Cargando…

Comparison of mandibular cross-sectional morphology between Class I and Class II subjects with different vertical patterns: based on CBCT images and statistical shape analysis

BACKGROUND: This study is aimed to (1) investigate the influence of sagittal and vertical patterns on mandibular cross-sectional morphology and to (2) provide visualized mandibular cross-sectional morphology in different groups with General Procrustes Analysis (GPA), canonical variance analysis (CVA...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Haotian, Liu, Zijin, Hu, Xinnong, Wu, Ben, Gu, Yan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8097981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33952217
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01591-3
_version_ 1783688420262936576
author Chen, Haotian
Liu, Zijin
Hu, Xinnong
Wu, Ben
Gu, Yan
author_facet Chen, Haotian
Liu, Zijin
Hu, Xinnong
Wu, Ben
Gu, Yan
author_sort Chen, Haotian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study is aimed to (1) investigate the influence of sagittal and vertical patterns on mandibular cross-sectional morphology and to (2) provide visualized mandibular cross-sectional morphology in different groups with General Procrustes Analysis (GPA), canonical variance analysis (CVA) and discriminant function analysis (DFA). METHODS: 324 cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images were collected to analyze mandibular cross-sectional morphology and were categorized into 12 groups according to sagittal and vertical pattern and gender. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the difference among the groups. Thirty equidistant points were marked along the contour of mandibular cross-section and GPA, CVA and DFA were applied. RESULTS: (1) Mandibular height in hyperdivergent groups was significantly higher than that in normodivergent and hypodivergent groups (P < 0.05). (2) Hypodivergent groups showed significantly wider upper third of mandibular width from symphysis to molar region than that in hyperdivergent group (P < 0.05), except for the premolar and molar regions in male groups (P > 0.05). (3) Class II hyperdivergent group showed narrowest lower third width in the molar region, with the mean value of 12.03 mm in females and 11.98 mm in males. (4) For males and females, the ratio between height and lower third width at symphysis was significantly higher in Class II hyperdivergent group than that in Class I hyperdivergent group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: (1) The influence of vertical facial patterns on mandibular cross-sectional morphology is more obvious than that of sagittal skeletal pattern. (2) Subjects with increased vertical dimension presented with a remarkable “slimer” mandibular cross-sectional morphology at symphysis. (3) A deeper curve along the anterior contour of symphysis in Class II hyperdivergent group was noted with GPA. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12903-021-01591-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8097981
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80979812021-05-06 Comparison of mandibular cross-sectional morphology between Class I and Class II subjects with different vertical patterns: based on CBCT images and statistical shape analysis Chen, Haotian Liu, Zijin Hu, Xinnong Wu, Ben Gu, Yan BMC Oral Health Research BACKGROUND: This study is aimed to (1) investigate the influence of sagittal and vertical patterns on mandibular cross-sectional morphology and to (2) provide visualized mandibular cross-sectional morphology in different groups with General Procrustes Analysis (GPA), canonical variance analysis (CVA) and discriminant function analysis (DFA). METHODS: 324 cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images were collected to analyze mandibular cross-sectional morphology and were categorized into 12 groups according to sagittal and vertical pattern and gender. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the difference among the groups. Thirty equidistant points were marked along the contour of mandibular cross-section and GPA, CVA and DFA were applied. RESULTS: (1) Mandibular height in hyperdivergent groups was significantly higher than that in normodivergent and hypodivergent groups (P < 0.05). (2) Hypodivergent groups showed significantly wider upper third of mandibular width from symphysis to molar region than that in hyperdivergent group (P < 0.05), except for the premolar and molar regions in male groups (P > 0.05). (3) Class II hyperdivergent group showed narrowest lower third width in the molar region, with the mean value of 12.03 mm in females and 11.98 mm in males. (4) For males and females, the ratio between height and lower third width at symphysis was significantly higher in Class II hyperdivergent group than that in Class I hyperdivergent group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: (1) The influence of vertical facial patterns on mandibular cross-sectional morphology is more obvious than that of sagittal skeletal pattern. (2) Subjects with increased vertical dimension presented with a remarkable “slimer” mandibular cross-sectional morphology at symphysis. (3) A deeper curve along the anterior contour of symphysis in Class II hyperdivergent group was noted with GPA. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12903-021-01591-3. BioMed Central 2021-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8097981/ /pubmed/33952217 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01591-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Chen, Haotian
Liu, Zijin
Hu, Xinnong
Wu, Ben
Gu, Yan
Comparison of mandibular cross-sectional morphology between Class I and Class II subjects with different vertical patterns: based on CBCT images and statistical shape analysis
title Comparison of mandibular cross-sectional morphology between Class I and Class II subjects with different vertical patterns: based on CBCT images and statistical shape analysis
title_full Comparison of mandibular cross-sectional morphology between Class I and Class II subjects with different vertical patterns: based on CBCT images and statistical shape analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of mandibular cross-sectional morphology between Class I and Class II subjects with different vertical patterns: based on CBCT images and statistical shape analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of mandibular cross-sectional morphology between Class I and Class II subjects with different vertical patterns: based on CBCT images and statistical shape analysis
title_short Comparison of mandibular cross-sectional morphology between Class I and Class II subjects with different vertical patterns: based on CBCT images and statistical shape analysis
title_sort comparison of mandibular cross-sectional morphology between class i and class ii subjects with different vertical patterns: based on cbct images and statistical shape analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8097981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33952217
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01591-3
work_keys_str_mv AT chenhaotian comparisonofmandibularcrosssectionalmorphologybetweenclassiandclassiisubjectswithdifferentverticalpatternsbasedoncbctimagesandstatisticalshapeanalysis
AT liuzijin comparisonofmandibularcrosssectionalmorphologybetweenclassiandclassiisubjectswithdifferentverticalpatternsbasedoncbctimagesandstatisticalshapeanalysis
AT huxinnong comparisonofmandibularcrosssectionalmorphologybetweenclassiandclassiisubjectswithdifferentverticalpatternsbasedoncbctimagesandstatisticalshapeanalysis
AT wuben comparisonofmandibularcrosssectionalmorphologybetweenclassiandclassiisubjectswithdifferentverticalpatternsbasedoncbctimagesandstatisticalshapeanalysis
AT guyan comparisonofmandibularcrosssectionalmorphologybetweenclassiandclassiisubjectswithdifferentverticalpatternsbasedoncbctimagesandstatisticalshapeanalysis