Cargando…

Do women prefer caesarean sections? A qualitative evidence synthesis of their views and experiences

BACKGROUND: Caesarean sections (CS) continue to increase worldwide. Multiple and complex factors are contributing to the increase, including non-clinical factors related to individual women, families and their interactions with health providers. This global qualitative evidence synthesis explores wo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Colomar, Mercedes, Opiyo, Newton, Kingdon, Carol, Long, Qian, Nion, Soledad, Bohren, Meghan A., Betran, Ana Pilar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8099111/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33951101
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251072
_version_ 1783688537436061696
author Colomar, Mercedes
Opiyo, Newton
Kingdon, Carol
Long, Qian
Nion, Soledad
Bohren, Meghan A.
Betran, Ana Pilar
author_facet Colomar, Mercedes
Opiyo, Newton
Kingdon, Carol
Long, Qian
Nion, Soledad
Bohren, Meghan A.
Betran, Ana Pilar
author_sort Colomar, Mercedes
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Caesarean sections (CS) continue to increase worldwide. Multiple and complex factors are contributing to the increase, including non-clinical factors related to individual women, families and their interactions with health providers. This global qualitative evidence synthesis explores women’s preferences for mode of birth and factors underlying preferences for CS. METHODS: Systematic database searches (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO) were conducted in December 2016 and updated in May 2019 and February 2021. Studies conducted across all resource settings were eligible for inclusion, except those from China and Taiwan which have been reported in a companion publication. Phenomena of interest were opinions, views and perspectives of women regarding preferences for mode of birth, attributes of CS, societal and cultural beliefs about modes of birth, and right to choose mode of birth. Thematic synthesis of data was conducted. Confidence in findings was assessed using GRADE-CERQual. RESULTS: We included 52 studies, from 28 countries, encompassing the views and perspectives of pregnant women, non-pregnant women, women with previous CS, postpartum women, and women’s partners. Most of the studies were conducted in high-income countries and published between 2011 and 2021. Factors underlying women preferences for CS had to do mainly with strong fear of pain and injuries to the mother and child during labour or birth (High confidence), uncertainty regarding vaginal birth (High confidence), and positive views or perceived advantages of CS (High confidence). Women who preferred CS expressed resoluteness about it, but there were also many women who had a clear preference for vaginal birth and those who even developed strategies to keep their birth plans in environments that were not supportive of vaginal births (High confidence). The findings also identified that social, cultural and personal factors as well as attributes related to health systems impact on the reasons underlying women preferences for various modes of birth (High confidence). CONCLUSIONS: A wide variety of factors underlie women’s preferences for CS in the absence of medical indications. Major factors contributing to perceptions of CS as preferable include fear of pain, uncertainty with vaginal birth and positive views on CS. Interventions need to address these factors to reduce unnecessary CS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8099111
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80991112021-05-17 Do women prefer caesarean sections? A qualitative evidence synthesis of their views and experiences Colomar, Mercedes Opiyo, Newton Kingdon, Carol Long, Qian Nion, Soledad Bohren, Meghan A. Betran, Ana Pilar PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Caesarean sections (CS) continue to increase worldwide. Multiple and complex factors are contributing to the increase, including non-clinical factors related to individual women, families and their interactions with health providers. This global qualitative evidence synthesis explores women’s preferences for mode of birth and factors underlying preferences for CS. METHODS: Systematic database searches (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO) were conducted in December 2016 and updated in May 2019 and February 2021. Studies conducted across all resource settings were eligible for inclusion, except those from China and Taiwan which have been reported in a companion publication. Phenomena of interest were opinions, views and perspectives of women regarding preferences for mode of birth, attributes of CS, societal and cultural beliefs about modes of birth, and right to choose mode of birth. Thematic synthesis of data was conducted. Confidence in findings was assessed using GRADE-CERQual. RESULTS: We included 52 studies, from 28 countries, encompassing the views and perspectives of pregnant women, non-pregnant women, women with previous CS, postpartum women, and women’s partners. Most of the studies were conducted in high-income countries and published between 2011 and 2021. Factors underlying women preferences for CS had to do mainly with strong fear of pain and injuries to the mother and child during labour or birth (High confidence), uncertainty regarding vaginal birth (High confidence), and positive views or perceived advantages of CS (High confidence). Women who preferred CS expressed resoluteness about it, but there were also many women who had a clear preference for vaginal birth and those who even developed strategies to keep their birth plans in environments that were not supportive of vaginal births (High confidence). The findings also identified that social, cultural and personal factors as well as attributes related to health systems impact on the reasons underlying women preferences for various modes of birth (High confidence). CONCLUSIONS: A wide variety of factors underlie women’s preferences for CS in the absence of medical indications. Major factors contributing to perceptions of CS as preferable include fear of pain, uncertainty with vaginal birth and positive views on CS. Interventions need to address these factors to reduce unnecessary CS. Public Library of Science 2021-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8099111/ /pubmed/33951101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251072 Text en © 2021 Colomar et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Colomar, Mercedes
Opiyo, Newton
Kingdon, Carol
Long, Qian
Nion, Soledad
Bohren, Meghan A.
Betran, Ana Pilar
Do women prefer caesarean sections? A qualitative evidence synthesis of their views and experiences
title Do women prefer caesarean sections? A qualitative evidence synthesis of their views and experiences
title_full Do women prefer caesarean sections? A qualitative evidence synthesis of their views and experiences
title_fullStr Do women prefer caesarean sections? A qualitative evidence synthesis of their views and experiences
title_full_unstemmed Do women prefer caesarean sections? A qualitative evidence synthesis of their views and experiences
title_short Do women prefer caesarean sections? A qualitative evidence synthesis of their views and experiences
title_sort do women prefer caesarean sections? a qualitative evidence synthesis of their views and experiences
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8099111/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33951101
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251072
work_keys_str_mv AT colomarmercedes dowomenprefercaesareansectionsaqualitativeevidencesynthesisoftheirviewsandexperiences
AT opiyonewton dowomenprefercaesareansectionsaqualitativeevidencesynthesisoftheirviewsandexperiences
AT kingdoncarol dowomenprefercaesareansectionsaqualitativeevidencesynthesisoftheirviewsandexperiences
AT longqian dowomenprefercaesareansectionsaqualitativeevidencesynthesisoftheirviewsandexperiences
AT nionsoledad dowomenprefercaesareansectionsaqualitativeevidencesynthesisoftheirviewsandexperiences
AT bohrenmeghana dowomenprefercaesareansectionsaqualitativeevidencesynthesisoftheirviewsandexperiences
AT betrananapilar dowomenprefercaesareansectionsaqualitativeevidencesynthesisoftheirviewsandexperiences