Cargando…

The D*Phase-study: study protocol for a pragmatic two-phased, randomised controlled (non-inferiority) trial that addresses treatment non-response and compares cognitive behavioural therapy and short-term psychodynamic supportive psychotherapy for major depression

BACKGROUND: Several evidence-based psychotherapeutic treatment options are available for depression, but the treatment results could be improved. The D*Phase study directly compares short-term psychodynamic supportive psychotherapy (SPSP) and cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for Major Depressive...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miggiels, M. F., ten Klooster, P. M., Bremer-Hoeve, S., Dekker, J. J. M., Huibers, M. J. H., Reefhuis, E., Van, H. L., van Dijk, M. K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8097891/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33947374
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-021-03156-8
_version_ 1783688403696484352
author Miggiels, M. F.
ten Klooster, P. M.
Bremer-Hoeve, S.
Dekker, J. J. M.
Huibers, M. J. H.
Reefhuis, E.
Van, H. L.
van Dijk, M. K.
author_facet Miggiels, M. F.
ten Klooster, P. M.
Bremer-Hoeve, S.
Dekker, J. J. M.
Huibers, M. J. H.
Reefhuis, E.
Van, H. L.
van Dijk, M. K.
author_sort Miggiels, M. F.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Several evidence-based psychotherapeutic treatment options are available for depression, but the treatment results could be improved. The D*Phase study directly compares short-term psychodynamic supportive psychotherapy (SPSP) and cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). The objectives are 1. to investigate if, from a group level perspective, SPSP is not inferior to CBT in the treatment of major depressive disorder, 2. to build a model that may help predict the optimal type of treatment for a specific individual; and 3. to determine whether a change of therapist or a change of therapist and treatment method are effective strategies to deal with non-response. Furthermore (4.), the effect of the therapeutic alliance, treatment integrity and therapist allegiance on treatment outcome will be investigated. METHOD: In this pragmatic randomised controlled trial, 308 patients with a primary diagnosis of MDD are being recruited from a specialised mental health care institution in the Netherlands. In the first phase, patients are randomised 1:1 to either SPSP or CBT. In case of treatment non-response, a second phase follows in which non-responders from treatment phase one are randomised 1:1:1 to one of three groups: continuing the initial treatment with the same therapist, continuing the initial treatment with another therapist or continuing the other type of treatment with another therapist. In both treatment phases, patients are offered sixteen twice-weekly psychotherapy sessions. The primary outcome is an improvement in depressive symptoms. Process variables, working alliance and depressive symptoms, are frequently measured. Comprehensive assessments take place before the start of the first phase (at baseline), in week one, two and four during the treatment, and directly after the treatment (week eight). DISCUSSION: While the naturalistic setting of the study involves several challenges, we expect, by focusing on a large and diverse number of research variables, to generate important knowledge that may help enhance the effect of psychotherapeutic treatment for MDD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered on 26 August 2016 with the Netherlands Trial Register, part of the Dutch Cochrane Centre (NL5753), https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/5753
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8097891
