Cargando…
The value of conventional radiographs for diagnosing internal fixation-associated infection
BACKGROUND: The aim of the study is to assess the diagnostic value of preoperative conventional radiographs for diagnosing infection associated with internal fixation devices. METHODS: We prospectively collected data of patients undergoing removal of internal fixation devices for any reason. Infect...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8097790/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33947369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04170-3 |
_version_ | 1783688384081821696 |
---|---|
author | Li, Cheng Renz, Nora Trampuz, Andrej Ojeda-Thies, Cristina |
author_facet | Li, Cheng Renz, Nora Trampuz, Andrej Ojeda-Thies, Cristina |
author_sort | Li, Cheng |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The aim of the study is to assess the diagnostic value of preoperative conventional radiographs for diagnosing infection associated with internal fixation devices. METHODS: We prospectively collected data of patients undergoing removal of internal fixation devices for any reason. Infection was diagnosed in case of purulence, sinus tract, positive histopathology and/or positive peri-implant tissue or sonication fluid culture. In radiographs radiolucent lines, implant breakage or displacement, or periosteal reaction were assessed. White blood cell count (WBC) and serum C-reactive protein (CRP) were determined at admission. RESULTS: We included 421 surgeries in 380 patients (median age 53.6 years, range 11–98 years), mainly indicated for infection (24.9%), nonunion (20.0%) and symptomatic implants (13.5%). Radiologic signs of infection included radiolucent lines (11.4%); implant breakage (12.4%) or displacement (10.7%); and periosteal reaction (7.1%). Infection was confirmed in 116 cases (27.6%). Only radiolucent lines (OR = 1.86 [95%CI: 1.00–3.38]) and periosteal reaction (OR = 2.48 [95%CI: 1.17–5.26]) were associated with infection, with a low sensitivity (16.4 and 12.1%, respectively), and high specificity (90.5 and 94.8%, respectively). Preoperative WBC and CRP had a sensitivity of 23.0 and 35.3%, and specificity of 91.7 and 89.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Radiological signs suggestive of infection were uncommon. Radiolucency and periosteal reaction were associated with infection, though with low sensitivity. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-021-04170-3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8097790 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80977902021-05-05 The value of conventional radiographs for diagnosing internal fixation-associated infection Li, Cheng Renz, Nora Trampuz, Andrej Ojeda-Thies, Cristina BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: The aim of the study is to assess the diagnostic value of preoperative conventional radiographs for diagnosing infection associated with internal fixation devices. METHODS: We prospectively collected data of patients undergoing removal of internal fixation devices for any reason. Infection was diagnosed in case of purulence, sinus tract, positive histopathology and/or positive peri-implant tissue or sonication fluid culture. In radiographs radiolucent lines, implant breakage or displacement, or periosteal reaction were assessed. White blood cell count (WBC) and serum C-reactive protein (CRP) were determined at admission. RESULTS: We included 421 surgeries in 380 patients (median age 53.6 years, range 11–98 years), mainly indicated for infection (24.9%), nonunion (20.0%) and symptomatic implants (13.5%). Radiologic signs of infection included radiolucent lines (11.4%); implant breakage (12.4%) or displacement (10.7%); and periosteal reaction (7.1%). Infection was confirmed in 116 cases (27.6%). Only radiolucent lines (OR = 1.86 [95%CI: 1.00–3.38]) and periosteal reaction (OR = 2.48 [95%CI: 1.17–5.26]) were associated with infection, with a low sensitivity (16.4 and 12.1%, respectively), and high specificity (90.5 and 94.8%, respectively). Preoperative WBC and CRP had a sensitivity of 23.0 and 35.3%, and specificity of 91.7 and 89.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Radiological signs suggestive of infection were uncommon. Radiolucency and periosteal reaction were associated with infection, though with low sensitivity. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-021-04170-3. BioMed Central 2021-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8097790/ /pubmed/33947369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04170-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Li, Cheng Renz, Nora Trampuz, Andrej Ojeda-Thies, Cristina The value of conventional radiographs for diagnosing internal fixation-associated infection |
title | The value of conventional radiographs for diagnosing internal fixation-associated infection |
title_full | The value of conventional radiographs for diagnosing internal fixation-associated infection |
title_fullStr | The value of conventional radiographs for diagnosing internal fixation-associated infection |
title_full_unstemmed | The value of conventional radiographs for diagnosing internal fixation-associated infection |
title_short | The value of conventional radiographs for diagnosing internal fixation-associated infection |
title_sort | value of conventional radiographs for diagnosing internal fixation-associated infection |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8097790/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33947369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04170-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT licheng thevalueofconventionalradiographsfordiagnosinginternalfixationassociatedinfection AT renznora thevalueofconventionalradiographsfordiagnosinginternalfixationassociatedinfection AT trampuzandrej thevalueofconventionalradiographsfordiagnosinginternalfixationassociatedinfection AT ojedathiescristina thevalueofconventionalradiographsfordiagnosinginternalfixationassociatedinfection AT licheng valueofconventionalradiographsfordiagnosinginternalfixationassociatedinfection AT renznora valueofconventionalradiographsfordiagnosinginternalfixationassociatedinfection AT trampuzandrej valueofconventionalradiographsfordiagnosinginternalfixationassociatedinfection AT ojedathiescristina valueofconventionalradiographsfordiagnosinginternalfixationassociatedinfection |