a technique for increasing participation in policy making. Scholars and practitioners have also noted the potential for deliberation to give greater influence to historically marginalized populations, such as Indigenous peoples. However, there has been less attention paid to the potential fit between the ideals of deliberation and the governance and decision making practices of American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) peoples. In this paper, we begin to address this gap by analyzing accounts of AI/AN governance from the perspective of deliberation, and note areas of overlap, synergy, and conflict. We conduct a close reading of key historical and ethnographic accounts of four historical AI/AN contexts—the Iroquois Confederation under the Great Law of Peace, 19th century accounts of the Ojibwa village, the Santa Clara Pueblo government in pre-19th century, and Yup’ik village life in the early 20th century—and a more contemporary case in the form of the Santa Clara Pueblo’s Constitution from the Indian Reorganization Act period. We then apply two sets of key criteria for deliberative democracy—from the scholars Robert Dahl and John Gastil—to these accounts and note the ways in which each system is or is not congruent with these frameworks of deliberation. We find variations between these historical tribal contexts in our analysis. Social components of deliberation, such as respectful discussion and equal opportunities to participate, were partially or fully present in many accounts of governance practices, but it was less clear whether the analytic components, such as discussion of a range of solutions, were included in some forms of tribal governance. We then explore the potential implications of our findings for public deliberation within and in AI/AN tribes. We note that deliberative scholars and practitioners should be wary of over-generalizing about AI/AN tribes. 2020-06-24 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC8095723/ /pubmed/33954295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0506-4 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . http://www.nature.com/reprintsReprints and permission information is available at http://www.nature.com/reprints |
spellingShingle | Article Reedy, Justin Orr, Raymond Spicer, Paul Blanchard, Jessica W. Hiratsuka, Vanessa Y. Ketchum, Terry S. Saunkeah, Bobby Wark, Kyle Woodbury, R. Brian Deliberative democracy and historical perspectives on American Indian/Alaska native political decision-making practices |
title | Deliberative democracy and historical perspectives on American Indian/Alaska native political decision-making practices |
title_full | Deliberative democracy and historical perspectives on American Indian/Alaska native political decision-making practices |
title_fullStr | Deliberative democracy and historical perspectives on American Indian/Alaska native political decision-making practices |
title_full_unstemmed | Deliberative democracy and historical perspectives on American Indian/Alaska native political decision-making practices |
title_short | Deliberative democracy and historical perspectives on American Indian/Alaska native political decision-making practices |
title_sort | deliberative democracy and historical perspectives on american indian/alaska native political decision-making practices |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8095723/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33954295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0506-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reedyjustin deliberativedemocracyandhistoricalperspectivesonamericanindianalaskanativepoliticaldecisionmakingpractices AT orrraymond deliberativedemocracyandhistoricalperspectivesonamericanindianalaskanativepoliticaldecisionmakingpractices AT spicerpaul deliberativedemocracyandhistoricalperspectivesonamericanindianalaskanativepoliticaldecisionmakingpractices AT blanchardjessicaw deliberativedemocracyandhistoricalperspectivesonamericanindianalaskanativepoliticaldecisionmakingpractices AT hiratsukavanessay deliberativedemocracyandhistoricalperspectivesonamericanindianalaskanativepoliticaldecisionmakingpractices AT ketchumterrys deliberativedemocracyandhistoricalperspectivesonamericanindianalaskanativepoliticaldecisionmakingpractices AT saunkeahbobby deliberativedemocracyandhistoricalperspectivesonamericanindianalaskanativepoliticaldecisionmakingpractices AT warkkyle deliberativedemocracyandhistoricalperspectivesonamericanindianalaskanativepoliticaldecisionmakingpractices AT woodburyrbrian deliberativedemocracyandhistoricalperspectivesonamericanindianalaskanativepoliticaldecisionmakingpractices |