Cargando…
Diagnostic accuracy of the 4AT for delirium detection in older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis
OBJECTIVE: Detection of delirium in hospitalised older adults is recommended in national and international guidelines. The 4 ‘A’s Test (4AT) is a short (<2 minutes) instrument for delirium detection that is used internationally as a standard tool in clinical practice. We performed a systematic re...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8099016/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33951145 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaa224 |
_version_ | 1783688520551890944 |
---|---|
author | Tieges, Zoë Maclullich, Alasdair M J Anand, Atul Brookes, Claire Cassarino, Marica O’connor, Margaret Ryan, Damien Saller, Thomas Arora, Rakesh C Chang, Yue Agarwal, Kathryn Taffet, George Quinn, Terence Shenkin, Susan D Galvin, Rose |
author_facet | Tieges, Zoë Maclullich, Alasdair M J Anand, Atul Brookes, Claire Cassarino, Marica O’connor, Margaret Ryan, Damien Saller, Thomas Arora, Rakesh C Chang, Yue Agarwal, Kathryn Taffet, George Quinn, Terence Shenkin, Susan D Galvin, Rose |
author_sort | Tieges, Zoë |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Detection of delirium in hospitalised older adults is recommended in national and international guidelines. The 4 ‘A’s Test (4AT) is a short (<2 minutes) instrument for delirium detection that is used internationally as a standard tool in clinical practice. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy of the 4AT for delirium detection. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, clinicaltrials.gov and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, from 2011 (year of 4AT release on the website www.the4AT.com) until 21 December 2019. Inclusion criteria were: older adults (≥65 years); diagnostic accuracy study of the 4AT index test when compared to delirium reference standard (standard diagnostic criteria or validated tool). Methodological quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. Pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity were generated from a bivariate random effects model. RESULTS: Seventeen studies (3,702 observations) were included. Settings were acute medicine, surgery, a care home and the emergency department. Three studies assessed performance of the 4AT in stroke. The overall prevalence of delirium was 24.2% (95% CI 17.8–32.1%; range 10.5–61.9%). The pooled sensitivity was 0.88 (95% CI 0.80–0.93) and the pooled specificity was 0.88 (95% CI 0.82–0.92). Excluding the stroke studies, the pooled sensitivity was 0.86 (95% CI 0.77–0.92) and the pooled specificity was 0.89 (95% CI 0.83–0.93). The methodological quality of studies varied but was moderate to good overall. CONCLUSIONS: The 4AT shows good diagnostic test accuracy for delirium in the 17 available studies. These findings support its use in routine clinical practice in delirium detection. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019133702. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8099016 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80990162021-05-10 Diagnostic accuracy of the 4AT for delirium detection in older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis Tieges, Zoë Maclullich, Alasdair M J Anand, Atul Brookes, Claire Cassarino, Marica O’connor, Margaret Ryan, Damien Saller, Thomas Arora, Rakesh C Chang, Yue Agarwal, Kathryn Taffet, George Quinn, Terence Shenkin, Susan D Galvin, Rose Age Ageing Systematic Review OBJECTIVE: Detection of delirium in hospitalised older adults is recommended in national and international guidelines. The 4 ‘A’s Test (4AT) is a short (<2 minutes) instrument for delirium detection that is used internationally as a standard tool in clinical practice. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy of the 4AT for delirium detection. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, clinicaltrials.gov and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, from 2011 (year of 4AT release on the website www.the4AT.com) until 21 December 2019. Inclusion criteria were: older adults (≥65 years); diagnostic accuracy study of the 4AT index test when compared to delirium reference standard (standard diagnostic criteria or validated tool). Methodological quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. Pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity were generated from a bivariate random effects model. RESULTS: Seventeen studies (3,702 observations) were included. Settings were acute medicine, surgery, a care home and the emergency department. Three studies assessed performance of the 4AT in stroke. The overall prevalence of delirium was 24.2% (95% CI 17.8–32.1%; range 10.5–61.9%). The pooled sensitivity was 0.88 (95% CI 0.80–0.93) and the pooled specificity was 0.88 (95% CI 0.82–0.92). Excluding the stroke studies, the pooled sensitivity was 0.86 (95% CI 0.77–0.92) and the pooled specificity was 0.89 (95% CI 0.83–0.93). The methodological quality of studies varied but was moderate to good overall. CONCLUSIONS: The 4AT shows good diagnostic test accuracy for delirium in the 17 available studies. These findings support its use in routine clinical practice in delirium detection. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019133702. Oxford University Press 2020-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8099016/ /pubmed/33951145 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaa224 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Tieges, Zoë Maclullich, Alasdair M J Anand, Atul Brookes, Claire Cassarino, Marica O’connor, Margaret Ryan, Damien Saller, Thomas Arora, Rakesh C Chang, Yue Agarwal, Kathryn Taffet, George Quinn, Terence Shenkin, Susan D Galvin, Rose Diagnostic accuracy of the 4AT for delirium detection in older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Diagnostic accuracy of the 4AT for delirium detection in older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Diagnostic accuracy of the 4AT for delirium detection in older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic accuracy of the 4AT for delirium detection in older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic accuracy of the 4AT for delirium detection in older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Diagnostic accuracy of the 4AT for delirium detection in older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | diagnostic accuracy of the 4at for delirium detection in older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8099016/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33951145 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaa224 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tiegeszoe diagnosticaccuracyofthe4atfordeliriumdetectioninolderadultssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT maclullichalasdairmj diagnosticaccuracyofthe4atfordeliriumdetectioninolderadultssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT anandatul diagnosticaccuracyofthe4atfordeliriumdetectioninolderadultssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT brookesclaire diagnosticaccuracyofthe4atfordeliriumdetectioninolderadultssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT cassarinomarica diagnosticaccuracyofthe4atfordeliriumdetectioninolderadultssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT oconnormargaret diagnosticaccuracyofthe4atfordeliriumdetectioninolderadultssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ryandamien diagnosticaccuracyofthe4atfordeliriumdetectioninolderadultssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT sallerthomas diagnosticaccuracyofthe4atfordeliriumdetectioninolderadultssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT arorarakeshc diagnosticaccuracyofthe4atfordeliriumdetectioninolderadultssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT changyue diagnosticaccuracyofthe4atfordeliriumdetectioninolderadultssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT agarwalkathryn diagnosticaccuracyofthe4atfordeliriumdetectioninolderadultssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT taffetgeorge diagnosticaccuracyofthe4atfordeliriumdetectioninolderadultssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT quinnterence diagnosticaccuracyofthe4atfordeliriumdetectioninolderadultssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT shenkinsusand diagnosticaccuracyofthe4atfordeliriumdetectioninolderadultssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT galvinrose diagnosticaccuracyofthe4atfordeliriumdetectioninolderadultssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |