Cargando…

Assessing volume responsiveness using right ventricular dynamic indicators of preload

PURPOSE: Dynamic indicators of preload currently only do reflect preload requirements of the left ventricle. To date, no dynamic indicators of right ventricular preload have been established. The aim of this study was to calculate dynamic indicators of right ventricular preload and assess their abil...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Graessler, Michael F., Wodack, Karin H., Pinnschmidt, Hans O., Nishimoto, Sarah, Behem, Christoph R., Reuter, Daniel A., Trepte, Constantin J. C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Singapore 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8096889/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33950295
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00540-021-02937-5
_version_ 1783688235516428288
author Graessler, Michael F.
Wodack, Karin H.
Pinnschmidt, Hans O.
Nishimoto, Sarah
Behem, Christoph R.
Reuter, Daniel A.
Trepte, Constantin J. C.
author_facet Graessler, Michael F.
Wodack, Karin H.
Pinnschmidt, Hans O.
Nishimoto, Sarah
Behem, Christoph R.
Reuter, Daniel A.
Trepte, Constantin J. C.
author_sort Graessler, Michael F.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Dynamic indicators of preload currently only do reflect preload requirements of the left ventricle. To date, no dynamic indicators of right ventricular preload have been established. The aim of this study was to calculate dynamic indicators of right ventricular preload and assess their ability to predict ventricular volume responsiveness. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was designed as experimental trial in 20 anaesthetized pigs. Micro-tip catheters and ultrasonic flow probes were used as experimental reference to enable measurement of right ventricular stroke volume and pulse pressure. Hypovolemia was induced (withdrawal of blood 20 ml/kg) and thereafter three volume-loading steps were performed. ROC analysis was performed to assess the ability of dynamic right ventricular parameters to predict volume response. RESULTS: ROC analysis revealed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.82 (CI 95% 0.73–0.89; p < 0.001) for right ventricular stroke volume variation (SVV(RV)), an AUC of 0.72 (CI 95% 0.53–0.85; p = 0.02) for pulmonary artery pulse pressure variation (PPV(PA)) and an AUC of 0.66 (CI 95% 0.51–0.79; p = 0.04) for pulmonary artery systolic pressure variation (SPV(PA)). CONCLUSIONS: In our experimental animal setting, calculating dynamic indicators of right ventricular preload is possible and appears promising in predicting volume responsiveness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8096889
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Singapore
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80968892021-05-05 Assessing volume responsiveness using right ventricular dynamic indicators of preload Graessler, Michael F. Wodack, Karin H. Pinnschmidt, Hans O. Nishimoto, Sarah Behem, Christoph R. Reuter, Daniel A. Trepte, Constantin J. C. J Anesth Original Article PURPOSE: Dynamic indicators of preload currently only do reflect preload requirements of the left ventricle. To date, no dynamic indicators of right ventricular preload have been established. The aim of this study was to calculate dynamic indicators of right ventricular preload and assess their ability to predict ventricular volume responsiveness. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was designed as experimental trial in 20 anaesthetized pigs. Micro-tip catheters and ultrasonic flow probes were used as experimental reference to enable measurement of right ventricular stroke volume and pulse pressure. Hypovolemia was induced (withdrawal of blood 20 ml/kg) and thereafter three volume-loading steps were performed. ROC analysis was performed to assess the ability of dynamic right ventricular parameters to predict volume response. RESULTS: ROC analysis revealed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.82 (CI 95% 0.73–0.89; p < 0.001) for right ventricular stroke volume variation (SVV(RV)), an AUC of 0.72 (CI 95% 0.53–0.85; p = 0.02) for pulmonary artery pulse pressure variation (PPV(PA)) and an AUC of 0.66 (CI 95% 0.51–0.79; p = 0.04) for pulmonary artery systolic pressure variation (SPV(PA)). CONCLUSIONS: In our experimental animal setting, calculating dynamic indicators of right ventricular preload is possible and appears promising in predicting volume responsiveness. Springer Singapore 2021-05-05 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8096889/ /pubmed/33950295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00540-021-02937-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Graessler, Michael F.
Wodack, Karin H.
Pinnschmidt, Hans O.
Nishimoto, Sarah
Behem, Christoph R.
Reuter, Daniel A.
Trepte, Constantin J. C.
Assessing volume responsiveness using right ventricular dynamic indicators of preload
title Assessing volume responsiveness using right ventricular dynamic indicators of preload
title_full Assessing volume responsiveness using right ventricular dynamic indicators of preload
title_fullStr Assessing volume responsiveness using right ventricular dynamic indicators of preload
title_full_unstemmed Assessing volume responsiveness using right ventricular dynamic indicators of preload
title_short Assessing volume responsiveness using right ventricular dynamic indicators of preload
title_sort assessing volume responsiveness using right ventricular dynamic indicators of preload
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8096889/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33950295
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00540-021-02937-5
work_keys_str_mv AT graesslermichaelf assessingvolumeresponsivenessusingrightventriculardynamicindicatorsofpreload
AT wodackkarinh assessingvolumeresponsivenessusingrightventriculardynamicindicatorsofpreload
AT pinnschmidthanso assessingvolumeresponsivenessusingrightventriculardynamicindicatorsofpreload
AT nishimotosarah assessingvolumeresponsivenessusingrightventriculardynamicindicatorsofpreload
AT behemchristophr assessingvolumeresponsivenessusingrightventriculardynamicindicatorsofpreload
AT reuterdaniela assessingvolumeresponsivenessusingrightventriculardynamicindicatorsofpreload
AT trepteconstantinjc assessingvolumeresponsivenessusingrightventriculardynamicindicatorsofpreload