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80978912021-05-05 The D*Phase-study: study protocol for a pragmatic two-phased, randomised controlled (non-inferiority) trial that addresses treatment non-response and compares cognitive behavioural therapy and short-term psychodynamic supportive psychotherapy for major depression Miggiels, M. F. ten Klooster, P. M. Bremer-Hoeve, S. Dekker, J. J. M. Huibers, M. J. H. Reefhuis, E. Van, H. L. van Dijk, M. K. BMC Psychiatry Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Several evidence-based psychotherapeutic treatment options are available for depression, but the treatment results could be improved. The D*Phase study directly compares short-term psychodynamic supportive psychotherapy (SPSP) and cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). The objectives are 1. to investigate if, from a group level perspective, SPSP is not inferior to CBT in the treatment of major depressive disorder, 2. to build a model that may help predict the optimal type of treatment for a specific individual; and 3. to determine whether a change of therapist or a change of therapist and treatment method are effective strategies to deal with non-response. Furthermore (4.), the effect of the therapeutic alliance, treatment integrity and therapist allegiance on treatment outcome will be investigated. METHOD: In this pragmatic randomised controlled trial, 308 patients with a primary diagnosis of MDD are being recruited from a specialised mental health care institution in the Netherlands. In the first phase, patients are randomised 1:1 to either SPSP or CBT. In case of treatment non-response, a second phase follows in which non-responders from treatment phase one are randomised 1:1:1 to one of three groups: continuing the initial treatment with the same therapist, continuing the initial treatment with another therapist or continuing the other type of treatment with another therapist. In both treatment phases, patients are offered sixteen twice-weekly psychotherapy sessions. The primary outcome is an improvement in depressive symptoms. Process variables, working alliance and depressive symptoms, are frequently measured. Comprehensive assessments take place before the start of the first phase (at baseline), in week one, two and four during the treatment, and directly after the treatment (week eight). DISCUSSION: While the naturalistic setting of the study involves several challenges, we expect, by focusing on a large and diverse number of research variables, to generate important knowledge that may help enhance the effect of psychotherapeutic treatment for MDD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered on 26 August 2016 with the Netherlands Trial Register, part of the Dutch Cochrane Centre (NL5753), https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/5753 BioMed Central 2021-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8097891/ /pubmed/33947374 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-021-03156-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Miggiels, M. F.
ten Klooster, P. M.
Bremer-Hoeve, S.
Dekker, J. J. M.
Huibers, M. J. H.
Reefhuis, E.
Van, H. L.
van Dijk, M. K.
The D*Phase-study: study protocol for a pragmatic two-phased, randomised controlled (non-inferiority) trial that addresses treatment non-response and compares cognitive behavioural therapy and short-term psychodynamic supportive psychotherapy for major depression
title The D*Phase-study: study protocol for a pragmatic two-phased, randomised controlled (non-inferiority) trial that addresses treatment non-response and compares cognitive behavioural therapy and short-term psychodynamic supportive psychotherapy for major depression
title_full The D*Phase-study: study protocol for a pragmatic two-phased, randomised controlled (non-inferiority) trial that addresses treatment non-response and compares cognitive behavioural therapy and short-term psychodynamic supportive psychotherapy for major depression
title_fullStr The D*Phase-study: study protocol for a pragmatic two-phased, randomised controlled (non-inferiority) trial that addresses treatment non-response and compares cognitive behavioural therapy and short-term psychodynamic supportive psychotherapy for major depression
title_full_unstemmed The D*Phase-study: study protocol for a pragmatic two-phased, randomised controlled (non-inferiority) trial that addresses treatment non-response and compares cognitive behavioural therapy and short-term psychodynamic supportive psychotherapy for major depression
title_short The D*Phase-study: study protocol for a pragmatic two-phased, randomised controlled (non-inferiority) trial that addresses treatment non-response and compares cognitive behavioural therapy and short-term psychodynamic supportive psychotherapy for major depression
title_sort d*phase-study: study protocol for a pragmatic two-phased, randomised controlled (non-inferiority) trial that addresses treatment non-response and compares cognitive behavioural therapy and short-term psychodynamic supportive psychotherapy for major depression
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8097891/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33947374
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-021-03156-8
work_keys_str_mv AT miggielsmf thedphasestudystudyprotocolforapragmatictwophasedrandomisedcontrollednoninferioritytrialthataddressestreatmentnonresponseandcomparescognitivebehaviouraltherapyandshorttermpsychodynamicsupportivepsychotherapyformajordepression
AT tenkloosterpm thedphasestudystudyprotocolforapragmatictwophasedrandomisedcontrollednoninferioritytrialthataddressestreatmentnonresponseandcomparescognitivebehaviouraltherapyandshorttermpsychodynamicsupportivepsychotherapyformajordepression
AT bremerhoeves thedphasestudystudyprotocolforapragmatictwophasedrandomisedcontrollednoninferioritytrialthataddressestreatmentnonresponseandcomparescognitivebehaviouraltherapyandshorttermpsychodynamicsupportivepsychotherapyformajordepression
AT dekkerjjm thedphasestudystudyprotocolforapragmatictwophasedrandomisedcontrollednoninferioritytrialthataddressestreatmentnonresponseandcomparescognitivebehaviouraltherapyandshorttermpsychodynamicsupportivepsychotherapyformajordepression
AT huibersmjh thedphasestudystudyprotocolforapragmatictwophasedrandomisedcontrollednoninferioritytrialthataddressestreatmentnonresponseandcomparescognitivebehaviouraltherapyandshorttermpsychodynamicsupportivepsychotherapyformajordepression
AT reefhuise thedphasestudystudyprotocolforapragmatictwophasedrandomisedcontrollednoninferioritytrialthataddressestreatmentnonresponseandcomparescognitivebehaviouraltherapyandshorttermpsychodynamicsupportivepsychotherapyformajordepression
AT vanhl thedphasestudystudyprotocolforapragmatictwophasedrandomisedcontrollednoninferioritytrialthataddressestreatmentnonresponseandcomparescognitivebehaviouraltherapyandshorttermpsychodynamicsupportivepsychotherapyformajordepression
AT vandijkmk thedphasestudystudyprotocolforapragmatictwophasedrandomisedcontrollednoninferioritytrialthataddressestreatmentnonresponseandcomparescognitivebehaviouraltherapyandshorttermpsychodynamicsupportivepsychotherapyformajordepression
AT miggielsmf dphasestudystudyprotocolforapragmatictwophasedrandomisedcontrollednoninferioritytrialthataddressestreatmentnonresponseandcomparescognitivebehaviouraltherapyandshorttermpsychodynamicsupportivepsychotherapyformajordepression
AT tenkloosterpm dphasestudystudyprotocolforapragmatictwophasedrandomisedcontrollednoninferioritytrialthataddressestreatmentnonresponseandcomparescognitivebehaviouraltherapyandshorttermpsychodynamicsupportivepsychotherapyformajordepression
AT bremerhoeves dphasestudystudyprotocolforapragmatictwophasedrandomisedcontrollednoninferioritytrialthataddressestreatmentnonresponseandcomparescognitivebehaviouraltherapyandshorttermpsychodynamicsupportivepsychotherapyformajordepression
AT dekkerjjm dphasestudystudyprotocolforapragmatictwophasedrandomisedcontrollednoninferioritytrialthataddressestreatmentnonresponseandcomparescognitivebehaviouraltherapyandshorttermpsychodynamicsupportivepsychotherapyformajordepression
AT huibersmjh dphasestudystudyprotocolforapragmatictwophasedrandomisedcontrollednoninferioritytrialthataddressestreatmentnonresponseandcomparescognitivebehaviouraltherapyandshorttermpsychodynamicsupportivepsychotherapyformajordepression
AT reefhuise dphasestudystudyprotocolforapragmatictwophasedrandomisedcontrollednoninferioritytrialthataddressestreatmentnonresponseandcomparescognitivebehaviouraltherapyandshorttermpsychodynamicsupportivepsychotherapyformajordepression
AT vanhl dphasestudystudyprotocolforapragmatictwophasedrandomisedcontrollednoninferioritytrialthataddressestreatmentnonresponseandcomparescognitivebehaviouraltherapyandshorttermpsychodynamicsupportivepsychotherapyformajordepression
AT vandijkmk dphasestudystudyprotocolforapragmatictwophasedrandomisedcontrollednoninferioritytrialthataddressestreatmentnonresponseandcomparescognitivebehaviouraltherapyandshorttermpsychodynamicsupportivepsychotherapyformajordepression