Cargando…

The value of conventional radiographs for diagnosing internal fixation-associated infection

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study is to  assess the diagnostic value of preoperative conventional radiographs for diagnosing infection associated with internal fixation devices. METHODS: We prospectively collected data of patients undergoing removal of internal fixation devices for any reason. Infect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Cheng, Renz, Nora, Trampuz, Andrej, Ojeda-Thies, Cristina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8097790/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33947369
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04170-3
_version_ 1783688384081821696
author Li, Cheng
Renz, Nora
Trampuz, Andrej
Ojeda-Thies, Cristina
author_facet Li, Cheng
Renz, Nora
Trampuz, Andrej
Ojeda-Thies, Cristina
author_sort Li, Cheng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of the study is to  assess the diagnostic value of preoperative conventional radiographs for diagnosing infection associated with internal fixation devices. METHODS: We prospectively collected data of patients undergoing removal of internal fixation devices for any reason. Infection was diagnosed in case of purulence, sinus tract, positive histopathology and/or positive peri-implant tissue or sonication fluid culture. In radiographs radiolucent lines, implant breakage or displacement, or periosteal reaction were assessed. White blood cell count (WBC) and serum C-reactive protein (CRP) were determined at admission. RESULTS: We included 421 surgeries in 380 patients (median age 53.6 years, range 11–98 years), mainly indicated for infection (24.9%), nonunion (20.0%) and symptomatic implants (13.5%). Radiologic signs of infection included radiolucent lines (11.4%); implant breakage (12.4%) or displacement (10.7%); and periosteal reaction (7.1%). Infection was confirmed in 116 cases (27.6%). Only radiolucent lines (OR = 1.86 [95%CI: 1.00–3.38]) and periosteal reaction (OR = 2.48 [95%CI: 1.17–5.26]) were associated with infection, with a low sensitivity (16.4 and 12.1%, respectively), and high specificity (90.5 and 94.8%, respectively). Preoperative WBC and CRP had a sensitivity of 23.0 and 35.3%, and specificity of 91.7 and 89.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Radiological signs suggestive of infection were uncommon. Radiolucency and periosteal reaction were associated with infection, though with low sensitivity. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-021-04170-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8097790
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80977902021-05-05 The value of conventional radiographs for diagnosing internal fixation-associated infection Li, Cheng Renz, Nora Trampuz, Andrej Ojeda-Thies, Cristina BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: The aim of the study is to  assess the diagnostic value of preoperative conventional radiographs for diagnosing infection associated with internal fixation devices. METHODS: We prospectively collected data of patients undergoing removal of internal fixation devices for any reason. Infection was diagnosed in case of purulence, sinus tract, positive histopathology and/or positive peri-implant tissue or sonication fluid culture. In radiographs radiolucent lines, implant breakage or displacement, or periosteal reaction were assessed. White blood cell count (WBC) and serum C-reactive protein (CRP) were determined at admission. RESULTS: We included 421 surgeries in 380 patients (median age 53.6 years, range 11–98 years), mainly indicated for infection (24.9%), nonunion (20.0%) and symptomatic implants (13.5%). Radiologic signs of infection included radiolucent lines (11.4%); implant breakage (12.4%) or displacement (10.7%); and periosteal reaction (7.1%). Infection was confirmed in 116 cases (27.6%). Only radiolucent lines (OR = 1.86 [95%CI: 1.00–3.38]) and periosteal reaction (OR = 2.48 [95%CI: 1.17–5.26]) were associated with infection, with a low sensitivity (16.4 and 12.1%, respectively), and high specificity (90.5 and 94.8%, respectively). Preoperative WBC and CRP had a sensitivity of 23.0 and 35.3%, and specificity of 91.7 and 89.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Radiological signs suggestive of infection were uncommon. Radiolucency and periosteal reaction were associated with infection, though with low sensitivity. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-021-04170-3. BioMed Central 2021-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8097790/ /pubmed/33947369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04170-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Li, Cheng
Renz, Nora
Trampuz, Andrej
Ojeda-Thies, Cristina
The value of conventional radiographs for diagnosing internal fixation-associated infection
title The value of conventional radiographs for diagnosing internal fixation-associated infection
title_full The value of conventional radiographs for diagnosing internal fixation-associated infection
title_fullStr The value of conventional radiographs for diagnosing internal fixation-associated infection
title_full_unstemmed The value of conventional radiographs for diagnosing internal fixation-associated infection
title_short The value of conventional radiographs for diagnosing internal fixation-associated infection
title_sort value of conventional radiographs for diagnosing internal fixation-associated infection
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8097790/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33947369
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04170-3
work_keys_str_mv AT licheng thevalueofconventionalradiographsfordiagnosinginternalfixationassociatedinfection
AT renznora thevalueofconventionalradiographsfordiagnosinginternalfixationassociatedinfection
AT trampuzandrej thevalueofconventionalradiographsfordiagnosinginternalfixationassociatedinfection
AT ojedathiescristina thevalueofconventionalradiographsfordiagnosinginternalfixationassociatedinfection
AT licheng valueofconventionalradiographsfordiagnosinginternalfixationassociatedinfection
AT renznora valueofconventionalradiographsfordiagnosinginternalfixationassociatedinfection
AT trampuzandrej valueofconventionalradiographsfordiagnosinginternalfixationassociatedinfection
AT ojedathiescristina valueofconventionalradiographsfordiagnosinginternalfixationassociatedinfection