Cargando…
Impact of Type 2 Diabetes on Oncologic Outcomes of Hepatocellular Carcinomas in Non-Cirrhotic, Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis: a Matched-Pair Analysis
BACKGROUND: Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) associated hepatocellular carcinomas (NASH-HCC) are increasing. NASH-HCC often develops in the fibrotic liver. Several analyses report conflicting results regarding the outcome of non-cirrhotic NASH-HCC. Furthermore, type 2 diabetes (T2D) is considere...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8096744/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32378092 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11605-020-04628-0 |
_version_ | 1783688206751891456 |
---|---|
author | Billeter, Adrian T. Müller, Philip C. Albrecht, Thomas Roessler, Stephanie Löffler, Moritz Lemekhova, Anastasia Mehrabi, Arianeb Müller-Stich, Beat P. Hoffmann, Katrin |
author_facet | Billeter, Adrian T. Müller, Philip C. Albrecht, Thomas Roessler, Stephanie Löffler, Moritz Lemekhova, Anastasia Mehrabi, Arianeb Müller-Stich, Beat P. Hoffmann, Katrin |
author_sort | Billeter, Adrian T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) associated hepatocellular carcinomas (NASH-HCC) are increasing. NASH-HCC often develops in the fibrotic liver. Several analyses report conflicting results regarding the outcome of non-cirrhotic NASH-HCC. Furthermore, type 2 diabetes (T2D) is considered a risk factor for poor survival. The aim of this study was to investigate oncological outcomes of non-cirrhotic NASH-HCC and the impact of T2D. METHODS: Patients with non-cirrhotic NASH-HCC with T2D as determined by an expert pathologist conducting histological slide review were matched for risks factors for poor outcome (age, gender, body mass index) with patients with NASH-HCC without T2D. These patients were then matched 1:1 with HCCs of other underlying liver diseases with and without T2D. Oncological outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: Out of 365 HCCs resected between 2001 and 2017, 34 patients with non-cirrhotic NASH-HCC were selected (17 with T2D, 17 without T2D) and matched with 26 patients with hepatitis-HCC and 28 patients with alcohol-related HCC. Oncological risk factors such as tumor size, resection margin, and vessel invasion were comparable. There was no difference in overall survival (5-year survival 71.3% for NASH-HCC, 60.4% for hepatitis-HCC, 79.9% for alcohol-HCC). NASH-HCC was associated with longer disease-specific survival than hepatitis-HCC (5-year 87.5% vs. 63.7%, p = 0.048), while recurrence-free survival was identical. T2D had no impact on oncological outcomes in either liver disease. CONCLUSION: Non-cirrhotic NASH-HCC has outcomes comparable with other underling etiologies. Despite a lack of cirrhosis, patients with non-cirrhotic NASH-HCC have the same risks of HCC recurrence as patients with cirrhotic liver disease of other etiologies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8096744 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80967442021-05-05 Impact of Type 2 Diabetes on Oncologic Outcomes of Hepatocellular Carcinomas in Non-Cirrhotic, Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis: a Matched-Pair Analysis Billeter, Adrian T. Müller, Philip C. Albrecht, Thomas Roessler, Stephanie Löffler, Moritz Lemekhova, Anastasia Mehrabi, Arianeb Müller-Stich, Beat P. Hoffmann, Katrin J Gastrointest Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) associated hepatocellular carcinomas (NASH-HCC) are increasing. NASH-HCC often develops in the fibrotic liver. Several analyses report conflicting results regarding the outcome of non-cirrhotic NASH-HCC. Furthermore, type 2 diabetes (T2D) is considered a risk factor for poor survival. The aim of this study was to investigate oncological outcomes of non-cirrhotic NASH-HCC and the impact of T2D. METHODS: Patients with non-cirrhotic NASH-HCC with T2D as determined by an expert pathologist conducting histological slide review were matched for risks factors for poor outcome (age, gender, body mass index) with patients with NASH-HCC without T2D. These patients were then matched 1:1 with HCCs of other underlying liver diseases with and without T2D. Oncological outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: Out of 365 HCCs resected between 2001 and 2017, 34 patients with non-cirrhotic NASH-HCC were selected (17 with T2D, 17 without T2D) and matched with 26 patients with hepatitis-HCC and 28 patients with alcohol-related HCC. Oncological risk factors such as tumor size, resection margin, and vessel invasion were comparable. There was no difference in overall survival (5-year survival 71.3% for NASH-HCC, 60.4% for hepatitis-HCC, 79.9% for alcohol-HCC). NASH-HCC was associated with longer disease-specific survival than hepatitis-HCC (5-year 87.5% vs. 63.7%, p = 0.048), while recurrence-free survival was identical. T2D had no impact on oncological outcomes in either liver disease. CONCLUSION: Non-cirrhotic NASH-HCC has outcomes comparable with other underling etiologies. Despite a lack of cirrhosis, patients with non-cirrhotic NASH-HCC have the same risks of HCC recurrence as patients with cirrhotic liver disease of other etiologies. Springer US 2020-05-06 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8096744/ /pubmed/32378092 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11605-020-04628-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Billeter, Adrian T. Müller, Philip C. Albrecht, Thomas Roessler, Stephanie Löffler, Moritz Lemekhova, Anastasia Mehrabi, Arianeb Müller-Stich, Beat P. Hoffmann, Katrin Impact of Type 2 Diabetes on Oncologic Outcomes of Hepatocellular Carcinomas in Non-Cirrhotic, Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis: a Matched-Pair Analysis |
title | Impact of Type 2 Diabetes on Oncologic Outcomes of Hepatocellular Carcinomas in Non-Cirrhotic, Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis: a Matched-Pair Analysis |
title_full | Impact of Type 2 Diabetes on Oncologic Outcomes of Hepatocellular Carcinomas in Non-Cirrhotic, Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis: a Matched-Pair Analysis |
title_fullStr | Impact of Type 2 Diabetes on Oncologic Outcomes of Hepatocellular Carcinomas in Non-Cirrhotic, Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis: a Matched-Pair Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of Type 2 Diabetes on Oncologic Outcomes of Hepatocellular Carcinomas in Non-Cirrhotic, Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis: a Matched-Pair Analysis |
title_short | Impact of Type 2 Diabetes on Oncologic Outcomes of Hepatocellular Carcinomas in Non-Cirrhotic, Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis: a Matched-Pair Analysis |
title_sort | impact of type 2 diabetes on oncologic outcomes of hepatocellular carcinomas in non-cirrhotic, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: a matched-pair analysis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8096744/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32378092 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11605-020-04628-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT billeteradriant impactoftype2diabetesononcologicoutcomesofhepatocellularcarcinomasinnoncirrhoticnonalcoholicsteatohepatitisamatchedpairanalysis AT mullerphilipc impactoftype2diabetesononcologicoutcomesofhepatocellularcarcinomasinnoncirrhoticnonalcoholicsteatohepatitisamatchedpairanalysis AT albrechtthomas impactoftype2diabetesononcologicoutcomesofhepatocellularcarcinomasinnoncirrhoticnonalcoholicsteatohepatitisamatchedpairanalysis AT roesslerstephanie impactoftype2diabetesononcologicoutcomesofhepatocellularcarcinomasinnoncirrhoticnonalcoholicsteatohepatitisamatchedpairanalysis AT lofflermoritz impactoftype2diabetesononcologicoutcomesofhepatocellularcarcinomasinnoncirrhoticnonalcoholicsteatohepatitisamatchedpairanalysis AT lemekhovaanastasia impactoftype2diabetesononcologicoutcomesofhepatocellularcarcinomasinnoncirrhoticnonalcoholicsteatohepatitisamatchedpairanalysis AT mehrabiarianeb impactoftype2diabetesononcologicoutcomesofhepatocellularcarcinomasinnoncirrhoticnonalcoholicsteatohepatitisamatchedpairanalysis AT mullerstichbeatp impactoftype2diabetesononcologicoutcomesofhepatocellularcarcinomasinnoncirrhoticnonalcoholicsteatohepatitisamatchedpairanalysis AT hoffmannkatrin impactoftype2diabetesononcologicoutcomesofhepatocellularcarcinomasinnoncirrhoticnonalcoholicsteatohepatitisamatchedpairanalysis |