Cargando…

Co-development, co-production and co-dissemination of scientific research: a case study to demonstrate mutual benefits

Inadequate and inequitable distribution of research capacity and resources limits both the opportunity for leadership and participation in science. It also results in biases of effort, poor and misinterpretation of global patterns and the availability of limited usable knowledge for current challeng...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Woodall, Lucy C., Talma, Sheena, Steeds, Oliver, Stefanoudis, Paris, Jeremie-Muzungaile, Marie-May, de Comarmond, Alain
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8098115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33849351
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2020.0699
_version_ 1783688439935270912
author Woodall, Lucy C.
Talma, Sheena
Steeds, Oliver
Stefanoudis, Paris
Jeremie-Muzungaile, Marie-May
de Comarmond, Alain
author_facet Woodall, Lucy C.
Talma, Sheena
Steeds, Oliver
Stefanoudis, Paris
Jeremie-Muzungaile, Marie-May
de Comarmond, Alain
author_sort Woodall, Lucy C.
collection PubMed
description Inadequate and inequitable distribution of research capacity and resources limits both the opportunity for leadership and participation in science. It also results in biases of effort, poor and misinterpretation of global patterns and the availability of limited usable knowledge for current challenges. Increased participation in ocean research and decision-making is needed to account for many stressors and challenges. The current intergovernmental attention on the ocean (e.g. UN Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development) and the development of technologies that permit exploration and accelerate exploitation suggest that it is timely to focus on the ocean and its stewardship. Employing the principles of co-development, co-production and co-dissemination, this paper uses a case study of a deep reef project in Seychelles to illustrate some activities that can be employed to magnify research outcomes and legacy. We provide examples that range from ministerial briefings and planning meetings to joint fieldwork, grant allocation and co-authoring outputs. These activities helped us to align priorities, promote authentic interactions and focus on equitable science. Finally, reflecting on our experiences, we acknowledge the benefits brought by respectful and long-term partnerships, the variety of activities needed to develop these and challenges of maintaining them. In the future, we also want to include more opportunities for regional peer-to-peer learning and technology transfer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8098115
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80981152021-05-11 Co-development, co-production and co-dissemination of scientific research: a case study to demonstrate mutual benefits Woodall, Lucy C. Talma, Sheena Steeds, Oliver Stefanoudis, Paris Jeremie-Muzungaile, Marie-May de Comarmond, Alain Biol Lett Marine Biology Inadequate and inequitable distribution of research capacity and resources limits both the opportunity for leadership and participation in science. It also results in biases of effort, poor and misinterpretation of global patterns and the availability of limited usable knowledge for current challenges. Increased participation in ocean research and decision-making is needed to account for many stressors and challenges. The current intergovernmental attention on the ocean (e.g. UN Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development) and the development of technologies that permit exploration and accelerate exploitation suggest that it is timely to focus on the ocean and its stewardship. Employing the principles of co-development, co-production and co-dissemination, this paper uses a case study of a deep reef project in Seychelles to illustrate some activities that can be employed to magnify research outcomes and legacy. We provide examples that range from ministerial briefings and planning meetings to joint fieldwork, grant allocation and co-authoring outputs. These activities helped us to align priorities, promote authentic interactions and focus on equitable science. Finally, reflecting on our experiences, we acknowledge the benefits brought by respectful and long-term partnerships, the variety of activities needed to develop these and challenges of maintaining them. In the future, we also want to include more opportunities for regional peer-to-peer learning and technology transfer. The Royal Society 2021-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8098115/ /pubmed/33849351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2020.0699 Text en © 2021 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Marine Biology
Woodall, Lucy C.
Talma, Sheena
Steeds, Oliver
Stefanoudis, Paris
Jeremie-Muzungaile, Marie-May
de Comarmond, Alain
Co-development, co-production and co-dissemination of scientific research: a case study to demonstrate mutual benefits
title Co-development, co-production and co-dissemination of scientific research: a case study to demonstrate mutual benefits
title_full Co-development, co-production and co-dissemination of scientific research: a case study to demonstrate mutual benefits
title_fullStr Co-development, co-production and co-dissemination of scientific research: a case study to demonstrate mutual benefits
title_full_unstemmed Co-development, co-production and co-dissemination of scientific research: a case study to demonstrate mutual benefits
title_short Co-development, co-production and co-dissemination of scientific research: a case study to demonstrate mutual benefits
title_sort co-development, co-production and co-dissemination of scientific research: a case study to demonstrate mutual benefits
topic Marine Biology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8098115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33849351
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2020.0699
work_keys_str_mv AT woodalllucyc codevelopmentcoproductionandcodisseminationofscientificresearchacasestudytodemonstratemutualbenefits
AT talmasheena codevelopmentcoproductionandcodisseminationofscientificresearchacasestudytodemonstratemutualbenefits
AT steedsoliver codevelopmentcoproductionandcodisseminationofscientificresearchacasestudytodemonstratemutualbenefits
AT stefanoudisparis codevelopmentcoproductionandcodisseminationofscientificresearchacasestudytodemonstratemutualbenefits
AT jeremiemuzungailemariemay codevelopmentcoproductionandcodisseminationofscientificresearchacasestudytodemonstratemutualbenefits
AT decomarmondalain codevelopmentcoproductionandcodisseminationofscientificresearchacasestudytodemonstratemutualbenefits