Cargando…

Daptomycin Plus Fosfomycin Versus Daptomycin Alone for Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia and Endocarditis: A Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND: We aimed to determine whether daptomycin plus fosfomycin provides higher treatment success than daptomycin alone for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia and endocarditis. METHODS: A randomized (1:1) phase 3 superiority, open-label, and parallel group clinical tr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pujol, Miquel, Miró, José-María, Shaw, Evelyn, Aguado, Jose-María, San-Juan, Rafael, Puig-Asensio, Mireia, Pigrau, Carles, Calbo, Esther, Montejo, Miguel, Rodriguez-Álvarez, Regino, Garcia-Pais, María-Jose, Pintado, Vicente, Escudero-Sánchez, Rosa, Lopez-Contreras, Joaquín, Morata, Laura, Montero, Milagros, Andrés, Marta, Pasquau, Juan, Arenas, María-del-Mar, Padilla, Belén, Murillas, Javier, Jover-Sáenz, Alfredo, López-Cortes, Luis-Eduardo, García-Pardo, Graciano, Gasch, Oriol, Videla, Sebastian, Hereu, Pilar, Tebé, Cristian, Pallarès, Natalia, Sanllorente, Mireia, Domínguez, María-Ángeles, Càmara, Jordi, Ferrer, Anna, Padullés, Ariadna, Cuervo, Guillermo, Carratalà, Jordi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8096235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32725216
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa1081
_version_ 1783688121232130048
author Pujol, Miquel
Miró, José-María
Shaw, Evelyn
Aguado, Jose-María
San-Juan, Rafael
Puig-Asensio, Mireia
Pigrau, Carles
Calbo, Esther
Montejo, Miguel
Rodriguez-Álvarez, Regino
Garcia-Pais, María-Jose
Pintado, Vicente
Escudero-Sánchez, Rosa
Lopez-Contreras, Joaquín
Morata, Laura
Montero, Milagros
Andrés, Marta
Pasquau, Juan
Arenas, María-del-Mar
Padilla, Belén
Murillas, Javier
Jover-Sáenz, Alfredo
López-Cortes, Luis-Eduardo
García-Pardo, Graciano
Gasch, Oriol
Videla, Sebastian
Hereu, Pilar
Tebé, Cristian
Pallarès, Natalia
Sanllorente, Mireia
Domínguez, María-Ángeles
Càmara, Jordi
Ferrer, Anna
Padullés, Ariadna
Cuervo, Guillermo
Carratalà, Jordi
author_facet Pujol, Miquel
Miró, José-María
Shaw, Evelyn
Aguado, Jose-María
San-Juan, Rafael
Puig-Asensio, Mireia
Pigrau, Carles
Calbo, Esther
Montejo, Miguel
Rodriguez-Álvarez, Regino
Garcia-Pais, María-Jose
Pintado, Vicente
Escudero-Sánchez, Rosa
Lopez-Contreras, Joaquín
Morata, Laura
Montero, Milagros
Andrés, Marta
Pasquau, Juan
Arenas, María-del-Mar
Padilla, Belén
Murillas, Javier
Jover-Sáenz, Alfredo
López-Cortes, Luis-Eduardo
García-Pardo, Graciano
Gasch, Oriol
Videla, Sebastian
Hereu, Pilar
Tebé, Cristian
Pallarès, Natalia
Sanllorente, Mireia
Domínguez, María-Ángeles
Càmara, Jordi
Ferrer, Anna
Padullés, Ariadna
Cuervo, Guillermo
Carratalà, Jordi
author_sort Pujol, Miquel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We aimed to determine whether daptomycin plus fosfomycin provides higher treatment success than daptomycin alone for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia and endocarditis. METHODS: A randomized (1:1) phase 3 superiority, open-label, and parallel group clinical trial of adult inpatients with MRSA bacteremia was conducted at 18 Spanish hospitals. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either 10 mg/kg of daptomycin intravenously daily plus 2 g of fosfomycin intravenously every 6 hours, or 10 mg/kg of daptomycin intravenously daily. Primary endpoint was treatment success 6 weeks after the end of therapy. RESULTS: Of 167 patients randomized, 155 completed the trial and were assessed for the primary endpoint. Treatment success at 6 weeks after the end of therapy was achieved in 40 of 74 patients who received daptomycin plus fosfomycin and in 34 of 81 patients who were given daptomycin alone (54.1% vs 42.0%; relative risk, 1.29 [95% confidence interval, .93–1.8]; P = .135). At 6 weeks, daptomycin plus fosfomycin was associated with lower microbiologic failure (0 vs 9 patients; P = .003) and lower complicated bacteremia (16.2% vs 32.1%; P = .022). Adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation occurred in 13 of 74 patients (17.6%) receiving daptomycin plus fosfomycin, and in 4 of 81 patients (4.9%) receiving daptomycin alone (P = .018). CONCLUSIONS: Daptomycin plus fosfomycin provided 12% higher rate of treatment success than daptomycin alone, but this difference did not reach statistical significance. This antibiotic combination prevented microbiological failure and complicated bacteremia, but it was more often associated with adverse events. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT01898338.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8096235
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80962352021-05-10 Daptomycin Plus Fosfomycin Versus Daptomycin Alone for Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia and Endocarditis: A Randomized Clinical Trial Pujol, Miquel Miró, José-María Shaw, Evelyn Aguado, Jose-María San-Juan, Rafael Puig-Asensio, Mireia Pigrau, Carles Calbo, Esther Montejo, Miguel Rodriguez-Álvarez, Regino Garcia-Pais, María-Jose Pintado, Vicente Escudero-Sánchez, Rosa Lopez-Contreras, Joaquín Morata, Laura Montero, Milagros Andrés, Marta Pasquau, Juan Arenas, María-del-Mar Padilla, Belén Murillas, Javier Jover-Sáenz, Alfredo López-Cortes, Luis-Eduardo García-Pardo, Graciano Gasch, Oriol Videla, Sebastian Hereu, Pilar Tebé, Cristian Pallarès, Natalia Sanllorente, Mireia Domínguez, María-Ángeles Càmara, Jordi Ferrer, Anna Padullés, Ariadna Cuervo, Guillermo Carratalà, Jordi Clin Infect Dis Major Articles and Commentaries BACKGROUND: We aimed to determine whether daptomycin plus fosfomycin provides higher treatment success than daptomycin alone for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia and endocarditis. METHODS: A randomized (1:1) phase 3 superiority, open-label, and parallel group clinical trial of adult inpatients with MRSA bacteremia was conducted at 18 Spanish hospitals. