Cargando…

Diagnostic accuracy of the 4AT for delirium detection in older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: Detection of delirium in hospitalised older adults is recommended in national and international guidelines. The 4 ‘A’s Test (4AT) is a short (<2 minutes) instrument for delirium detection that is used internationally as a standard tool in clinical practice. We performed a systematic re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tieges, Zoë, Maclullich, Alasdair M J, Anand, Atul, Brookes, Claire, Cassarino, Marica, O’connor, Margaret, Ryan, Damien, Saller, Thomas, Arora, Rakesh C, Chang, Yue, Agarwal, Kathryn, Taffet, George, Quinn, Terence, Shenkin, Susan D, Galvin, Rose
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8099016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33951145
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaa224
_version_ 1783688520551890944
author Tieges, Zoë
Maclullich, Alasdair M J
Anand, Atul
Brookes, Claire
Cassarino, Marica
O’connor, Margaret
Ryan, Damien
Saller, Thomas
Arora, Rakesh C
Chang, Yue
Agarwal, Kathryn
Taffet, George
Quinn, Terence
Shenkin, Susan D
Galvin, Rose
author_facet Tieges, Zoë
Maclullich, Alasdair M J
Anand, Atul
Brookes, Claire
Cassarino, Marica
O’connor, Margaret
Ryan, Damien
Saller, Thomas
Arora, Rakesh C
Chang, Yue
Agarwal, Kathryn
Taffet, George
Quinn, Terence
Shenkin, Susan D
Galvin, Rose
author_sort Tieges, Zoë
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Detection of delirium in hospitalised older adults is recommended in national and international guidelines. The 4 ‘A’s Test (4AT) is a short (<2 minutes) instrument for delirium detection that is used internationally as a standard tool in clinical practice. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy of the 4AT for delirium detection. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, clinicaltrials.gov and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, from 2011 (year of 4AT release on the website www.the4AT.com) until 21 December 2019. Inclusion criteria were: older adults (≥65 years); diagnostic accuracy study of the 4AT index test when compared to delirium reference standard (standard diagnostic criteria or validated tool). Methodological quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. Pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity were generated from a bivariate random effects model. RESULTS: Seventeen studies (3,702 observations) were included. Settings were acute medicine, surgery, a care home and the emergency department. Three studies assessed performance of the 4AT in stroke. The overall prevalence of delirium was 24.2% (95% CI 17.8–32.1%; range 10.5–61.9%). The pooled sensitivity was 0.88 (95% CI 0.80–0.93) and the pooled specificity was 0.88 (95% CI 0.82–0.92). Excluding the stroke studies, the pooled sensitivity was 0.86 (95% CI 0.77–0.92) and the pooled specificity was 0.89 (95% CI 0.83–0.93). The methodological quality of studies varied but was moderate to good overall. CONCLUSIONS: The 4AT shows good diagnostic test accuracy for delirium in the 17 available studies. These findings support its use in routine clinical practice in delirium detection. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019133702.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8099016
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80990162021-05-10 Diagnostic accuracy of the 4AT for delirium detection in older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis Tieges, Zoë Maclullich, Alasdair M J Anand, Atul Brookes, Claire Cassarino, Marica O’connor, Margaret Ryan, Damien Saller, Thomas Arora, Rakesh C Chang, Yue Agarwal, Kathryn Taffet, George Quinn, Terence Shenkin, Susan D Galvin, Rose Age Ageing Systematic Review OBJECTIVE: Detection of delirium in hospitalised older adults is recommended in national and international guidelines. The 4 ‘A’s Test (4AT) is a short (<2 minutes) instrument for delirium detection that is used internationally as a standard tool in clinical practice. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy of the 4AT for delirium detection. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, clinicaltrials.gov and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, from 2011 (year of 4AT release on the website www.the4AT.com) until 21 December 2019. Inclusion criteria were: older adults (≥65 years); diagnostic accuracy study of the 4AT index test when compared to delirium reference standard (standard diagnostic criteria or validated tool). Methodological quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. Pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity were generated from a bivariate random effects model. RESULTS: Seventeen studies (3,702 observations) were included. Settings were acute medicine, surgery, a care home and the emergency department. Three studies assessed performance of the 4AT in stroke. The overall prevalence of delirium was 24.2% (95% CI 17.8–32.1%; range 10.5–61.9%). The pooled sensitivity was 0.88 (95% CI 0.80–0.93) and the pooled specificity was 0.88 (95% CI 0.82–0.92). Excluding the stroke studies, the pooled sensitivity was 0.86 (95% CI 0.77–0.92) and the pooled specificity was 0.89 (95% CI 0.83–0.93). The methodological quality of studies varied but was moderate to good overall. CONCLUSIONS: The 4AT shows good diagnostic test accuracy for delirium in the 17 available studies. These findings support its use in routine clinical practice in delirium detection. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019133702. Oxford University Press 2020-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8099016/ /pubmed/33951145 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaa224 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Tieges, Zoë
Maclullich, Alasdair M J
Anand, Atul
Brookes, Claire
Cassarino, Marica
O’connor, Margaret
Ryan, Damien
Saller, Thomas
Arora, Rakesh C
Chang, Yue
Agarwal, Kathryn
Taffet, George
Quinn, Terence
Shenkin, Susan D
Galvin, Rose
Diagnostic accuracy of the 4AT for delirium detection in older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis
title Diagnostic accuracy of the 4AT for delirium detection in older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Diagnostic accuracy of the 4AT for delirium detection in older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Diagnostic accuracy of the 4AT for delirium detection in older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic accuracy of the 4AT for delirium detection in older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Diagnostic accuracy of the 4AT for delirium detection in older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort diagnostic accuracy of the 4at for delirium detection in older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8099016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33951145
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaa224
work_keys_str_mv AT tiegeszoe diagnosticaccuracyofthe4atfordeliriumdetectioninolderadultssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT maclullichalasdairmj diagnosticaccuracyofthe4atfordeliriumdetectioninolderadultssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT anandatul diagnosticaccuracyofthe4atfordeliriumdetectioninolderadultssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT brookesclaire diagnosticaccuracyofthe4atfordeliriumdetectioninolderadultssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT cassarinomarica diagnosticaccuracyofthe4atfordeliriumdetectioninolderadultssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT oconnormargaret diagnosticaccuracyofthe4atfordeliriumdetectioninolderadultssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ryandamien diagnosticaccuracyofthe4atfordeliriumdetectioninolderadultssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sallerthomas diagnosticaccuracyofthe4atfordeliriumdetectioninolderadultssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT arorarakeshc diagnosticaccuracyofthe4atfordeliriumdetectioninolderadultssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT changyue diagnosticaccuracyofthe4atfordeliriumdetectioninolderadultssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT agarwalkathryn diagnosticaccuracyofthe4atfordeliriumdetectioninolderadultssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT taffetgeorge diagnosticaccuracyofthe4atfordeliriumdetectioninolderadultssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT quinnterence diagnosticaccuracyofthe4atfordeliriumdetectioninolderadultssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shenkinsusand diagnosticaccuracyofthe4atfordeliriumdetectioninolderadultssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT galvinrose diagnosticaccuracyofthe4atfordeliriumdetectioninolderadultssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis