Cargando…
Systematic review on effects of bioenergy from edible versus inedible feedstocks on food security
Achieving food security is a critical challenge of the Anthropocene that may conflict with environmental and societal goals such as increased energy access. The “fuel versus food” debate coupled with climate mitigation efforts has given rise to next-generation biofuels. Findings of this systematic r...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8096942/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33947871 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41538-021-00091-6 |
_version_ | 1783688247544643584 |
---|---|
author | Ahmed, Selena Warne, Teresa Smith, Erin Goemann, Hannah Linse, Greta Greenwood, Mark Kedziora, Jeremy Sapp, Meghan Kraner, Debra Roemer, Kelli Haggerty, Julia H. Jarchow, Meghann Swanson, David Poulter, Benjamin Stoy, Paul C. |
author_facet | Ahmed, Selena Warne, Teresa Smith, Erin Goemann, Hannah Linse, Greta Greenwood, Mark Kedziora, Jeremy Sapp, Meghan Kraner, Debra Roemer, Kelli Haggerty, Julia H. Jarchow, Meghann Swanson, David Poulter, Benjamin Stoy, Paul C. |
author_sort | Ahmed, Selena |
collection | PubMed |
description | Achieving food security is a critical challenge of the Anthropocene that may conflict with environmental and societal goals such as increased energy access. The “fuel versus food” debate coupled with climate mitigation efforts has given rise to next-generation biofuels. Findings of this systematic review indicate just over half of the studies (56% of 224 publications) reported a negative impact of bioenergy production on food security. However, no relationship was found between bioenergy feedstocks that are edible versus inedible and food security (P value = 0.15). A strong relationship was found between bioenergy and type of food security parameter (P value < 0.001), sociodemographic index of study location (P value = 0.001), spatial scale (P value < 0.001), and temporal scale (P value = 0.017). Programs and policies focused on bioenergy and climate mitigation should monitor multiple food security parameters at various scales over the long term toward achieving diverse sustainability goals. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8096942 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80969422021-05-05 Systematic review on effects of bioenergy from edible versus inedible feedstocks on food security Ahmed, Selena Warne, Teresa Smith, Erin Goemann, Hannah Linse, Greta Greenwood, Mark Kedziora, Jeremy Sapp, Meghan Kraner, Debra Roemer, Kelli Haggerty, Julia H. Jarchow, Meghann Swanson, David Poulter, Benjamin Stoy, Paul C. NPJ Sci Food Review Article Achieving food security is a critical challenge of the Anthropocene that may conflict with environmental and societal goals such as increased energy access. The “fuel versus food” debate coupled with climate mitigation efforts has given rise to next-generation biofuels. Findings of this systematic review indicate just over half of the studies (56% of 224 publications) reported a negative impact of bioenergy production on food security. However, no relationship was found between bioenergy feedstocks that are edible versus inedible and food security (P value = 0.15). A strong relationship was found between bioenergy and type of food security parameter (P value < 0.001), sociodemographic index of study location (P value = 0.001), spatial scale (P value < 0.001), and temporal scale (P value = 0.017). Programs and policies focused on bioenergy and climate mitigation should monitor multiple food security parameters at various scales over the long term toward achieving diverse sustainability goals. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8096942/ /pubmed/33947871 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41538-021-00091-6 Text en © This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Article Ahmed, Selena Warne, Teresa Smith, Erin Goemann, Hannah Linse, Greta Greenwood, Mark Kedziora, Jeremy Sapp, Meghan Kraner, Debra Roemer, Kelli Haggerty, Julia H. Jarchow, Meghann Swanson, David Poulter, Benjamin Stoy, Paul C. Systematic review on effects of bioenergy from edible versus inedible feedstocks on food security |
title | Systematic review on effects of bioenergy from edible versus inedible feedstocks on food security |
title_full | Systematic review on effects of bioenergy from edible versus inedible feedstocks on food security |
title_fullStr | Systematic review on effects of bioenergy from edible versus inedible feedstocks on food security |
title_full_unstemmed | Systematic review on effects of bioenergy from edible versus inedible feedstocks on food security |
title_short | Systematic review on effects of bioenergy from edible versus inedible feedstocks on food security |
title_sort | systematic review on effects of bioenergy from edible versus inedible feedstocks on food security |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8096942/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33947871 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41538-021-00091-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ahmedselena systematicreviewoneffectsofbioenergyfromedibleversusinediblefeedstocksonfoodsecurity AT warneteresa systematicreviewoneffectsofbioenergyfromedibleversusinediblefeedstocksonfoodsecurity AT smitherin systematicreviewoneffectsofbioenergyfromedibleversusinediblefeedstocksonfoodsecurity AT goemannhannah systematicreviewoneffectsofbioenergyfromedibleversusinediblefeedstocksonfoodsecurity AT linsegreta systematicreviewoneffectsofbioenergyfromedibleversusinediblefeedstocksonfoodsecurity AT greenwoodmark systematicreviewoneffectsofbioenergyfromedibleversusinediblefeedstocksonfoodsecurity AT kedziorajeremy systematicreviewoneffectsofbioenergyfromedibleversusinediblefeedstocksonfoodsecurity AT sappmeghan systematicreviewoneffectsofbioenergyfromedibleversusinediblefeedstocksonfoodsecurity AT kranerdebra systematicreviewoneffectsofbioenergyfromedibleversusinediblefeedstocksonfoodsecurity AT roemerkelli systematicreviewoneffectsofbioenergyfromedibleversusinediblefeedstocksonfoodsecurity AT haggertyjuliah systematicreviewoneffectsofbioenergyfromedibleversusinediblefeedstocksonfoodsecurity AT jarchowmeghann systematicreviewoneffectsofbioenergyfromedibleversusinediblefeedstocksonfoodsecurity AT swansondavid systematicreviewoneffectsofbioenergyfromedibleversusinediblefeedstocksonfoodsecurity AT poulterbenjamin systematicreviewoneffectsofbioenergyfromedibleversusinediblefeedstocksonfoodsecurity AT stoypaulc systematicreviewoneffectsofbioenergyfromedibleversusinediblefeedstocksonfoodsecurity |