Cargando…

Comparing vision and macular thickness in neovascular age-related macular degeneration, diabetic macular oedema and retinal vein occlusion patients treated with intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor injections in clinical practice

OBJECTIVE: To compare the visual outcomes of intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), diabetic macular oedema (DMO) and retinal vein occlusion (RVO) in a real-world setting. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Retrospective...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gurung, Rajya L, FitzGerald, Liesel M, McComish, Bennet J, Hewitt, Alex W, Verma, Nitin, Burdon, Kathryn P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8098929/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34013049
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2021-000749
_version_ 1783688503675060224
author Gurung, Rajya L
FitzGerald, Liesel M
McComish, Bennet J
Hewitt, Alex W
Verma, Nitin
Burdon, Kathryn P
author_facet Gurung, Rajya L
FitzGerald, Liesel M
McComish, Bennet J
Hewitt, Alex W
Verma, Nitin
Burdon, Kathryn P
author_sort Gurung, Rajya L
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare the visual outcomes of intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), diabetic macular oedema (DMO) and retinal vein occlusion (RVO) in a real-world setting. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Retrospective analysis of data from the Tasmanian Ophthalmic Biobank database. The median change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) between baseline and 12 months post initiating intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment were compared between the three diseases. Final BCVA, central macular thickness (CMT), cumulative number of injections and overall predictors of change in BCVA and CMT were also determined. RESULTS: At 12 months, change in BCVA was significantly different between nAMD, DMO and RVO cohorts (p=0.032), with lower median change for DMO (2 letters, range −5 to 20) than for RVO (11 letters, range −20 to 35). Likewise, CMT change was significantly different between the three cohorts (p=0.022), with a smaller reduction in CMT in DMO (−54 µm, range −482 to 50) than RVO patients (−137 µm, range −478 to 43; p=0.033). Total number of injections received (p=0.028) and final BCVA score (p=0.024) were also significantly different between the groups. Baseline BCVA was a negative predictor (p=0.042) and baseline CMT a positive predictor (p<0.001) of outcome. After adjusting for baseline BCVA and CMT, diagnosis of nAMD or RVO was a predictor of visual improvement compared with the DMO. CONCLUSIONS: At the end of 12 months, nAMD and RVO cohorts had the greatest improvement in BCVA, however the final BCVA for DMO was significantly better than for nAMD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8098929
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80989292021-05-18 Comparing vision and macular thickness in neovascular age-related macular degeneration, diabetic macular oedema and retinal vein occlusion patients treated with intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor injections in clinical practice Gurung, Rajya L FitzGerald, Liesel M McComish, Bennet J Hewitt, Alex W Verma, Nitin Burdon, Kathryn P BMJ Open Ophthalmol Retina OBJECTIVE: To compare the visual outcomes of intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), diabetic macular oedema (DMO) and retinal vein occlusion (RVO) in a real-world setting. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Retrospective analysis of data from the Tasmanian Ophthalmic Biobank database. The median change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) between baseline and 12 months post initiating intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment were compared between the three diseases. Final BCVA, central macular thickness (CMT), cumulative number of injections and overall predictors of change in BCVA and CMT were also determined. RESULTS: At 12 months, change in BCVA was significantly different between nAMD, DMO and RVO cohorts (p=0.032), with lower median change for DMO (2 letters, range −5 to 20) than for RVO (11 letters, range −20 to 35). Likewise, CMT change was significantly different between the three cohorts (p=0.022), with a smaller reduction in CMT in DMO (−54 µm, range −482 to 50) than RVO patients (−137 µm, range −478 to 43; p=0.033). Total number of injections received (p=0.028) and final BCVA score (p=0.024) were also significantly different between the groups. Baseline BCVA was a negative predictor (p=0.042) and baseline CMT a positive predictor (p<0.001) of outcome. After adjusting for baseline BCVA and CMT, diagnosis of nAMD or RVO was a predictor of visual improvement compared with the DMO. CONCLUSIONS: At the end of 12 months, nAMD and RVO cohorts had the greatest improvement in BCVA, however the final BCVA for DMO was significantly better than for nAMD. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8098929/ /pubmed/34013049 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2021-000749 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Retina
Gurung, Rajya L
FitzGerald, Liesel M
McComish, Bennet J
Hewitt, Alex W
Verma, Nitin
Burdon, Kathryn P
Comparing vision and macular thickness in neovascular age-related macular degeneration, diabetic macular oedema and retinal vein occlusion patients treated with intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor injections in clinical practice
title Comparing vision and macular thickness in neovascular age-related macular degeneration, diabetic macular oedema and retinal vein occlusion patients treated with intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor injections in clinical practice
title_full Comparing vision and macular thickness in neovascular age-related macular degeneration, diabetic macular oedema and retinal vein occlusion patients treated with intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor injections in clinical practice
title_fullStr Comparing vision and macular thickness in neovascular age-related macular degeneration, diabetic macular oedema and retinal vein occlusion patients treated with intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor injections in clinical practice
title_full_unstemmed Comparing vision and macular thickness in neovascular age-related macular degeneration, diabetic macular oedema and retinal vein occlusion patients treated with intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor injections in clinical practice
title_short Comparing vision and macular thickness in neovascular age-related macular degeneration, diabetic macular oedema and retinal vein occlusion patients treated with intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor injections in clinical practice
title_sort comparing vision and macular thickness in neovascular age-related macular degeneration, diabetic macular oedema and retinal vein occlusion patients treated with intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor injections in clinical practice
topic Retina
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8098929/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34013049
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2021-000749
work_keys_str_mv AT gurungrajyal comparingvisionandmacularthicknessinneovascularagerelatedmaculardegenerationdiabeticmacularoedemaandretinalveinocclusionpatientstreatedwithintravitrealantivascularendothelialgrowthfactorinjectionsinclinicalpractice
AT fitzgeraldlieselm comparingvisionandmacularthicknessinneovascularagerelatedmaculardegenerationdiabeticmacularoedemaandretinalveinocclusionpatientstreatedwithintravitrealantivascularendothelialgrowthfactorinjectionsinclinicalpractice
AT mccomishbennetj comparingvisionandmacularthicknessinneovascularagerelatedmaculardegenerationdiabeticmacularoedemaandretinalveinocclusionpatientstreatedwithintravitrealantivascularendothelialgrowthfactorinjectionsinclinicalpractice
AT hewittalexw comparingvisionandmacularthicknessinneovascularagerelatedmaculardegenerationdiabeticmacularoedemaandretinalveinocclusionpatientstreatedwithintravitrealantivascularendothelialgrowthfactorinjectionsinclinicalpractice
AT vermanitin comparingvisionandmacularthicknessinneovascularagerelatedmaculardegenerationdiabeticmacularoedemaandretinalveinocclusionpatientstreatedwithintravitrealantivascularendothelialgrowthfactorinjectionsinclinicalpractice
AT burdonkathrynp comparingvisionandmacularthicknessinneovascularagerelatedmaculardegenerationdiabeticmacularoedemaandretinalveinocclusionpatientstreatedwithintravitrealantivascularendothelialgrowthfactorinjectionsinclinicalpractice