Cargando…

Systematic review on effects of bioenergy from edible versus inedible feedstocks on food security

Achieving food security is a critical challenge of the Anthropocene that may conflict with environmental and societal goals such as increased energy access. The “fuel versus food” debate coupled with climate mitigation efforts has given rise to next-generation biofuels. Findings of this systematic r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahmed, Selena, Warne, Teresa, Smith, Erin, Goemann, Hannah, Linse, Greta, Greenwood, Mark, Kedziora, Jeremy, Sapp, Meghan, Kraner, Debra, Roemer, Kelli, Haggerty, Julia H., Jarchow, Meghann, Swanson, David, Poulter, Benjamin, Stoy, Paul C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8096942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33947871
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41538-021-00091-6
_version_ 1783688247544643584
author Ahmed, Selena
Warne, Teresa
Smith, Erin
Goemann, Hannah
Linse, Greta
Greenwood, Mark
Kedziora, Jeremy
Sapp, Meghan
Kraner, Debra
Roemer, Kelli
Haggerty, Julia H.
Jarchow, Meghann
Swanson, David
Poulter, Benjamin
Stoy, Paul C.
author_facet Ahmed, Selena
Warne, Teresa
Smith, Erin
Goemann, Hannah
Linse, Greta
Greenwood, Mark
Kedziora, Jeremy
Sapp, Meghan
Kraner, Debra
Roemer, Kelli
Haggerty, Julia H.
Jarchow, Meghann
Swanson, David
Poulter, Benjamin
Stoy, Paul C.
author_sort Ahmed, Selena
collection PubMed
description Achieving food security is a critical challenge of the Anthropocene that may conflict with environmental and societal goals such as increased energy access. The “fuel versus food” debate coupled with climate mitigation efforts has given rise to next-generation biofuels. Findings of this systematic review indicate just over half of the studies (56% of 224 publications) reported a negative impact of bioenergy production on food security. However, no relationship was found between bioenergy feedstocks that are edible versus inedible and food security (P value = 0.15). A strong relationship was found between bioenergy and type of food security parameter (P value < 0.001), sociodemographic index of study location (P value = 0.001), spatial scale (P value < 0.001), and temporal scale (P value = 0.017). Programs and policies focused on bioenergy and climate mitigation should monitor multiple food security parameters at various scales over the long term toward achieving diverse sustainability goals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8096942
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80969422021-05-05 Systematic review on effects of bioenergy from edible versus inedible feedstocks on food security Ahmed, Selena Warne, Teresa Smith, Erin Goemann, Hannah Linse, Greta Greenwood, Mark Kedziora, Jeremy Sapp, Meghan Kraner, Debra Roemer, Kelli Haggerty, Julia H. Jarchow, Meghann Swanson, David Poulter, Benjamin Stoy, Paul C. NPJ Sci Food Review Article Achieving food security is a critical challenge of the Anthropocene that may conflict with environmental and societal goals such as increased energy access. The “fuel versus food” debate coupled with climate mitigation efforts has given rise to next-generation biofuels. Findings of this systematic review indicate just over half of the studies (56% of 224 publications) reported a negative impact of bioenergy production on food security. However, no relationship was found between bioenergy feedstocks that are edible versus inedible and food security (P value = 0.15). A strong relationship was found between bioenergy and type of food security parameter (P value < 0.001), sociodemographic index of study location (P value = 0.001), spatial scale (P value < 0.001), and temporal scale (P value = 0.017). Programs and policies focused on bioenergy and climate mitigation should monitor multiple food security parameters at various scales over the long term toward achieving diverse sustainability goals. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8096942/ /pubmed/33947871 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41538-021-00091-6 Text en © This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article
Ahmed, Selena
Warne, Teresa
Smith, Erin
Goemann, Hannah
Linse, Greta
Greenwood, Mark
Kedziora, Jeremy
Sapp, Meghan
Kraner, Debra
Roemer, Kelli
Haggerty, Julia H.
Jarchow, Meghann
Swanson, David
Poulter, Benjamin
Stoy, Paul C.
Systematic review on effects of bioenergy from edible versus inedible feedstocks on food security
title Systematic review on effects of bioenergy from edible versus inedible feedstocks on food security
title_full Systematic review on effects of bioenergy from edible versus inedible feedstocks on food security
title_fullStr Systematic review on effects of bioenergy from edible versus inedible feedstocks on food security
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review on effects of bioenergy from edible versus inedible feedstocks on food security
title_short Systematic review on effects of bioenergy from edible versus inedible feedstocks on food security
title_sort systematic review on effects of bioenergy from edible versus inedible feedstocks on food security
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8096942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33947871
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41538-021-00091-6
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmedselena systematicreviewoneffectsofbioenergyfromedibleversusinediblefeedstocksonfoodsecurity
AT warneteresa systematicreviewoneffectsofbioenergyfromedibleversusinediblefeedstocksonfoodsecurity
AT smitherin systematicreviewoneffectsofbioenergyfromedibleversusinediblefeedstocksonfoodsecurity
AT goemannhannah systematicreviewoneffectsofbioenergyfromedibleversusinediblefeedstocksonfoodsecurity
AT linsegreta systematicreviewoneffectsofbioenergyfromedibleversusinediblefeedstocksonfoodsecurity
AT greenwoodmark systematicreviewoneffectsofbioenergyfromedibleversusinediblefeedstocksonfoodsecurity
AT kedziorajeremy systematicreviewoneffectsofbioenergyfromedibleversusinediblefeedstocksonfoodsecurity
AT sappmeghan systematicreviewoneffectsofbioenergyfromedibleversusinediblefeedstocksonfoodsecurity
AT kranerdebra systematicreviewoneffectsofbioenergyfromedibleversusinediblefeedstocksonfoodsecurity
AT roemerkelli systematicreviewoneffectsofbioenergyfromedibleversusinediblefeedstocksonfoodsecurity
AT haggertyjuliah systematicreviewoneffectsofbioenergyfromedibleversusinediblefeedstocksonfoodsecurity
AT jarchowmeghann systematicreviewoneffectsofbioenergyfromedibleversusinediblefeedstocksonfoodsecurity
AT swansondavid systematicreviewoneffectsofbioenergyfromedibleversusinediblefeedstocksonfoodsecurity
AT poulterbenjamin systematicreviewoneffectsofbioenergyfromedibleversusinediblefeedstocksonfoodsecurity
AT stoypaulc systematicreviewoneffectsofbioenergyfromedibleversusinediblefeedstocksonfoodsecurity