Cargando…
Yeast proteins do not practice social distancing as species hybridize
With the current COVID-19 pandemic, we all realized how important interactions are. Interactions are everywhere. At the cellular level, protein interactions play a key role and their ensemble, also called interactome, is often referred as the basic building blocks of life. Given its importance, the...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8096128/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33948708 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00294-021-01188-x |
_version_ | 1783688101356371968 |
---|---|
author | Berger, Caroline M. Landry, Christian R. |
author_facet | Berger, Caroline M. Landry, Christian R. |
author_sort | Berger, Caroline M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | With the current COVID-19 pandemic, we all realized how important interactions are. Interactions are everywhere. At the cellular level, protein interactions play a key role and their ensemble, also called interactome, is often referred as the basic building blocks of life. Given its importance, the maintenance of the integrity of the interactome is a real challenge in the cell. Many events during evolution can disrupt interactomes and potentially result in different characteristics for the organisms. However, the molecular underpinnings of changes in interactions at the cellular level are still largely unexplored. Among the perturbations, hybridization puts in contact two different interactomes, which may lead to many changes in the protein interaction network of the hybrid, including gains and losses of interactions. We recently investigated the fate of the interactomes after hybridization between yeast species using a comparative proteomics approach. A large-scale conservation of the interactions was observed in hybrids, but we also noticed the presence of proteostasis-related changes. This suggests that, despite a general robustness, small differences may accumulate in hybrids and perturb their protein physiology. Here, we summarize our work with a broader perspective on the importance of interactions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8096128 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80961282021-05-05 Yeast proteins do not practice social distancing as species hybridize Berger, Caroline M. Landry, Christian R. Curr Genet Mini-Review With the current COVID-19 pandemic, we all realized how important interactions are. Interactions are everywhere. At the cellular level, protein interactions play a key role and their ensemble, also called interactome, is often referred as the basic building blocks of life. Given its importance, the maintenance of the integrity of the interactome is a real challenge in the cell. Many events during evolution can disrupt interactomes and potentially result in different characteristics for the organisms. However, the molecular underpinnings of changes in interactions at the cellular level are still largely unexplored. Among the perturbations, hybridization puts in contact two different interactomes, which may lead to many changes in the protein interaction network of the hybrid, including gains and losses of interactions. We recently investigated the fate of the interactomes after hybridization between yeast species using a comparative proteomics approach. A large-scale conservation of the interactions was observed in hybrids, but we also noticed the presence of proteostasis-related changes. This suggests that, despite a general robustness, small differences may accumulate in hybrids and perturb their protein physiology. Here, we summarize our work with a broader perspective on the importance of interactions. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-05-04 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8096128/ /pubmed/33948708 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00294-021-01188-x Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Mini-Review Berger, Caroline M. Landry, Christian R. Yeast proteins do not practice social distancing as species hybridize |
title | Yeast proteins do not practice social distancing as species hybridize |
title_full | Yeast proteins do not practice social distancing as species hybridize |
title_fullStr | Yeast proteins do not practice social distancing as species hybridize |
title_full_unstemmed | Yeast proteins do not practice social distancing as species hybridize |
title_short | Yeast proteins do not practice social distancing as species hybridize |
title_sort | yeast proteins do not practice social distancing as species hybridize |
topic | Mini-Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8096128/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33948708 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00294-021-01188-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bergercarolinem yeastproteinsdonotpracticesocialdistancingasspecieshybridize AT landrychristianr yeastproteinsdonotpracticesocialdistancingasspecieshybridize |