Cargando…

Couples’ decision-making on post-partum family planning and antenatal counselling in Uganda: A qualitative study

BACKGROUND: Although health workers have been trained to provide post-partum family planning (PPFP), uptake remains low in Uganda. An important reason is that women want the agreement of their partner, who is often absent at the time of delivery. In order to address this, we aimed to understand the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Willcox, Merlin L., Mubangizi, Vincent, Natukunda, Silvia, Owokuhaisa, Judith, Nahabwe, Haeven, Nakaggwa, Florence, Laughton, Matthew, Chambers, Isabella, Coates, Sabine, King, Emma, Fall, Emma, Muller, Ingrid, Goodhart, Clare, Graffy, Jonathan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8099118/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33951104
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251190
_version_ 1783688539209203712
author Willcox, Merlin L.
Mubangizi, Vincent
Natukunda, Silvia
Owokuhaisa, Judith
Nahabwe, Haeven
Nakaggwa, Florence
Laughton, Matthew
Chambers, Isabella
Coates, Sabine
King, Emma
Fall, Emma
Muller, Ingrid
Goodhart, Clare
Graffy, Jonathan
author_facet Willcox, Merlin L.
Mubangizi, Vincent
Natukunda, Silvia
Owokuhaisa, Judith
Nahabwe, Haeven
Nakaggwa, Florence
Laughton, Matthew
Chambers, Isabella
Coates, Sabine
King, Emma
Fall, Emma
Muller, Ingrid
Goodhart, Clare
Graffy, Jonathan
author_sort Willcox, Merlin L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although health workers have been trained to provide post-partum family planning (PPFP), uptake remains low in Uganda. An important reason is that women want the agreement of their partner, who is often absent at the time of delivery. In order to address this, we aimed to understand the views of couples and explore barriers and facilitators to implementation of antenatal couples’ counselling on PPFP in Uganda. METHODS: We conducted individual interviews with a purposive sample of 12 postpartum and 3 antenatal couples; and 34 focus groups with a total of 323 participants (68 adolescent women, 83 women aged 20–49, 79 men, 93 health workers) in four contrasting communities (urban and rural) in South-West and Central Uganda. These were recorded, transcribed, translated, and analysed thematically. RESULTS: Although most participants felt that it is important for partners to discuss family planning, half of the couples were unaware of each other’s views on contraception. Most had similar views on motivation to use family planning but not on preferred contraceptive methods. Most liked the idea of antenatal couples’ counselling on PPFP. The main barrier was the reluctance of men to attend antenatal clinics (ANC) in health facilities. Respondents felt that Village Health Teams (VHTs) could provide initial counselling on PPFP in couples’ homes (with telephone support from health workers, if needed) and encourage men to attend ANC. Suggested facilitators for men to attend ANC included health workers being more welcoming, holding ANC clinics at weekends and “outreach” clinics (in rural villages far from health facilities). CONCLUSION: Antenatal couples’ counselling has the potential to facilitate agreement PPFP, but some men are reluctant to attend antenatal clinics. Counselling at home by VHTs as well as simple changes to the organisation of antenatal clinics, could make it possible to deliver antenatal couples’ counselling on PPFP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8099118
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80991182021-05-17 Couples’ decision-making on post-partum family planning and antenatal counselling in Uganda: A qualitative study Willcox, Merlin L. Mubangizi, Vincent Natukunda, Silvia Owokuhaisa, Judith Nahabwe, Haeven Nakaggwa, Florence Laughton, Matthew Chambers, Isabella Coates, Sabine King, Emma Fall, Emma Muller, Ingrid Goodhart, Clare Graffy, Jonathan PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Although health workers have been trained to provide post-partum family planning (PPFP), uptake remains low in Uganda. An important reason is that women want the agreement of their partner, who is often absent at the time of delivery. In order to address this, we aimed to understand the views of couples and explore barriers and facilitators to implementation of antenatal couples’ counselling on PPFP in Uganda. METHODS: We conducted individual interviews with a purposive sample of 12 postpartum and 3 antenatal couples; and 34 focus groups with a total of 323 participants (68 adolescent women, 83 women aged 20–49, 79 men, 93 health workers) in four contrasting communities (urban and rural) in South-West and Central Uganda. These were recorded, transcribed, translated, and analysed thematically. RESULTS: Although most participants felt that it is important for partners to discuss family planning, half of the couples were unaware of each other’s views on contraception. Most had similar views on motivation to use family planning but not on preferred contraceptive methods. Most liked the idea of antenatal couples’ counselling on PPFP. The main barrier was the reluctance of men to attend antenatal clinics (ANC) in health facilities. Respondents felt that Village Health Teams (VHTs) could provide initial counselling on PPFP in couples’ homes (with telephone support from health workers, if needed) and encourage men to attend ANC. Suggested facilitators for men to attend ANC included health workers being more welcoming, holding ANC clinics at weekends and “outreach” clinics (in rural villages far from health facilities). CONCLUSION: Antenatal couples’ counselling has the potential to facilitate agreement PPFP, but some men are reluctant to attend antenatal clinics. Counselling at home by VHTs as well as simple changes to the organisation of antenatal clinics, could make it possible to deliver antenatal couples’ counselling on PPFP. Public Library of Science 2021-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8099118/ /pubmed/33951104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251190 Text en © 2021 Willcox et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Willcox, Merlin L.