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either 10 mg/kg of daptomycin intravenously daily plus 2 g of fosfomycin intravenously every 6 hours, or 10 mg/kg of daptomycin intravenously daily. Primary endpoint was treatment success 6 weeks after the end of therapy. RESULTS: Of 167 patients randomized, 155 completed the trial and were assessed for the primary endpoint. Treatment success at 6 weeks after the end of therapy was achieved in 40 of 74 patients who received daptomycin plus fosfomycin and in 34 of 81 patients who were given daptomycin alone (54.1% vs 42.0%; relative risk, 1.29 [95% confidence interval, .93–1.8]; P = .135). At 6 weeks, daptomycin plus fosfomycin was associated with lower microbiologic failure (0 vs 9 patients; P = .003) and lower complicated bacteremia (16.2% vs 32.1%; P = .022). Adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation occurred in 13 of 74 patients (17.6%) receiving daptomycin plus fosfomycin, and in 4 of 81 patients (4.9%) receiving daptomycin alone (P = .018). CONCLUSIONS: Daptomycin plus fosfomycin provided 12% higher rate of treatment success than daptomycin alone, but this difference did not reach statistical significance. This antibiotic combination prevented microbiological failure and complicated bacteremia, but it was more often associated with adverse events. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT01898338. Oxford University Press 2020-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8096235/ /pubmed/32725216 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa1081 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Major Articles and Commentaries
Pujol, Miquel
Miró, José-María
Shaw, Evelyn
Aguado, Jose-María
San-Juan, Rafael
Puig-Asensio, Mireia
Pigrau, Carles
Calbo, Esther
Montejo, Miguel
Rodriguez-Álvarez, Regino
Garcia-Pais, María-Jose
Pintado, Vicente
Escudero-Sánchez, Rosa
Lopez-Contreras, Joaquín
Morata, Laura
Montero, Milagros
Andrés, Marta
Pasquau, Juan
Arenas, María-del-Mar
Padilla, Belén
Murillas, Javier
Jover-Sáenz, Alfredo
López-Cortes, Luis-Eduardo
García-Pardo, Graciano
Gasch, Oriol
Videla, Sebastian
Hereu, Pilar
Tebé, Cristian
Pallarès, Natalia
Sanllorente, Mireia
Domínguez, María-Ángeles
Càmara, Jordi
Ferrer, Anna
Padullés, Ariadna
Cuervo, Guillermo
Carratalà, Jordi
Daptomycin Plus Fosfomycin Versus Daptomycin Alone for Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia and Endocarditis: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title Daptomycin Plus Fosfomycin Versus Daptomycin Alone for Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia and Endocarditis: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full Daptomycin Plus Fosfomycin Versus Daptomycin Alone for Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia and Endocarditis: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Daptomycin Plus Fosfomycin Versus Daptomycin Alone for Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia and Endocarditis: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Daptomycin Plus Fosfomycin Versus Daptomycin Alone for Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia and Endocarditis: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_short Daptomycin Plus Fosfomycin Versus Daptomycin Alone for Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia and Endocarditis: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_sort daptomycin plus fosfomycin versus daptomycin alone for methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and endocarditis: a randomized clinical trial
topic Major Articles and Commentaries
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8096235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32725216
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa1081
work_keys_str_mv AT pujolmiquel daptomycinplusfosfomycinversusdaptomycinaloneformethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaandendocarditisarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT mirojosemaria daptomycinplusfosfomycinversusdaptomycinaloneformethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaandendocarditisarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT shawevelyn daptomycinplusfosfomycinversusdaptomycinaloneformethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaandendocarditisarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT aguadojosemaria daptomycinplusfosfomycinversusdaptomycinaloneformethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaandendocarditisarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT sanjuanrafael daptomycinplusfosfomycinversusdaptomycinaloneformethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaandendocarditisarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT puigasensiomireia daptomycinplusfosfomycinversusdaptomycinaloneformethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaandendocarditisarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT pigraucarles daptomycinplusfosfomycinversusdaptomycinaloneformethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaandendocarditisarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT calboesther daptomycinplusfosfomycinversusdaptomycinaloneformethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaandendocarditisarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT