Cargando…
Couples’ decision-making on post-partum family planning and antenatal counselling in Uganda: A qualitative study
BACKGROUND: Although health workers have been trained to provide post-partum family planning (PPFP), uptake remains low in Uganda. An important reason is that women want the agreement of their partner, who is often absent at the time of delivery. In order to address this, we aimed to understand the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8099118/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33951104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251190 |
_version_ | 1783688539209203712 |
---|---|
author | Willcox, Merlin L. Mubangizi, Vincent Natukunda, Silvia Owokuhaisa, Judith Nahabwe, Haeven Nakaggwa, Florence Laughton, Matthew Chambers, Isabella Coates, Sabine King, Emma Fall, Emma Muller, Ingrid Goodhart, Clare Graffy, Jonathan |
author_facet | Willcox, Merlin L. Mubangizi, Vincent Natukunda, Silvia Owokuhaisa, Judith Nahabwe, Haeven Nakaggwa, Florence Laughton, Matthew Chambers, Isabella Coates, Sabine King, Emma Fall, Emma Muller, Ingrid Goodhart, Clare Graffy, Jonathan |
author_sort | Willcox, Merlin L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Although health workers have been trained to provide post-partum family planning (PPFP), uptake remains low in Uganda. An important reason is that women want the agreement of their partner, who is often absent at the time of delivery. In order to address this, we aimed to understand the views of couples and explore barriers and facilitators to implementation of antenatal couples’ counselling on PPFP in Uganda. METHODS: We conducted individual interviews with a purposive sample of 12 postpartum and 3 antenatal couples; and 34 focus groups with a total of 323 participants (68 adolescent women, 83 women aged 20–49, 79 men, 93 health workers) in four contrasting communities (urban and rural) in South-West and Central Uganda. These were recorded, transcribed, translated, and analysed thematically. RESULTS: Although most participants felt that it is important for partners to discuss family planning, half of the couples were unaware of each other’s views on contraception. Most had similar views on motivation to use family planning but not on preferred contraceptive methods. Most liked the idea of antenatal couples’ counselling on PPFP. The main barrier was the reluctance of men to attend antenatal clinics (ANC) in health facilities. Respondents felt that Village Health Teams (VHTs) could provide initial counselling on PPFP in couples’ homes (with telephone support from health workers, if needed) and encourage men to attend ANC. Suggested facilitators for men to attend ANC included health workers being more welcoming, holding ANC clinics at weekends and “outreach” clinics (in rural villages far from health facilities). CONCLUSION: Antenatal couples’ counselling has the potential to facilitate agreement PPFP, but some men are reluctant to attend antenatal clinics. Counselling at home by VHTs as well as simple changes to the organisation of antenatal clinics, could make it possible to deliver antenatal couples’ counselling on PPFP. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8099118 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80991182021-05-17 Couples’ decision-making on post-partum family planning and antenatal counselling in Uganda: A qualitative study Willcox, Merlin L. Mubangizi, Vincent Natukunda, Silvia Owokuhaisa, Judith Nahabwe, Haeven Nakaggwa, Florence Laughton, Matthew Chambers, Isabella Coates, Sabine King, Emma Fall, Emma Muller, Ingrid Goodhart, Clare Graffy, Jonathan PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Although health workers have been trained to provide post-partum family planning (PPFP), uptake remains low in Uganda. An important reason is that women want the agreement of their partner, who is often absent at the time of delivery. In order to address this, we aimed to understand the views of couples and explore barriers and facilitators to implementation of antenatal couples’ counselling on PPFP in Uganda. METHODS: We conducted individual interviews with a purposive sample of 12 postpartum and 3 antenatal couples; and 34 focus groups with a total of 323 participants (68 adolescent women, 83 women aged 20–49, 79 men, 93 health workers) in four contrasting communities (urban and rural) in South-West and Central Uganda. These were recorded, transcribed, translated, and analysed thematically. RESULTS: Although most participants felt that it is important for partners to discuss family planning, half of the couples were unaware of each other’s views on contraception. Most had similar views on motivation to use family planning but not on preferred contraceptive methods. Most liked the idea of antenatal couples’ counselling on PPFP. The main barrier was the reluctance of men to attend antenatal clinics (ANC) in health facilities. Respondents felt that Village Health Teams (VHTs) could provide initial counselling on PPFP in couples’ homes (with telephone support from health workers, if needed) and encourage men to attend ANC. Suggested facilitators for men to attend ANC included health workers being more welcoming, holding ANC clinics at weekends and “outreach” clinics (in rural villages far from health facilities). CONCLUSION: Antenatal couples’ counselling has the potential to facilitate agreement PPFP, but some men are reluctant to attend antenatal clinics. Counselling at home by VHTs as well as simple changes to the organisation of antenatal clinics, could make it possible to deliver antenatal couples’ counselling on PPFP. Public Library of Science 2021-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8099118/ /pubmed/33951104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251190 Text en © 2021 Willcox et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Willcox, Merlin L. Mubangizi, Vincent Natukunda, Silvia Owokuhaisa, Judith Nahabwe, Haeven Nakaggwa, Florence Laughton, Matthew Chambers, Isabella Coates, Sabine King, Emma Fall, Emma Muller, Ingrid Goodhart, Clare Graffy, Jonathan Couples’ decision-making on post-partum family planning and antenatal counselling in Uganda: A qualitative study |
title | Couples’ decision-making on post-partum family planning and antenatal counselling in Uganda: A qualitative study |
title_full | Couples’ decision-making on post-partum family planning and antenatal counselling in Uganda: A qualitative study |
title_fullStr | Couples’ decision-making on post-partum family planning and antenatal counselling in Uganda: A qualitative study |
title_full_unstemmed | Couples’ decision-making on post-partum family planning and antenatal counselling in Uganda: A qualitative study |
title_short | Couples’ decision-making on post-partum family planning and antenatal counselling in Uganda: A qualitative study |
title_sort | couples’ decision-making on post-partum family planning and antenatal counselling in uganda: a qualitative study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8099118/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33951104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251190 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT willcoxmerlinl couplesdecisionmakingonpostpartumfamilyplanningandantenatalcounsellinginugandaaqualitativestudy AT mubangizivincent couplesdecisionmakingonpostpartumfamilyplanningandantenatalcounsellinginugandaaqualitativestudy AT natukundasilvia couplesdecisionmakingonpostpartumfamilyplanningandantenatalcounsellinginugandaaqualitativestudy AT owokuhaisajudith couplesdecisionmakingonpostpartumfamilyplanningandantenatalcounsellinginugandaaqualitativestudy AT nahabwehaeven couplesdecisionmakingonpostpartumfamilyplanningandantenatalcounsellinginugandaaqualitativestudy AT nakaggwaflorence couplesdecisionmakingonpostpartumfamilyplanningandantenatalcounsellinginugandaaqualitativestudy AT laughtonmatthew couplesdecisionmakingonpostpartumfamilyplanningandantenatalcounsellinginugandaaqualitativestudy AT chambersisabella couplesdecisionmakingonpostpartumfamilyplanningandantenatalcounsellinginugandaaqualitativestudy AT coatessabine couplesdecisionmakingonpostpartumfamilyplanningandantenatalcounsellinginugandaaqualitativestudy AT kingemma couplesdecisionmakingonpostpartumfamilyplanningandantenatalcounsellinginugandaaqualitativestudy AT fallemma couplesdecisionmakingonpostpartumfamilyplanningandantenatalcounsellinginugandaaqualitativestudy AT mulleringrid couplesdecisionmakingonpostpartumfamilyplanningandantenatalcounsellinginugandaaqualitativestudy AT goodhartclare couplesdecisionmakingonpostpartumfamilyplanningandantenatalcounsellinginugandaaqualitativestudy AT graffyjonathan couplesdecisionmakingonpostpartumfamilyplanningandantenatalcounsellinginugandaaqualitativestudy |