Mubangizi, Vincent
Natukunda, Silvia
Owokuhaisa, Judith
Nahabwe, Haeven
Nakaggwa, Florence
Laughton, Matthew
Chambers, Isabella
Coates, Sabine
King, Emma
Fall, Emma
Muller, Ingrid
Goodhart, Clare
Graffy, Jonathan
Couples’ decision-making on post-partum family planning and antenatal counselling in Uganda: A qualitative study
title Couples’ decision-making on post-partum family planning and antenatal counselling in Uganda: A qualitative study
title_full Couples’ decision-making on post-partum family planning and antenatal counselling in Uganda: A qualitative study
title_fullStr Couples’ decision-making on post-partum family planning and antenatal counselling in Uganda: A qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Couples’ decision-making on post-partum family planning and antenatal counselling in Uganda: A qualitative study
title_short Couples’ decision-making on post-partum family planning and antenatal counselling in Uganda: A qualitative study
title_sort couples’ decision-making on post-partum family planning and antenatal counselling in uganda: a qualitative study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8099118/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33951104
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251190
work_keys_str_mv AT willcoxmerlinl couplesdecisionmakingonpostpartumfamilyplanningandantenatalcounsellinginugandaaqualitativestudy
AT mubangizivincent couplesdecisionmakingonpostpartumfamilyplanningandantenatalcounsellinginugandaaqualitativestudy
AT natukundasilvia couplesdecisionmakingonpostpartumfamilyplanningandantenatalcounsellinginugandaaqualitativestudy
AT owokuhaisajudith couplesdecisionmakingonpostpartumfamilyplanningandantenatalcounsellinginugandaaqualitativestudy
AT nahabwehaeven couplesdecisionmakingonpostpartumfamilyplanningandantenatalcounsellinginugandaaqualitativestudy
AT nakaggwaflorence couplesdecisionmakingonpostpartumfamilyplanningandantenatalcounsellinginugandaaqualitativestudy
AT laughtonmatthew couplesdecisionmakingonpostpartumfamilyplanningandantenatalcounsellinginugandaaqualitativestudy
AT chambersisabella couplesdecisionmakingonpostpartumfamilyplanningandantenatalcounsellinginugandaaqualitativestudy
AT coatessabine couplesdecisionmakingonpostpartumfamilyplanningandantenatalcounsellinginugandaaqualitativestudy
AT kingemma couplesdecisionmakingonpostpartumfamilyplanningandantenatalcounsellinginugandaaqualitativestudy
AT fallemma couplesdecisionmakingonpostpartumfamilyplanningandantenatalcounsellinginugandaaqualitativestudy
AT mulleringrid couplesdecisionmakingonpostpartumfamilyplanningandantenatalcounsellinginugandaaqualitativestudy
AT goodhartclare couplesdecisionmakingonpostpartumfamilyplanningandantenatalcounsellinginugandaaqualitativestudy
AT graffyjonathan couplesdecisionmakingonpostpartumfamilyplanningandantenatalcounsellinginugandaaqualitativestudy