Cargando…
Assessing volume responsiveness using right ventricular dynamic indicators of preload
PURPOSE: Dynamic indicators of preload currently only do reflect preload requirements of the left ventricle. To date, no dynamic indicators of right ventricular preload have been established. The aim of this study was to calculate dynamic indicators of right ventricular preload and assess their abil...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Singapore
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8096889/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33950295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00540-021-02937-5 |
_version_ | 1783688235516428288 |
---|---|
author | Graessler, Michael F. Wodack, Karin H. Pinnschmidt, Hans O. Nishimoto, Sarah Behem, Christoph R. Reuter, Daniel A. Trepte, Constantin J. C. |
author_facet | Graessler, Michael F. Wodack, Karin H. Pinnschmidt, Hans O. Nishimoto, Sarah Behem, Christoph R. Reuter, Daniel A. Trepte, Constantin J. C. |
author_sort | Graessler, Michael F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Dynamic indicators of preload currently only do reflect preload requirements of the left ventricle. To date, no dynamic indicators of right ventricular preload have been established. The aim of this study was to calculate dynamic indicators of right ventricular preload and assess their ability to predict ventricular volume responsiveness. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was designed as experimental trial in 20 anaesthetized pigs. Micro-tip catheters and ultrasonic flow probes were used as experimental reference to enable measurement of right ventricular stroke volume and pulse pressure. Hypovolemia was induced (withdrawal of blood 20 ml/kg) and thereafter three volume-loading steps were performed. ROC analysis was performed to assess the ability of dynamic right ventricular parameters to predict volume response. RESULTS: ROC analysis revealed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.82 (CI 95% 0.73–0.89; p < 0.001) for right ventricular stroke volume variation (SVV(RV)), an AUC of 0.72 (CI 95% 0.53–0.85; p = 0.02) for pulmonary artery pulse pressure variation (PPV(PA)) and an AUC of 0.66 (CI 95% 0.51–0.79; p = 0.04) for pulmonary artery systolic pressure variation (SPV(PA)). CONCLUSIONS: In our experimental animal setting, calculating dynamic indicators of right ventricular preload is possible and appears promising in predicting volume responsiveness. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8096889 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Singapore |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80968892021-05-05 Assessing volume responsiveness using right ventricular dynamic indicators of preload Graessler, Michael F. Wodack, Karin H. Pinnschmidt, Hans O. Nishimoto, Sarah Behem, Christoph R. Reuter, Daniel A. Trepte, Constantin J. C. J Anesth Original Article PURPOSE: Dynamic indicators of preload currently only do reflect preload requirements of the left ventricle. To date, no dynamic indicators of right ventricular preload have been established. The aim of this study was to calculate dynamic indicators of right ventricular preload and assess their ability to predict ventricular volume responsiveness. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was designed as experimental trial in 20 anaesthetized pigs. Micro-tip catheters and ultrasonic flow probes were used as experimental reference to enable measurement of right ventricular stroke volume and pulse pressure. Hypovolemia was induced (withdrawal of blood 20 ml/kg) and thereafter three volume-loading steps were performed. ROC analysis was performed to assess the ability of dynamic right ventricular parameters to predict volume response. RESULTS: ROC analysis revealed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.82 (CI 95% 0.73–0.89; p < 0.001) for right ventricular stroke volume variation (SVV(RV)), an AUC of 0.72 (CI 95% 0.53–0.85; p = 0.02) for pulmonary artery pulse pressure variation (PPV(PA)) and an AUC of 0.66 (CI 95% 0.51–0.79; p = 0.04) for pulmonary artery systolic pressure variation (SPV(PA)). CONCLUSIONS: In our experimental animal setting, calculating dynamic indicators of right ventricular preload is possible and appears promising in predicting volume responsiveness. Springer Singapore 2021-05-05 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8096889/ /pubmed/33950295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00540-021-02937-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Graessler, Michael F. Wodack, Karin H. Pinnschmidt, Hans O. Nishimoto, Sarah Behem, Christoph R. Reuter, Daniel A. Trepte, Constantin J. C. Assessing volume responsiveness using right ventricular dynamic indicators of preload |
title | Assessing volume responsiveness using right ventricular dynamic indicators of preload |
title_full | Assessing volume responsiveness using right ventricular dynamic indicators of preload |
title_fullStr | Assessing volume responsiveness using right ventricular dynamic indicators of preload |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing volume responsiveness using right ventricular dynamic indicators of preload |
title_short | Assessing volume responsiveness using right ventricular dynamic indicators of preload |
title_sort | assessing volume responsiveness using right ventricular dynamic indicators of preload |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8096889/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33950295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00540-021-02937-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT graesslermichaelf assessingvolumeresponsivenessusingrightventriculardynamicindicatorsofpreload AT wodackkarinh assessingvolumeresponsivenessusingrightventriculardynamicindicatorsofpreload AT pinnschmidthanso assessingvolumeresponsivenessusingrightventriculardynamicindicatorsofpreload AT nishimotosarah assessingvolumeresponsivenessusingrightventriculardynamicindicatorsofpreload AT behemchristophr assessingvolumeresponsivenessusingrightventriculardynamicindicatorsofpreload AT reuterdaniela assessingvolumeresponsivenessusingrightventriculardynamicindicatorsofpreload AT trepteconstantinjc assessingvolumeresponsivenessusingrightventriculardynamicindicatorsofpreload |