Cargando…
Safety and efficacy of transcarotid artery revascularisation versus carotid endarterectomy: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis study
INTRODUCTION: In recent years, the transcarotid artery revascularisation (TCAR) with flow reversal technique has been developed to treat carotid artery stenosis. The superiority of TCAR over transfemoral carotid artery stenting has been demonstrated. However, the safety and efficacy of TCAR and caro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8098965/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33947730 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043039 |
_version_ | 1783688510904991744 |
---|---|
author | Bai, Xuesong Zhang, Xiao Yang, Wuyang Wang, Tao Wang, Yan Feng, Yao Yang, Kun Wang, Xue Ma, Yan Jiao, Liqun |
author_facet | Bai, Xuesong Zhang, Xiao Yang, Wuyang Wang, Tao Wang, Yan Feng, Yao Yang, Kun Wang, Xue Ma, Yan Jiao, Liqun |
author_sort | Bai, Xuesong |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: In recent years, the transcarotid artery revascularisation (TCAR) with flow reversal technique has been developed to treat carotid artery stenosis. The superiority of TCAR over transfemoral carotid artery stenting has been demonstrated. However, the safety and efficacy of TCAR and carotid endarterectomy remain unclear. This study aims to introduce a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the morbidity and mortality rates between TCAR and carotid endarterectomy in the treatment of atherosclerotic carotid artery stenosis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol was drafted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols statement. Herein, major databases will be searched, including Medline, Web of Science, Embase and the Cochrane Library, and randomised controlled trials and high-quality observational studies will be included. We will screen all studies published from January 2000 to March 2021. Bias risk will be evaluated using the Cochrane Collaboration criteria or Methodological Index for Non-randomised Studies criteria, depending on the study type. Two reviewers will select eligible studies and extract the data independently. The primary outcome will include stroke or death during the perioperative period and follow-up. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses will be performed to explore any potential sources of heterogeneity. Specific results will be described in a narrative form when available eligible studies are insufficient for meta-analysis. Publication bias will be assessed using a funnel plot. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study will summarise and analyse the existing literature; hence, ethics approval will not be required. The final results may be published at a relevant academic conference or in a journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020178691. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8098965 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80989652021-05-18 Safety and efficacy of transcarotid artery revascularisation versus carotid endarterectomy: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis study Bai, Xuesong Zhang, Xiao Yang, Wuyang Wang, Tao Wang, Yan Feng, Yao Yang, Kun Wang, Xue Ma, Yan Jiao, Liqun BMJ Open Neurology INTRODUCTION: In recent years, the transcarotid artery revascularisation (TCAR) with flow reversal technique has been developed to treat carotid artery stenosis. The superiority of TCAR over transfemoral carotid artery stenting has been demonstrated. However, the safety and efficacy of TCAR and carotid endarterectomy remain unclear. This study aims to introduce a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the morbidity and mortality rates between TCAR and carotid endarterectomy in the treatment of atherosclerotic carotid artery stenosis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol was drafted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols statement. Herein, major databases will be searched, including Medline, Web of Science, Embase and the Cochrane Library, and randomised controlled trials and high-quality observational studies will be included. We will screen all studies published from January 2000 to March 2021. Bias risk will be evaluated using the Cochrane Collaboration criteria or Methodological Index for Non-randomised Studies criteria, depending on the study type. Two reviewers will select eligible studies and extract the data independently. The primary outcome will include stroke or death during the perioperative period and follow-up. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses will be performed to explore any potential sources of heterogeneity. Specific results will be described in a narrative form when available eligible studies are insufficient for meta-analysis. Publication bias will be assessed using a funnel plot. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study will summarise and analyse the existing literature; hence, ethics approval will not be required. The final results may be published at a relevant academic conference or in a journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020178691. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8098965/ /pubmed/33947730 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043039 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Neurology Bai, Xuesong Zhang, Xiao Yang, Wuyang Wang, Tao Wang, Yan Feng, Yao Yang, Kun Wang, Xue Ma, Yan Jiao, Liqun Safety and efficacy of transcarotid artery revascularisation versus carotid endarterectomy: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis study |
title | Safety and efficacy of transcarotid artery revascularisation versus carotid endarterectomy: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis study |
title_full | Safety and efficacy of transcarotid artery revascularisation versus carotid endarterectomy: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis study |
title_fullStr | Safety and efficacy of transcarotid artery revascularisation versus carotid endarterectomy: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis study |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety and efficacy of transcarotid artery revascularisation versus carotid endarterectomy: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis study |
title_short | Safety and efficacy of transcarotid artery revascularisation versus carotid endarterectomy: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis study |
title_sort | safety and efficacy of transcarotid artery revascularisation versus carotid endarterectomy: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis study |
topic | Neurology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8098965/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33947730 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043039 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baixuesong safetyandefficacyoftranscarotidarteryrevascularisationversuscarotidendarterectomyprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisstudy AT zhangxiao safetyandefficacyoftranscarotidarteryrevascularisationversuscarotidendarterectomyprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisstudy AT yangwuyang safetyandefficacyoftranscarotidarteryrevascularisationversuscarotidendarterectomyprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisstudy AT wangtao safetyandefficacyoftranscarotidarteryrevascularisationversuscarotidendarterectomyprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisstudy AT wangyan safetyandefficacyoftranscarotidarteryrevascularisationversuscarotidendarterectomyprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisstudy AT fengyao safetyandefficacyoftranscarotidarteryrevascularisationversuscarotidendarterectomyprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisstudy AT yangkun safetyandefficacyoftranscarotidarteryrevascularisationversuscarotidendarterectomyprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisstudy AT wangxue safetyandefficacyoftranscarotidarteryrevascularisationversuscarotidendarterectomyprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisstudy AT mayan safetyandefficacyoftranscarotidarteryrevascularisationversuscarotidendarterectomyprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisstudy AT jiaoliqun safetyandefficacyoftranscarotidarteryrevascularisationversuscarotidendarterectomyprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisstudy |