Cargando…

Field-based remote sensing models predict radiation use efficiency in wheat

Wheat yields are stagnating or declining in many regions, requiring efforts to improve the light conversion efficiency, known as radiation use efficiency (RUE). RUE is a key trait in plant physiology because it links light capture and primary metabolism with biomass accumulation and yield, but its m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Robles-Zazueta, Carlos A, Molero, Gemma, Pinto, Francisco, Foulkes, M John, Reynolds, Matthew P, Murchie, Erik H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8096595/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33713415
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erab115
_version_ 1783688193503133696
author Robles-Zazueta, Carlos A
Molero, Gemma
Pinto, Francisco
Foulkes, M John
Reynolds, Matthew P
Murchie, Erik H
author_facet Robles-Zazueta, Carlos A
Molero, Gemma
Pinto, Francisco
Foulkes, M John
Reynolds, Matthew P
Murchie, Erik H
author_sort Robles-Zazueta, Carlos A
collection PubMed
description Wheat yields are stagnating or declining in many regions, requiring efforts to improve the light conversion efficiency, known as radiation use efficiency (RUE). RUE is a key trait in plant physiology because it links light capture and primary metabolism with biomass accumulation and yield, but its measurement is time consuming and this has limited its use in fundamental research and large-scale physiological breeding. In this study, high-throughput plant phenotyping (HTPP) approaches were used among a population of field-grown wheat with variation in RUE and photosynthetic traits to build predictive models of RUE, biomass, and intercepted photosynthetically active radiation (IPAR). Three approaches were used: best combination of sensors; canopy vegetation indices; and partial least squares regression. The use of remote sensing models predicted RUE with up to 70% accuracy compared with ground truth data. Water indices and canopy greenness indices [normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), enhanced vegetation index (EVI)] are the better option to predict RUE, biomass, and IPAR, and indices related to gas exchange, non-photochemical quenching [photochemical reflectance index (PRI)] and senescence [structural-insensitive pigment index (SIPI)] are better predictors for these traits at the vegetative and grain-filling stages, respectively. These models will be instrumental to explain canopy processes, improve crop growth and yield modelling, and potentially be used to predict RUE in different crops or ecosystems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8096595
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80965952021-05-10 Field-based remote sensing models predict radiation use efficiency in wheat Robles-Zazueta, Carlos A Molero, Gemma Pinto, Francisco Foulkes, M John Reynolds, Matthew P Murchie, Erik H J Exp Bot Research Papers Wheat yields are stagnating or declining in many regions, requiring efforts to improve the light conversion efficiency, known as radiation use efficiency (RUE). RUE is a key trait in plant physiology because it links light capture and primary metabolism with biomass accumulation and yield, but its measurement is time consuming and this has limited its use in fundamental research and large-scale physiological breeding. In this study, high-throughput plant phenotyping (HTPP) approaches were used among a population of field-grown wheat with variation in RUE and photosynthetic traits to build predictive models of RUE, biomass, and intercepted photosynthetically active radiation (IPAR). Three approaches were used: best combination of sensors; canopy vegetation indices; and partial least squares regression. The use of remote sensing models predicted RUE with up to 70% accuracy compared with ground truth data. Water indices and canopy greenness indices [normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), enhanced vegetation index (EVI)] are the better option to predict RUE, biomass, and IPAR, and indices related to gas exchange, non-photochemical quenching [photochemical reflectance index (PRI)] and senescence [structural-insensitive pigment index (SIPI)] are better predictors for these traits at the vegetative and grain-filling stages, respectively. These models will be instrumental to explain canopy processes, improve crop growth and yield modelling, and potentially be used to predict RUE in different crops or ecosystems. Oxford University Press 2021-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8096595/ /pubmed/33713415 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erab115 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Papers
Robles-Zazueta, Carlos A
Molero, Gemma
Pinto, Francisco
Foulkes, M John
Reynolds, Matthew P
Murchie, Erik H
Field-based remote sensing models predict radiation use efficiency in wheat
title Field-based remote sensing models predict radiation use efficiency in wheat
title_full Field-based remote sensing models predict radiation use efficiency in wheat
title_fullStr Field-based remote sensing models predict radiation use efficiency in wheat
title_full_unstemmed Field-based remote sensing models predict radiation use efficiency in wheat
title_short Field-based remote sensing models predict radiation use efficiency in wheat
title_sort field-based remote sensing models predict radiation use efficiency in wheat
topic Research Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8096595/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33713415
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erab115
work_keys_str_mv AT robleszazuetacarlosa fieldbasedremotesensingmodelspredictradiationuseefficiencyinwheat
AT molerogemma fieldbasedremotesensingmodelspredictradiationuseefficiencyinwheat
AT pintofrancisco fieldbasedremotesensingmodelspredictradiationuseefficiencyinwheat
AT foulkesmjohn fieldbasedremotesensingmodelspredictradiationuseefficiencyinwheat
AT reynoldsmatthewp fieldbasedremotesensingmodelspredictradiationuseefficiencyinwheat
AT murchieerikh fieldbasedremotesensingmodelspredictradiationuseefficiencyinwheat