Cargando…
Co-development, co-production and co-dissemination of scientific research: a case study to demonstrate mutual benefits
Inadequate and inequitable distribution of research capacity and resources limits both the opportunity for leadership and participation in science. It also results in biases of effort, poor and misinterpretation of global patterns and the availability of limited usable knowledge for current challeng...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8098115/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33849351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2020.0699 |
_version_ | 1783688439935270912 |
---|---|
author | Woodall, Lucy C. Talma, Sheena Steeds, Oliver Stefanoudis, Paris Jeremie-Muzungaile, Marie-May de Comarmond, Alain |
author_facet | Woodall, Lucy C. Talma, Sheena Steeds, Oliver Stefanoudis, Paris Jeremie-Muzungaile, Marie-May de Comarmond, Alain |
author_sort | Woodall, Lucy C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Inadequate and inequitable distribution of research capacity and resources limits both the opportunity for leadership and participation in science. It also results in biases of effort, poor and misinterpretation of global patterns and the availability of limited usable knowledge for current challenges. Increased participation in ocean research and decision-making is needed to account for many stressors and challenges. The current intergovernmental attention on the ocean (e.g. UN Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development) and the development of technologies that permit exploration and accelerate exploitation suggest that it is timely to focus on the ocean and its stewardship. Employing the principles of co-development, co-production and co-dissemination, this paper uses a case study of a deep reef project in Seychelles to illustrate some activities that can be employed to magnify research outcomes and legacy. We provide examples that range from ministerial briefings and planning meetings to joint fieldwork, grant allocation and co-authoring outputs. These activities helped us to align priorities, promote authentic interactions and focus on equitable science. Finally, reflecting on our experiences, we acknowledge the benefits brought by respectful and long-term partnerships, the variety of activities needed to develop these and challenges of maintaining them. In the future, we also want to include more opportunities for regional peer-to-peer learning and technology transfer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8098115 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | The Royal Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80981152021-05-11 Co-development, co-production and co-dissemination of scientific research: a case study to demonstrate mutual benefits Woodall, Lucy C. Talma, Sheena Steeds, Oliver Stefanoudis, Paris Jeremie-Muzungaile, Marie-May de Comarmond, Alain Biol Lett Marine Biology Inadequate and inequitable distribution of research capacity and resources limits both the opportunity for leadership and participation in science. It also results in biases of effort, poor and misinterpretation of global patterns and the availability of limited usable knowledge for current challenges. Increased participation in ocean research and decision-making is needed to account for many stressors and challenges. The current intergovernmental attention on the ocean (e.g. UN Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development) and the development of technologies that permit exploration and accelerate exploitation suggest that it is timely to focus on the ocean and its stewardship. Employing the principles of co-development, co-production and co-dissemination, this paper uses a case study of a deep reef project in Seychelles to illustrate some activities that can be employed to magnify research outcomes and legacy. We provide examples that range from ministerial briefings and planning meetings to joint fieldwork, grant allocation and co-authoring outputs. These activities helped us to align priorities, promote authentic interactions and focus on equitable science. Finally, reflecting on our experiences, we acknowledge the benefits brought by respectful and long-term partnerships, the variety of activities needed to develop these and challenges of maintaining them. In the future, we also want to include more opportunities for regional peer-to-peer learning and technology transfer. The Royal Society 2021-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8098115/ /pubmed/33849351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2020.0699 Text en © 2021 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Marine Biology Woodall, Lucy C. Talma, Sheena Steeds, Oliver Stefanoudis, Paris Jeremie-Muzungaile, Marie-May de Comarmond, Alain Co-development, co-production and co-dissemination of scientific research: a case study to demonstrate mutual benefits |
title | Co-development, co-production and co-dissemination of scientific research: a case study to demonstrate mutual benefits |
title_full | Co-development, co-production and co-dissemination of scientific research: a case study to demonstrate mutual benefits |
title_fullStr | Co-development, co-production and co-dissemination of scientific research: a case study to demonstrate mutual benefits |
title_full_unstemmed | Co-development, co-production and co-dissemination of scientific research: a case study to demonstrate mutual benefits |
title_short | Co-development, co-production and co-dissemination of scientific research: a case study to demonstrate mutual benefits |
title_sort | co-development, co-production and co-dissemination of scientific research: a case study to demonstrate mutual benefits |
topic | Marine Biology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8098115/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33849351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2020.0699 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT woodalllucyc codevelopmentcoproductionandcodisseminationofscientificresearchacasestudytodemonstratemutualbenefits AT talmasheena codevelopmentcoproductionandcodisseminationofscientificresearchacasestudytodemonstratemutualbenefits AT steedsoliver codevelopmentcoproductionandcodisseminationofscientificresearchacasestudytodemonstratemutualbenefits AT stefanoudisparis codevelopmentcoproductionandcodisseminationofscientificresearchacasestudytodemonstratemutualbenefits AT jeremiemuzungailemariemay codevelopmentcoproductionandcodisseminationofscientificresearchacasestudytodemonstratemutualbenefits AT decomarmondalain codevelopmentcoproductionandcodisseminationofscientificresearchacasestudytodemonstratemutualbenefits |