Cargando…

The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of assistive technology and telecare for independent living in dementia: a randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVES: The use of assistive technology and telecare (ATT) has been promoted to manage risks associated with independent living in people with dementia but with little evidence for effectiveness. METHODS: Participants were randomly assigned to receive an ATT assessment followed by installation o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Howard, Robert, Gathercole, Rebecca, Bradley, Rosie, Harper, Emma, Davis, Lucy, Pank, Lynn, Lam, Natalie, Talbot, Emma, Hooper, Emma, Winson, Rachel, Scutt, Bethany, Ordonez Montano, Victoria, Nunn, Samantha, Lavelle, Grace, Bateman, Andrew, Bentham, Peter, Burns, Alistair, Dunk, Barbara, Forsyth, Kirsty, Fox, Chris, Poland, Fiona, Leroi, Iracema, Newman, Stanton, O’Brien, John, Henderson, Catherine, Knapp, Martin, Woolham, John, Gray, Richard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8099012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33492349
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaa284
_version_ 1783688520311767040
author Howard, Robert
Gathercole, Rebecca
Bradley, Rosie
Harper, Emma
Davis, Lucy
Pank, Lynn
Lam, Natalie
Talbot, Emma
Hooper, Emma
Winson, Rachel
Scutt, Bethany
Ordonez Montano, Victoria
Nunn, Samantha
Lavelle, Grace
Bateman, Andrew
Bentham, Peter
Burns, Alistair
Dunk, Barbara
Forsyth, Kirsty
Fox, Chris
Poland, Fiona
Leroi, Iracema
Newman, Stanton
O’Brien, John
Henderson, Catherine
Knapp, Martin
Woolham, John
Gray, Richard
author_facet Howard, Robert
Gathercole, Rebecca
Bradley, Rosie
Harper, Emma
Davis, Lucy
Pank, Lynn
Lam, Natalie
Talbot, Emma
Hooper, Emma
Winson, Rachel
Scutt, Bethany
Ordonez Montano, Victoria
Nunn, Samantha
Lavelle, Grace
Bateman, Andrew
Bentham, Peter
Burns, Alistair
Dunk, Barbara
Forsyth, Kirsty
Fox, Chris
Poland, Fiona
Leroi, Iracema
Newman, Stanton
O’Brien, John
Henderson, Catherine
Knapp, Martin
Woolham, John
Gray, Richard
author_sort Howard, Robert
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The use of assistive technology and telecare (ATT) has been promoted to manage risks associated with independent living in people with dementia but with little evidence for effectiveness. METHODS: Participants were randomly assigned to receive an ATT assessment followed by installation of all appropriate ATT devices or limited control of appropriate ATT. The primary outcomes were time to institutionalisation and cost-effectiveness. Key secondary outcomes were number of incidents involving risks to safety, burden and stress in family caregivers and quality of life. RESULTS: Participants were assigned to receive full ATT (248 participants) or the limited control (247 participants). After adjusting for baseline imbalance of activities of daily living score, HR for median pre-institutionalisation survival was 0.84; 95% CI, 0.63 to 1.12; P = 0.20. There were no significant differences between arms in health and social care (mean -£909; 95% CI, -£5,336 to £3,345, P = 0.678) and societal costs (mean -£3,545; 95% CI, -£13,914 to £6,581, P = 0.499). ATT group members had reduced participant-rated quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) at 104 weeks (mean − 0.105; 95% CI, −0.204 to −0.007, P = 0.037) but did not differ in QALYs derived from proxy-reported EQ-5D. DISCUSSION: Fidelity of the intervention was low in terms of matching ATT assessment, recommendations and installation. This, however, reflects current practice within adult social care in England. CONCLUSIONS: Time living independently outside a care home was not significantly longer in participants who received full ATT and ATT was not cost-effective. Participants with full ATT attained fewer QALYs based on participant-reported EQ-5D than controls at 104 weeks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8099012
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80990122021-05-10 The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of assistive technology and telecare for independent living in dementia: a randomised controlled trial Howard, Robert Gathercole, Rebecca Bradley, Rosie Harper, Emma Davis, Lucy Pank, Lynn Lam, Natalie Talbot, Emma Hooper, Emma Winson, Rachel Scutt, Bethany Ordonez Montano, Victoria Nunn, Samantha Lavelle, Grace Bateman, Andrew Bentham, Peter Burns, Alistair Dunk, Barbara Forsyth, Kirsty Fox, Chris Poland, Fiona Leroi, Iracema Newman, Stanton O’Brien, John Henderson, Catherine Knapp, Martin Woolham, John Gray, Richard Age Ageing Research Paper OBJECTIVES: The use of assistive technology and telecare (ATT) has been promoted to manage risks associated with independent living in people with dementia but with little evidence for effectiveness. METHODS: Participants were randomly assigned to receive an ATT assessment followed by installation of all appropriate ATT devices or limited control of appropriate ATT. The primary outcomes were time to institutionalisation and cost-effectiveness. Key secondary outcomes were number of incidents involving risks to safety, burden and stress in family caregivers and quality of life. RESULTS: Participants were assigned to receive full ATT (248 participants) or the limited control (247 participants). After adjusting for baseline imbalance of activities of daily living score, HR for median pre-institutionalisation survival was 0.84; 95% CI, 0.63 to 1.12; P = 0.20. There were no significant differences between arms in health and social care (mean -£909; 95% CI, -£5,336 to £3,345, P = 0.678) and societal costs (mean -£3,545; 95% CI, -£13,914 to £6,581, P = 0.499). ATT group members had reduced participant-rated quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) at 104 weeks (mean − 0.105; 95% CI, −0.204 to −0.007, P = 0.037) but did not differ in QALYs derived from proxy-reported EQ-5D. DISCUSSION: Fidelity of the intervention was low in terms of matching ATT assessment, recommendations and installation. This, however, reflects current practice within adult social care in England. CONCLUSIONS: Time living independently outside a care home was not significantly longer in participants who received full ATT and ATT was not cost-effective. Participants with full ATT attained fewer QALYs based on participant-reported EQ-5D than controls at 104 weeks. Oxford University Press 2021-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8099012/ /pubmed/33492349 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaa284 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Research Paper
