Cargando…
Improving Human Health in China Through Alternative Energy
In this study, we estimate the health benefits of more stringent alternative energy goals and the costs of reducing coal-fired power plant pollution in China projected in 2030. One of our two overarching alternative energy goals was to estimate the health benefits of complete elimination of coal ene...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8096989/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33968876 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.613517 |
_version_ | 1783688258768601088 |
---|---|
author | Scott, Melissa Sander, Robert Nemet, Gregory Patz, Jonathan |
author_facet | Scott, Melissa Sander, Robert Nemet, Gregory Patz, Jonathan |
author_sort | Scott, Melissa |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this study, we estimate the health benefits of more stringent alternative energy goals and the costs of reducing coal-fired power plant pollution in China projected in 2030. One of our two overarching alternative energy goals was to estimate the health benefits of complete elimination of coal energy, supplemented by natural gas and renewables. The second was a policy scenario similar to the U.S. 2013 Climate Action Plan (CAP), which played a pivotal role leading up to the 2015 Paris Climate Agreement. We used the Greenhouse Gas and Air Pollution Interactions and Synergies (GAINS) model created by the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis for our model simulations. We found that 17,137–24,220 premature deaths can be avoided if coal energy is completely replaced by alternative energy, and 8,693–9,281 premature deaths can be avoided if coal energy is replaced by alternatives in a CAP-like scenario. A CAP-like scenario using emission-controls in coal plants costs $11–18 per person. Reducing coal energy in China under a CAP-like scenario would free up $9.4 billion in the annual energy budget to spend on alternatives, whereas eliminating the cost of coal energy frees up $32 billion. This study's estimates show that more stringent alternative energy targets in China are worth the investment in terms of health. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8096989 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80969892021-05-06 Improving Human Health in China Through Alternative Energy Scott, Melissa Sander, Robert Nemet, Gregory Patz, Jonathan Front Public Health Public Health In this study, we estimate the health benefits of more stringent alternative energy goals and the costs of reducing coal-fired power plant pollution in China projected in 2030. One of our two overarching alternative energy goals was to estimate the health benefits of complete elimination of coal energy, supplemented by natural gas and renewables. The second was a policy scenario similar to the U.S. 2013 Climate Action Plan (CAP), which played a pivotal role leading up to the 2015 Paris Climate Agreement. We used the Greenhouse Gas and Air Pollution Interactions and Synergies (GAINS) model created by the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis for our model simulations. We found that 17,137–24,220 premature deaths can be avoided if coal energy is completely replaced by alternative energy, and 8,693–9,281 premature deaths can be avoided if coal energy is replaced by alternatives in a CAP-like scenario. A CAP-like scenario using emission-controls in coal plants costs $11–18 per person. Reducing coal energy in China under a CAP-like scenario would free up $9.4 billion in the annual energy budget to spend on alternatives, whereas eliminating the cost of coal energy frees up $32 billion. This study's estimates show that more stringent alternative energy targets in China are worth the investment in terms of health. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8096989/ /pubmed/33968876 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.613517 Text en Copyright © 2021 Scott, Sander, Nemet and Patz. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Public Health Scott, Melissa Sander, Robert Nemet, Gregory Patz, Jonathan Improving Human Health in China Through Alternative Energy |
title | Improving Human Health in China Through Alternative Energy |
title_full | Improving Human Health in China Through Alternative Energy |
title_fullStr | Improving Human Health in China Through Alternative Energy |
title_full_unstemmed | Improving Human Health in China Through Alternative Energy |
title_short | Improving Human Health in China Through Alternative Energy |
title_sort | improving human health in china through alternative energy |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8096989/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33968876 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.613517 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT scottmelissa improvinghumanhealthinchinathroughalternativeenergy AT sanderrobert improvinghumanhealthinchinathroughalternativeenergy AT nemetgregory improvinghumanhealthinchinathroughalternativeenergy AT patzjonathan improvinghumanhealthinchinathroughalternativeenergy |