montejomiguel daptomycinplusfosfomycinversusdaptomycinaloneformethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaandendocarditisarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT rodriguezalvarezregino daptomycinplusfosfomycinversusdaptomycinaloneformethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaandendocarditisarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT garciapaismariajose daptomycinplusfosfomycinversusdaptomycinaloneformethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaandendocarditisarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT pintadovicente daptomycinplusfosfomycinversusdaptomycinaloneformethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaandendocarditisarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT escuderosanchezrosa daptomycinplusfosfomycinversusdaptomycinaloneformethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaandendocarditisarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT lopezcontrerasjoaquin daptomycinplusfosfomycinversusdaptomycinaloneformethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaandendocarditisarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT moratalaura daptomycinplusfosfomycinversusdaptomycinaloneformethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaandendocarditisarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT monteromilagros daptomycinplusfosfomycinversusdaptomycinaloneformethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaandendocarditisarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT andresmarta daptomycinplusfosfomycinversusdaptomycinaloneformethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaandendocarditisarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT pasquaujuan daptomycinplusfosfomycinversusdaptomycinaloneformethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaandendocarditisarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT arenasmariadelmar daptomycinplusfosfomycinversusdaptomycinaloneformethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaandendocarditisarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT padillabelen daptomycinplusfosfomycinversusdaptomycinaloneformethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaandendocarditisarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT murillasjavier daptomycinplusfosfomycinversusdaptomycinaloneformethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaandendocarditisarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT joversaenzalfredo daptomycinplusfosfomycinversusdaptomycinaloneformethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaandendocarditisarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT lopezcortesluiseduardo daptomycinplusfosfomycinversusdaptomycinaloneformethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaandendocarditisarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT garciapardograciano daptomycinplusfosfomycinversusdaptomycinaloneformethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaandendocarditisarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT gaschoriol daptomycinplusfosfomycinversusdaptomycinaloneformethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaandendocarditisarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT videlasebastian daptomycinplusfosfomycinversusdaptomycinaloneformethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaandendocarditisarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT hereupilar daptomycinplusfosfomycinversusdaptomycinaloneformethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaandendocarditisarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT tebecristian daptomycinplusfosfomycinversusdaptomycinaloneformethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaandendocarditisarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT pallaresnatalia daptomycinplusfosfomycinversusdaptomycinaloneformethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaandendocarditisarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT sanllorentemireia daptomycinplusfosfomycinversusdaptomycinaloneformethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaandendocarditisarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT dominguezmariaangeles daptomycinplusfosfomycinversusdaptomycinaloneformethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaandendocarditisarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT camarajordi daptomycinplusfosfomycinversusdaptomycinaloneformethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaandendocarditisarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT ferreranna daptomycinplusfosfomycinversusdaptomycinaloneformethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaandendocarditisarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT padullesariadna daptomycinplusfosfomycinversusdaptomycinaloneformethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaandendocarditisarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT cuervoguillermo daptomycinplusfosfomycinversusdaptomycinaloneformethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaandendocarditisarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT carratalajordi daptomycinplusfosfomycinversusdaptomycinaloneformethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaandendocarditisarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT daptomycinplusfosfomycinversusdaptomycinaloneformethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaandendocarditisarandomizedclinicaltrial