Cargando…
Cone‐beam computed tomography evaluation of C-shaped root and canal morphology of mandibular premolars
BACKGROUND: Mandibular premolars are complicated teeth to endodontically treat due to the anatomical variations that can present. The purpose of this study was to determine the presence of C-shaped configurations in mandibular premolars by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). METHODS: 380 mandibula...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8097939/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33947383 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01596-y |
_version_ | 1783688413066559488 |
---|---|
author | Brea, Gisbeli Gomez, Francisco Gomez-Sosa, Jose Francisco |
author_facet | Brea, Gisbeli Gomez, Francisco Gomez-Sosa, Jose Francisco |
author_sort | Brea, Gisbeli |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Mandibular premolars are complicated teeth to endodontically treat due to the anatomical variations that can present. The purpose of this study was to determine the presence of C-shaped configurations in mandibular premolars by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). METHODS: 380 mandibular first premolars and 308 mandibular second premolars cone-beam computed tomographic images were obtained from 292 patients (175 female and 117 male). Tooth position, number of roots, root canals, C-shaped root canal system configuration, level of canal bifurcation and radicular grooves were evaluated by two endodontists trained in CBCT evaluation; previously calibrated between them, and a radiologist with endodontic experience. Data were statistically compared by The Chi-square test (α = 0.05) to examine any significant difference between gender and C-shaped root canal system and any significant difference between C-shaped configuration according to Fan criteria and gender. RESULTS: Overall 100% (n = 688) teeth examined, 19.2% (n = 132) had a C-shaped root canals system. 9.16% (n = 63) in male patients and 10.03% (n = 69) in female patients. The prevalence of C-shaped root canal system in mandibular first premolar was 83.33 and 16.66% in mandibular second premolars. According to Fan classification, the mandibular first premolars showed 3.63% as C1, 9.09% C2, 59.09% C3, 21.81% C4a, 1.8% C4b. Mandibular second premolars showed 13.63% as C1, 18.18% C2, 13.63% C3, 27.27% C4a, 9.09% C4b. Male patients showed 4.54% as C1, 3.78% C2, 22.72% C3, 11.36% C4a, 0.75% C4b, and 4.54% out of classification. Female patients showed 0.75% as C1, 6.81% C2, 30.03% C3, 9.84 C4a, 2.27% C4b, and 2.27% out of classification. The 53.36% canal bifurcation in mandibular first premolars and 50.09% in mandibular second premolars were in the middle third. No statistical differences were found between C-shaped root canal system and gender or C-shaped configuration according to Fan criteria and gender. P was < 0.05. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitation of this study, the presence of C-shaped anatomical system is relatively low in mandibular second premolars than in mandibular first premolars. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8097939 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80979392021-05-05 Cone‐beam computed tomography evaluation of C-shaped root and canal morphology of mandibular premolars Brea, Gisbeli Gomez, Francisco Gomez-Sosa, Jose Francisco BMC Oral Health Research BACKGROUND: Mandibular premolars are complicated teeth to endodontically treat due to the anatomical variations that can present. The purpose of this study was to determine the presence of C-shaped configurations in mandibular premolars by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). METHODS: 380 mandibular first premolars and 308 mandibular second premolars cone-beam computed tomographic images were obtained from 292 patients (175 female and 117 male). Tooth position, number of roots, root canals, C-shaped root canal system configuration, level of canal bifurcation and radicular grooves were evaluated by two endodontists trained in CBCT evaluation; previously calibrated between them, and a radiologist with endodontic experience. Data were statistically compared by The Chi-square test (α = 0.05) to examine any significant difference between gender and C-shaped root canal system and any significant difference between C-shaped configuration according to Fan criteria and gender. RESULTS: Overall 100% (n = 688) teeth examined, 19.2% (n = 132) had a C-shaped root canals system. 9.16% (n = 63) in male patients and 10.03% (n = 69) in female patients. The prevalence of C-shaped root canal system in mandibular first premolar was 83.33 and 16.66% in mandibular second premolars. According to Fan classification, the mandibular first premolars showed 3.63% as C1, 9.09% C2, 59.09% C3, 21.81% C4a, 1.8% C4b. Mandibular second premolars showed 13.63% as C1, 18.18% C2, 13.63% C3, 27.27% C4a, 9.09% C4b. Male patients showed 4.54% as C1, 3.78% C2, 22.72% C3, 11.36% C4a, 0.75% C4b, and 4.54% out of classification. Female patients showed 0.75% as C1, 6.81% C2, 30.03% C3, 9.84 C4a, 2.27% C4b, and 2.27% out of classification. The 53.36% canal bifurcation in mandibular first premolars and 50.09% in mandibular second premolars were in the middle third. No statistical differences were found between C-shaped root canal system and gender or C-shaped configuration according to Fan criteria and gender. P was < 0.05. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitation of this study, the presence of C-shaped anatomical system is relatively low in mandibular second premolars than in mandibular first premolars. BioMed Central 2021-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8097939/ /pubmed/33947383 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01596-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Brea, Gisbeli Gomez, Francisco Gomez-Sosa, Jose Francisco Cone‐beam computed tomography evaluation of C-shaped root and canal morphology of mandibular premolars |
title | Cone‐beam computed tomography evaluation of C-shaped root and canal morphology of mandibular premolars |
title_full | Cone‐beam computed tomography evaluation of C-shaped root and canal morphology of mandibular premolars |
title_fullStr | Cone‐beam computed tomography evaluation of C-shaped root and canal morphology of mandibular premolars |
title_full_unstemmed | Cone‐beam computed tomography evaluation of C-shaped root and canal morphology of mandibular premolars |
title_short | Cone‐beam computed tomography evaluation of C-shaped root and canal morphology of mandibular premolars |
title_sort | cone‐beam computed tomography evaluation of c-shaped root and canal morphology of mandibular premolars |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8097939/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33947383 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01596-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT breagisbeli conebeamcomputedtomographyevaluationofcshapedrootandcanalmorphologyofmandibularpremolars AT gomezfrancisco conebeamcomputedtomographyevaluationofcshapedrootandcanalmorphologyofmandibularpremolars AT gomezsosajosefrancisco conebeamcomputedtomographyevaluationofcshapedrootandcanalmorphologyofmandibularpremolars |