Cargando…
What Atomic Positions Determines Reactivity of a Surface? Long‐Range, Directional Ligand Effects in Metallic Alloys
Ligand and strain effects can tune the adsorption energy of key reaction intermediates on a catalyst surface to speed up rate‐limiting steps of the reaction. As novel fields like high‐entropy alloys emerge, understanding these effects on the atomic structure level is paramount: What atoms near the b...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8097360/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33977047 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/advs.202003357 |
_version_ | 1783688338000052224 |
---|---|
author | Clausen, Christian M. Batchelor, Thomas A. A. Pedersen, Jack K. Rossmeisl, Jan |
author_facet | Clausen, Christian M. Batchelor, Thomas A. A. Pedersen, Jack K. Rossmeisl, Jan |
author_sort | Clausen, Christian M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Ligand and strain effects can tune the adsorption energy of key reaction intermediates on a catalyst surface to speed up rate‐limiting steps of the reaction. As novel fields like high‐entropy alloys emerge, understanding these effects on the atomic structure level is paramount: What atoms near the binding site determine the reactivity of the alloy surface? By statistical analysis of 2000 density functional theory calculations and subsequent host/guest calculations, it is shown that three atomic positions in the third layer of an fcc(111) metallic structure fourth‐nearest to the adsorption site display significantly increased influence on reactivity over any second or third nearest atomic positions. Subsequently observed in multiple facets and host metals, the effect cannot be explained simply through the d‐band model or a valence configuration model but rather by favorable directions of interaction determined by lattice geometry and the valence difference between host and guest elements. These results advance the general understanding of how the electronic interaction of different elements affect adsorbate–surface interactions and will contribute to design principles for rational catalyst discovery of better, more stable and energy efficient catalysts to be employed in energy conversion, fuel cell technologies, and industrial processes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8097360 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80973602021-05-10 What Atomic Positions Determines Reactivity of a Surface? Long‐Range, Directional Ligand Effects in Metallic Alloys Clausen, Christian M. Batchelor, Thomas A. A. Pedersen, Jack K. Rossmeisl, Jan Adv Sci (Weinh) Communications Ligand and strain effects can tune the adsorption energy of key reaction intermediates on a catalyst surface to speed up rate‐limiting steps of the reaction. As novel fields like high‐entropy alloys emerge, understanding these effects on the atomic structure level is paramount: What atoms near the binding site determine the reactivity of the alloy surface? By statistical analysis of 2000 density functional theory calculations and subsequent host/guest calculations, it is shown that three atomic positions in the third layer of an fcc(111) metallic structure fourth‐nearest to the adsorption site display significantly increased influence on reactivity over any second or third nearest atomic positions. Subsequently observed in multiple facets and host metals, the effect cannot be explained simply through the d‐band model or a valence configuration model but rather by favorable directions of interaction determined by lattice geometry and the valence difference between host and guest elements. These results advance the general understanding of how the electronic interaction of different elements affect adsorbate–surface interactions and will contribute to design principles for rational catalyst discovery of better, more stable and energy efficient catalysts to be employed in energy conversion, fuel cell technologies, and industrial processes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8097360/ /pubmed/33977047 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/advs.202003357 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Advanced Science published by Wiley‐VCH GmbH https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Communications Clausen, Christian M. Batchelor, Thomas A. A. Pedersen, Jack K. Rossmeisl, Jan What Atomic Positions Determines Reactivity of a Surface? Long‐Range, Directional Ligand Effects in Metallic Alloys |
title | What Atomic Positions Determines Reactivity of a Surface? Long‐Range, Directional Ligand Effects in Metallic Alloys |
title_full | What Atomic Positions Determines Reactivity of a Surface? Long‐Range, Directional Ligand Effects in Metallic Alloys |
title_fullStr | What Atomic Positions Determines Reactivity of a Surface? Long‐Range, Directional Ligand Effects in Metallic Alloys |
title_full_unstemmed | What Atomic Positions Determines Reactivity of a Surface? Long‐Range, Directional Ligand Effects in Metallic Alloys |
title_short | What Atomic Positions Determines Reactivity of a Surface? Long‐Range, Directional Ligand Effects in Metallic Alloys |
title_sort | what atomic positions determines reactivity of a surface? long‐range, directional ligand effects in metallic alloys |
topic | Communications |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8097360/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33977047 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/advs.202003357 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT clausenchristianm whatatomicpositionsdeterminesreactivityofasurfacelongrangedirectionalligandeffectsinmetallicalloys AT batchelorthomasaa whatatomicpositionsdeterminesreactivityofasurfacelongrangedirectionalligandeffectsinmetallicalloys AT pedersenjackk whatatomicpositionsdeterminesreactivityofasurfacelongrangedirectionalligandeffectsinmetallicalloys AT rossmeisljan whatatomicpositionsdeterminesreactivityofasurfacelongrangedirectionalligandeffectsinmetallicalloys |