Cargando…

Regimen simplification and medication adherence: Fixed-dose versus loose-dose combination therapy for type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND: Suboptimal patient adherence to pharmacological therapy of type 2 diabetes may be due in part to pill burden. One way to reduce pill burden in patients who need multiple medications is to use fixed-dose combinations. Our study aimed to compare the effects of fixed-dose combination versus...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Böhm, Anna-Katharina, Schneider, Udo, Aberle, Jens, Stargardt, Tom
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8096115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33945556
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250993
_version_ 1783688099633561600
author Böhm, Anna-Katharina
Schneider, Udo
Aberle, Jens
Stargardt, Tom
author_facet Böhm, Anna-Katharina
Schneider, Udo
Aberle, Jens
Stargardt, Tom
author_sort Böhm, Anna-Katharina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Suboptimal patient adherence to pharmacological therapy of type 2 diabetes may be due in part to pill burden. One way to reduce pill burden in patients who need multiple medications is to use fixed-dose combinations. Our study aimed to compare the effects of fixed-dose combination versus loose-dose combination therapy on medication adherence and persistence, health care utilization, therapeutic safety, morbidities, and treatment modification in patients with type 2 diabetes over three years. METHODS: Using administrative data, we conducted a retrospective controlled cohort study comparing type 2 diabetes patients who switched from monotherapy to either a fixed-dose combination or a loose-dose combination. Adherence was assessed as the primary endpoint and calculated as the proportion of days covered with medication. After using entropy balancing to eliminate differences in observable baseline characteristics between the two groups, we applied difference-in-difference estimators for each outcome to account for time-invariant unobservable heterogeneity. RESULTS: Of the 990 type 2 diabetes patients included in our analysis, 756 were taking a fixed-dose combination and 234 were taking a loose-dose combination. We observed a statistically significantly higher change in adherence (year one: 0.22, p<0.001, year two: 0.25, p<0.001, and year three: 0.29, p<0.001) as well as higher persistence and a smaller change in the number of drug prescriptions in each of the three years in the fixed-dose combination group compared to the loose-dose combination group. The differences were most pronounced in patients who were poorly adherent, had a high pill burden, or did not have a severe concomitant disease. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that taking a fixed-dose combination can lead to a significant improvement in adherence to pharmacological therapy of type 2 diabetes compared to a loose-dose combination. In particular, these findings suggest that reducing pill burden may improve disease management among patients with more complex medication demand and patients who have demonstrated poor medication adherence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8096115
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80961152021-05-17 Regimen simplification and medication adherence: Fixed-dose versus loose-dose combination therapy for type 2 diabetes Böhm, Anna-Katharina Schneider, Udo Aberle, Jens Stargardt, Tom PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Suboptimal patient adherence to pharmacological therapy of type 2 diabetes may be due in part to pill burden. One way to reduce pill burden in patients who need multiple medications is to use fixed-dose combinations. Our study aimed to compare the effects of fixed-dose combination versus loose-dose combination therapy on medication adherence and persistence, health care utilization, therapeutic safety, morbidities, and treatment modification in patients with type 2 diabetes over three years. METHODS: Using administrative data, we conducted a retrospective controlled cohort study comparing type 2 diabetes patients who switched from monotherapy to either a fixed-dose combination or a loose-dose combination. Adherence was assessed as the primary endpoint and calculated as the proportion of days covered with medication. After using entropy balancing to eliminate differences in observable baseline characteristics between the two groups, we applied difference-in-difference estimators for each outcome to account for time-invariant unobservable heterogeneity. RESULTS: Of the 990 type 2 diabetes patients included in our analysis, 756 were taking a fixed-dose combination and 234 were taking a loose-dose combination. We observed a statistically significantly higher change in adherence (year one: 0.22, p<0.001, year two: 0.25, p<0.001, and year three: 0.29, p<0.001) as well as higher persistence and a smaller change in the number of drug prescriptions in each of the three years in the fixed-dose combination group compared to the loose-dose combination group. The differences were most pronounced in patients who were poorly adherent, had a high pill burden, or did not have a severe concomitant disease. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that taking a fixed-dose combination can lead to a significant improvement in adherence to pharmacological therapy of type 2 diabetes compared to a loose-dose combination. In particular, these findings suggest that reducing pill burden may improve disease management among patients with more complex medication demand and patients who have demonstrated poor medication adherence. Public Library of Science 2021-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8096115/ /pubmed/33945556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250993 Text en © 2021 Böhm et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Böhm, Anna-Katharina
Schneider, Udo
Aberle, Jens
Stargardt, Tom
Regimen simplification and medication adherence: Fixed-dose versus loose-dose combination therapy for type 2 diabetes
title Regimen simplification and medication adherence: Fixed-dose versus loose-dose combination therapy for type 2 diabetes
title_full Regimen simplification and medication adherence: Fixed-dose versus loose-dose combination therapy for type 2 diabetes
title_fullStr Regimen simplification and medication adherence: Fixed-dose versus loose-dose combination therapy for type 2 diabetes
title_full_unstemmed Regimen simplification and medication adherence: Fixed-dose versus loose-dose combination therapy for type 2 diabetes
title_short Regimen simplification and medication adherence: Fixed-dose versus loose-dose combination therapy for type 2 diabetes
title_sort regimen simplification and medication adherence: fixed-dose versus loose-dose combination therapy for type 2 diabetes
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8096115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33945556
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250993
work_keys_str_mv AT bohmannakatharina regimensimplificationandmedicationadherencefixeddoseversusloosedosecombinationtherapyfortype2diabetes
AT schneiderudo regimensimplificationandmedicationadherencefixeddoseversusloosedosecombinationtherapyfortype2diabetes
AT aberlejens regimensimplificationandmedicationadherencefixeddoseversusloosedosecombinationtherapyfortype2diabetes
AT stargardttom regimensimplificationandmedicationadherencefixeddoseversusloosedosecombinationtherapyfortype2diabetes