Cargando…
The influence of sham feedback on physiological processing during fear-driven stimulation
Biofeedback constitutes a well-established, non-invasive method to voluntary interfere in emotional processing by means of cognitive strategies. However, treatment durations exhibit strong inter-individual variations and first successes can often be achieved only after a large number of sessions. Sh...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8099069/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33951095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251211 |
_version_ | 1783688527395946496 |
---|---|
author | Ehlers, Jan Grimmer, Janine Strack, Veronika Huckauf, Anke |
author_facet | Ehlers, Jan Grimmer, Janine Strack, Veronika Huckauf, Anke |
author_sort | Ehlers, Jan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Biofeedback constitutes a well-established, non-invasive method to voluntary interfere in emotional processing by means of cognitive strategies. However, treatment durations exhibit strong inter-individual variations and first successes can often be achieved only after a large number of sessions. Sham feedback constitutes a rather untapped approach by providing feedback that does not correspond to the participant’s actual state. The current study aims to gain insights into mechanisms of sham feedback processing in order to support new techniques in biofeedback therapy. We carried out two experiments and applied different types of sham feedback on skin conductance responses and pupil size changes during affective processing. Results indicate that standardized but context-sensitive sham signals based on skin conductance responses exert a stronger influence on emotional regulation compared to individual sham feedback from ongoing pupil dynamics. Also, sham feedback should forego unnatural signal behavior to avoid irritation and skepticism among participants. Altogether, a reasonable combination of stimulus features and sham feedback characteristics enables to considerably reduce the actual bodily responsiveness already within a single session. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8099069 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80990692021-05-17 The influence of sham feedback on physiological processing during fear-driven stimulation Ehlers, Jan Grimmer, Janine Strack, Veronika Huckauf, Anke PLoS One Research Article Biofeedback constitutes a well-established, non-invasive method to voluntary interfere in emotional processing by means of cognitive strategies. However, treatment durations exhibit strong inter-individual variations and first successes can often be achieved only after a large number of sessions. Sham feedback constitutes a rather untapped approach by providing feedback that does not correspond to the participant’s actual state. The current study aims to gain insights into mechanisms of sham feedback processing in order to support new techniques in biofeedback therapy. We carried out two experiments and applied different types of sham feedback on skin conductance responses and pupil size changes during affective processing. Results indicate that standardized but context-sensitive sham signals based on skin conductance responses exert a stronger influence on emotional regulation compared to individual sham feedback from ongoing pupil dynamics. Also, sham feedback should forego unnatural signal behavior to avoid irritation and skepticism among participants. Altogether, a reasonable combination of stimulus features and sham feedback characteristics enables to considerably reduce the actual bodily responsiveness already within a single session. Public Library of Science 2021-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8099069/ /pubmed/33951095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251211 Text en © 2021 Ehlers et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ehlers, Jan Grimmer, Janine Strack, Veronika Huckauf, Anke The influence of sham feedback on physiological processing during fear-driven stimulation |
title | The influence of sham feedback on physiological processing during fear-driven stimulation |
title_full | The influence of sham feedback on physiological processing during fear-driven stimulation |
title_fullStr | The influence of sham feedback on physiological processing during fear-driven stimulation |
title_full_unstemmed | The influence of sham feedback on physiological processing during fear-driven stimulation |
title_short | The influence of sham feedback on physiological processing during fear-driven stimulation |
title_sort | influence of sham feedback on physiological processing during fear-driven stimulation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8099069/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33951095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251211 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ehlersjan theinfluenceofshamfeedbackonphysiologicalprocessingduringfeardrivenstimulation AT grimmerjanine theinfluenceofshamfeedbackonphysiologicalprocessingduringfeardrivenstimulation AT strackveronika theinfluenceofshamfeedbackonphysiologicalprocessingduringfeardrivenstimulation AT huckaufanke theinfluenceofshamfeedbackonphysiologicalprocessingduringfeardrivenstimulation AT ehlersjan influenceofshamfeedbackonphysiologicalprocessingduringfeardrivenstimulation AT grimmerjanine influenceofshamfeedbackonphysiologicalprocessingduringfeardrivenstimulation AT strackveronika influenceofshamfeedbackonphysiologicalprocessingduringfeardrivenstimulation AT huckaufanke influenceofshamfeedbackonphysiologicalprocessingduringfeardrivenstimulation |