Cargando…

Incorporating Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biomarkers in Active Surveillance Protocols - Results From the Prospective Stockholm3 Active Surveillance Trial (STHLM3AS)

BACKGROUND: Active surveillance (AS) for men with low-risk prostate cancer (PC) can lead to patient morbidity and healthcare overutilization. The aim of this study was to evaluate an AS protocol using the Stockholm3 test and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to reduce biopsy intensity. METHODS: We co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Olsson, Henrik, Nordström, Tobias, Jäderling, Fredrik, Egevad, Lars, Vigneswaran, Hari T, Annerstedt, Magnus, Grönberg, Henrik, Eklund, Martin, Lantz, Anna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8096373/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32866231
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djaa131
_version_ 1783688146108547072
author Olsson, Henrik
Nordström, Tobias
Jäderling, Fredrik
Egevad, Lars
Vigneswaran, Hari T
Annerstedt, Magnus
Grönberg, Henrik
Eklund, Martin
Lantz, Anna
author_facet Olsson, Henrik
Nordström, Tobias
Jäderling, Fredrik
Egevad, Lars
Vigneswaran, Hari T
Annerstedt, Magnus
Grönberg, Henrik
Eklund, Martin
Lantz, Anna
author_sort Olsson, Henrik
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Active surveillance (AS) for men with low-risk prostate cancer (PC) can lead to patient morbidity and healthcare overutilization. The aim of this study was to evaluate an AS protocol using the Stockholm3 test and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to reduce biopsy intensity. METHODS: We conducted a prospective multicenter study of 280 invited men from a contemporary screening study (STHLM3), with Gleason Score (GS) 3 + 3 PC on a current AS protocol. Patients underwent prostate-MRI and blood sampling for analysis of the Stockholm3 test including protein biomarkers, genetic variants, and clinical variables to predict risk of GS ≥3 + 4 PC followed by systematic biopsies and targeted biopsies (for Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 ≥3 lesions) in all men. Primary outcomes were reclassification to GS ≥3 + 4 PC and clinically significant PC (csPCa), including unfavorable intermediate risk PC or higher based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. RESULTS: Adding MRI-targeted biopsies to systematic biopsies increased sensitivity of GS ≥3 + 4 PC compared with systematic biopsies alone (relative sensitivity [RS] = 1.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.28 to 1.85). Performing biopsies in only MRI positive increased sensitivity of GS ≥3 + 4 PC (RS = 1.30, 95% CI = 1.04 to 1.67) and reduced number of biopsy procedures by 49.3% while missing 7.2% GS ≥3 + 4 PC and 1.4% csPCa. Excluding men with negative Stockholm3 test reduced the number of MRI investigations at follow-up by 22.5% and biopsies by 56.8% while missing 6.9% GS ≥3 + 4 PC and 1.3% csPCa. CONCLUSION: Including MRI and targeted/systematic biopsies in the follow-up for men on AS increased sensitivity of PC reclassification. Incorporation of risk prediction models including biomarkers may reduce the need for MRI use in men with low-risk PC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8096373
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80963732021-05-10 Incorporating Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biomarkers in Active Surveillance Protocols - Results From the Prospective Stockholm3 Active Surveillance Trial (STHLM3AS) Olsson, Henrik Nordström, Tobias Jäderling, Fredrik Egevad, Lars Vigneswaran, Hari T Annerstedt, Magnus Grönberg, Henrik Eklund, Martin Lantz, Anna J Natl Cancer Inst Articles BACKGROUND: Active surveillance (AS) for men with low-risk prostate cancer (PC) can lead to patient morbidity and healthcare overutilization. The aim of this study was to evaluate an AS protocol using the Stockholm3 test and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to reduce biopsy intensity. METHODS: We conducted a prospective multicenter study of 280 invited men from a contemporary screening study (STHLM3), with Gleason Score (GS) 3 + 3 PC on a current AS protocol. Patients underwent prostate-MRI and blood sampling for analysis of the Stockholm3 test including protein biomarkers, genetic variants, and clinical variables to predict risk of GS ≥3 + 4 PC followed by systematic biopsies and targeted biopsies (for Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 ≥3 lesions) in all men. Primary outcomes were reclassification to GS ≥3 + 4 PC and clinically significant PC (csPCa), including unfavorable intermediate risk PC or higher based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. RESULTS: Adding MRI-targeted biopsies to systematic biopsies increased sensitivity of GS ≥3 + 4 PC compared with systematic biopsies alone (relative sensitivity [RS] = 1.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.28 to 1.85). Performing biopsies in only MRI positive increased sensitivity of GS ≥3 + 4 PC (RS = 1.30, 95% CI = 1.04 to 1.67) and reduced number of biopsy procedures by 49.3% while missing 7.2% GS ≥3 + 4 PC and 1.4% csPCa. Excluding men with negative Stockholm3 test reduced the number of MRI investigations at follow-up by 22.5% and biopsies by 56.8% while missing 6.9% GS ≥3 + 4 PC and 1.3% csPCa. CONCLUSION: Including MRI and targeted/systematic biopsies in the follow-up for men on AS increased sensitivity of PC reclassification. Incorporation of risk prediction models including biomarkers may reduce the need for MRI use in men with low-risk PC. Oxford University Press 2020-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8096373/ /pubmed/32866231 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djaa131 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Articles
Olsson, Henrik
Nordström, Tobias
Jäderling, Fredrik
Egevad, Lars
Vigneswaran, Hari T
Annerstedt, Magnus
Grönberg, Henrik
Eklund, Martin
Lantz, Anna
Incorporating Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biomarkers in Active Surveillance Protocols - Results From the Prospective Stockholm3 Active Surveillance Trial (STHLM3AS)
title Incorporating Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biomarkers in Active Surveillance Protocols - Results From the Prospective Stockholm3 Active Surveillance Trial (STHLM3AS)
title_full Incorporating Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biomarkers in Active Surveillance Protocols - Results From the Prospective Stockholm3 Active Surveillance Trial (STHLM3AS)
title_fullStr Incorporating Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biomarkers in Active Surveillance Protocols - Results From the Prospective Stockholm3 Active Surveillance Trial (STHLM3AS)
title_full_unstemmed Incorporating Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biomarkers in Active Surveillance Protocols - Results From the Prospective Stockholm3 Active Surveillance Trial (STHLM3AS)
title_short Incorporating Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biomarkers in Active Surveillance Protocols - Results From the Prospective Stockholm3 Active Surveillance Trial (STHLM3AS)
title_sort incorporating magnetic resonance imaging and biomarkers in active surveillance protocols - results from the prospective stockholm3 active surveillance trial (sthlm3as)
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8096373/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32866231
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djaa131
work_keys_str_mv AT olssonhenrik incorporatingmagneticresonanceimagingandbiomarkersinactivesurveillanceprotocolsresultsfromtheprospectivestockholm3activesurveillancetrialsthlm3as
AT nordstromtobias incorporatingmagneticresonanceimagingandbiomarkersinactivesurveillanceprotocolsresultsfromtheprospectivestockholm3activesurveillancetrialsthlm3as
AT jaderlingfredrik incorporatingmagneticresonanceimagingandbiomarkersinactivesurveillanceprotocolsresultsfromtheprospectivestockholm3activesurveillancetrialsthlm3as
AT egevadlars incorporatingmagneticresonanceimagingandbiomarkersinactivesurveillanceprotocolsresultsfromtheprospectivestockholm3activesurveillancetrialsthlm3as
AT vigneswaranharit incorporatingmagneticresonanceimagingandbiomarkersinactivesurveillanceprotocolsresultsfromtheprospectivestockholm3activesurveillancetrialsthlm3as
AT annerstedtmagnus incorporatingmagneticresonanceimagingandbiomarkersinactivesurveillanceprotocolsresultsfromtheprospectivestockholm3activesurveillancetrialsthlm3as
AT gronberghenrik incorporatingmagneticresonanceimagingandbiomarkersinactivesurveillanceprotocolsresultsfromtheprospectivestockholm3activesurveillancetrialsthlm3as
AT eklundmartin incorporatingmagneticresonanceimagingandbiomarkersinactivesurveillanceprotocolsresultsfromtheprospectivestockholm3activesurveillancetrialsthlm3as
AT lantzanna incorporatingmagneticresonanceimagingandbiomarkersinactivesurveillanceprotocolsresultsfromtheprospectivestockholm3activesurveillancetrialsthlm3as