Howard, Robert
Gathercole, Rebecca
Bradley, Rosie
Harper, Emma
Davis, Lucy
Pank, Lynn
Lam, Natalie
Talbot, Emma
Hooper, Emma
Winson, Rachel
Scutt, Bethany
Ordonez Montano, Victoria
Nunn, Samantha
Lavelle, Grace
Bateman, Andrew
Bentham, Peter
Burns, Alistair
Dunk, Barbara
Forsyth, Kirsty
Fox, Chris
Poland, Fiona
Leroi, Iracema
Newman, Stanton
O’Brien, John
Henderson, Catherine
Knapp, Martin
Woolham, John
Gray, Richard
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of assistive technology and telecare for independent living in dementia: a randomised controlled trial
title The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of assistive technology and telecare for independent living in dementia: a randomised controlled trial
title_full The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of assistive technology and telecare for independent living in dementia: a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of assistive technology and telecare for independent living in dementia: a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of assistive technology and telecare for independent living in dementia: a randomised controlled trial
title_short The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of assistive technology and telecare for independent living in dementia: a randomised controlled trial
title_sort effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of assistive technology and telecare for independent living in dementia: a randomised controlled trial
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8099012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33492349
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaa284
work_keys_str_mv AT howardrobert theeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofassistivetechnologyandtelecareforindependentlivingindementiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT gathercolerebecca theeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofassistivetechnologyandtelecareforindependentlivingindementiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT bradleyrosie theeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofassistivetechnologyandtelecareforindependentlivingindementiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT harperemma theeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofassistivetechnologyandtelecareforindependentlivingindementiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT davislucy theeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofassistivetechnologyandtelecareforindependentlivingindementiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT panklynn theeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofassistivetechnologyandtelecareforindependentlivingindementiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT lamnatalie theeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofassistivetechnologyandtelecareforindependentlivingindementiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT talbotemma theeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofassistivetechnologyandtelecareforindependentlivingindementiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hooperemma theeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofassistivetechnologyandtelecareforindependentlivingindementiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT winsonrachel theeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofassistivetechnologyandtelecareforindependentlivingindementiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT scuttbethany theeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofassistivetechnologyandtelecareforindependentlivingindementiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT ordonezmontanovictoria theeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofassistivetechnologyandtelecareforindependentlivingindementiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT nunnsamantha theeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofassistivetechnologyandtelecareforindependentlivingindementiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT lavellegrace theeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofassistivetechnologyandtelecareforindependentlivingindementiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT batemanandrew theeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofassistivetechnologyandtelecareforindependentlivingindementiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT benthampeter theeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofassistivetechnologyandtelecareforindependentlivingindementiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT burnsalistair theeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofassistivetechnologyandtelecareforindependentlivingindementiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT dunkbarbara theeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofassistivetechnologyandtelecareforindependentlivingindementiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT forsythkirsty theeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofassistivetechnologyandtelecareforindependentlivingindementiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT foxchris theeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofassistivetechnologyandtelecareforindependentlivingindementiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT polandfiona theeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofassistivetechnologyandtelecareforindependentlivingindementiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT leroiiracema theeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofassistivetechnologyandtelecareforindependentlivingindementiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT newmanstanton theeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofassistivetechnologyandtelecareforindependentlivingindementiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT obrienjohn theeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofassistivetechnologyandtelecareforindependentlivingindementiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hendersoncatherine theeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofassistivetechnologyandtelecareforindependentlivingindementiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT knappmartin theeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofassistivetechnologyandtelecareforindependentlivingindementiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT woolhamjohn theeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofassistivetechnologyandtelecareforindependentlivingindementiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT grayrichard theeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofassistivetechnologyandtelecareforindependentlivingindementiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT howardrobert effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofassistivetechnologyandtelecareforindependentlivingindementiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT gathercolerebecca effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofassistivetechnologyandtelecareforindependentlivingindementiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT bradleyrosie effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofassistivetechnologyandtelecareforindependentlivingindementiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT harperemma effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofassistivetechnologyandtelecareforindependentlivingindementiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT davislucy effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofassistivetechnologyandtelecareforindependentlivingindementiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT panklynn effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofassistivetechnologyandtelecareforindependentlivingindementiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT lamnatalie effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofassistivetechnologyandtelecareforindependentlivingindementiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT talbotemma effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofassistivetechnologyandtelecareforindependentlivingindementiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hooperemma effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofassistivetechnologyandtelecareforindependentlivingindementiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT winsonrachel effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofassistivetechnologyandtelecareforindependentlivingindementiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT scuttbethany effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofassistivetechnologyandtelecareforindependentlivingindementiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT ordonezmontanovictoria effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofassistivetechnologyandtelecareforindependentlivingindementiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT nunnsamantha effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofassistivetechnologyandtelecareforindependentlivingindementiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT lavellegrace effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofassistivetechnologyandtelecareforindependentlivingindementiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT batemanandrew effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofassistivetechnologyandtelecareforindependentlivingindementiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT benthampeter effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofassistivetechnologyandtelecareforindependentlivingindementiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT burnsalistair effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofassistivetechnologyandtelecareforindependentlivingindementiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT dunkbarbara effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofassistivetechnologyandtelecareforindependentlivingindementiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT forsythkirsty effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofassistivetechnologyandtelecareforindependentlivingindementiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT foxchris effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofassistivetechnologyandtelecareforindependentlivingindementiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT polandfiona effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofassistivetechnologyandtelecareforindependentlivingindementiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT leroiiracema effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofassistivetechnologyandtelecareforindependentlivingindementiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT newmanstanton effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofassistivetechnologyandtelecareforindependentlivingindementiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT obrienjohn effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofassistivetechnologyandtelecareforindependentlivingindementiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hendersoncatherine effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofassistivetechnologyandtelecareforindependentlivingindementiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT knappmartin effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofassistivetechnologyandtelecareforindependentlivingindementiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT woolhamjohn effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofassistivetechnologyandtelecareforindependentlivingindementiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT grayrichard effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofassistivetechnologyandtelecareforindependentlivingindementiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial