Cargando…
Nutritional markers of undiagnosed type 2 diabetes in adults: Findings of a machine learning analysis with external validation and benchmarking
OBJECTIVES: Using a nationally-representative, cross-sectional cohort, we examined nutritional markers of undiagnosed type 2 diabetes in adults via machine learning. METHODS: A total of 16429 men and non-pregnant women ≥ 20 years of age were analysed from five consecutive cycles of the National Heal...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8099133/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33951067 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250832 |
_version_ | 1783688542783799296 |
---|---|
author | De Silva, Kushan Lim, Siew Mousa, Aya Teede, Helena Forbes, Andrew Demmer, Ryan T. Jönsson, Daniel Enticott, Joanne |
author_facet | De Silva, Kushan Lim, Siew Mousa, Aya Teede, Helena Forbes, Andrew Demmer, Ryan T. Jönsson, Daniel Enticott, Joanne |
author_sort | De Silva, Kushan |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Using a nationally-representative, cross-sectional cohort, we examined nutritional markers of undiagnosed type 2 diabetes in adults via machine learning. METHODS: A total of 16429 men and non-pregnant women ≥ 20 years of age were analysed from five consecutive cycles of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Cohorts from years 2013–2016 (n = 6673) was used for external validation. Undiagnosed type 2 diabetes was determined by a negative response to the question “Have you ever been told by a doctor that you have diabetes?” and a positive glycaemic response to one or more of the three diagnostic tests (HbA1c > 6.4% or FPG >125 mg/dl or 2-hr post-OGTT glucose > 200mg/dl). Following comprehensive literature search, 114 potential nutritional markers were modelled with 13 behavioural and 12 socio-economic variables. We tested three machine learning algorithms on original and resampled training datasets built using three resampling methods. From this, the derived 12 predictive models were validated on internal- and external validation cohorts. Magnitudes of associations were gauged through odds ratios in logistic models and variable importance in others. Models were benchmarked against the ADA diabetes risk test. RESULTS: The prevalence of undiagnosed type 2 diabetes was 5.26%. Four best-performing models (AUROC range: 74.9%-75.7%) classified 39 markers of undiagnosed type 2 diabetes; 28 via one or more of the three best-performing non-linear/ensemble models and 11 uniquely by the logistic model. They comprised 14 nutrient-based, 12 anthropometry-based, 9 socio-behavioural, and 4 diet-associated markers. AUROC of all models were on a par with ADA diabetes risk test on both internal and external validation cohorts (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Models performed comparably to the chosen benchmark. Novel behavioural markers such as the number of meals not prepared from home were revealed. This approach may be useful in nutritional epidemiology to unravel new associations with type 2 diabetes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8099133 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80991332021-05-17 Nutritional markers of undiagnosed type 2 diabetes in adults: Findings of a machine learning analysis with external validation and benchmarking De Silva, Kushan Lim, Siew Mousa, Aya Teede, Helena Forbes, Andrew Demmer, Ryan T. Jönsson, Daniel Enticott, Joanne PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: Using a nationally-representative, cross-sectional cohort, we examined nutritional markers of undiagnosed type 2 diabetes in adults via machine learning. METHODS: A total of 16429 men and non-pregnant women ≥ 20 years of age were analysed from five consecutive cycles of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Cohorts from years 2013–2016 (n = 6673) was used for external validation. Undiagnosed type 2 diabetes was determined by a negative response to the question “Have you ever been told by a doctor that you have diabetes?” and a positive glycaemic response to one or more of the three diagnostic tests (HbA1c > 6.4% or FPG >125 mg/dl or 2-hr post-OGTT glucose > 200mg/dl). Following comprehensive literature search, 114 potential nutritional markers were modelled with 13 behavioural and 12 socio-economic variables. We tested three machine learning algorithms on original and resampled training datasets built using three resampling methods. From this, the derived 12 predictive models were validated on internal- and external validation cohorts. Magnitudes of associations were gauged through odds ratios in logistic models and variable importance in others. Models were benchmarked against the ADA diabetes risk test. RESULTS: The prevalence of undiagnosed type 2 diabetes was 5.26%. Four best-performing models (AUROC range: 74.9%-75.7%) classified 39 markers of undiagnosed type 2 diabetes; 28 via one or more of the three best-performing non-linear/ensemble models and 11 uniquely by the logistic model. They comprised 14 nutrient-based, 12 anthropometry-based, 9 socio-behavioural, and 4 diet-associated markers. AUROC of all models were on a par with ADA diabetes risk test on both internal and external validation cohorts (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Models performed comparably to the chosen benchmark. Novel behavioural markers such as the number of meals not prepared from home were revealed. This approach may be useful in nutritional epidemiology to unravel new associations with type 2 diabetes. Public Library of Science 2021-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8099133/ /pubmed/33951067 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250832 Text en © 2021 De Silva et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article De Silva, Kushan Lim, Siew Mousa, Aya Teede, Helena Forbes, Andrew Demmer, Ryan T. Jönsson, Daniel Enticott, Joanne Nutritional markers of undiagnosed type 2 diabetes in adults: Findings of a machine learning analysis with external validation and benchmarking |
title | Nutritional markers of undiagnosed type 2 diabetes in adults: Findings of a machine learning analysis with external validation and benchmarking |
title_full | Nutritional markers of undiagnosed type 2 diabetes in adults: Findings of a machine learning analysis with external validation and benchmarking |
title_fullStr | Nutritional markers of undiagnosed type 2 diabetes in adults: Findings of a machine learning analysis with external validation and benchmarking |
title_full_unstemmed | Nutritional markers of undiagnosed type 2 diabetes in adults: Findings of a machine learning analysis with external validation and benchmarking |
title_short | Nutritional markers of undiagnosed type 2 diabetes in adults: Findings of a machine learning analysis with external validation and benchmarking |
title_sort | nutritional markers of undiagnosed type 2 diabetes in adults: findings of a machine learning analysis with external validation and benchmarking |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8099133/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33951067 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250832 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT desilvakushan nutritionalmarkersofundiagnosedtype2diabetesinadultsfindingsofamachinelearninganalysiswithexternalvalidationandbenchmarking AT limsiew nutritionalmarkersofundiagnosedtype2diabetesinadultsfindingsofamachinelearninganalysiswithexternalvalidationandbenchmarking AT mousaaya nutritionalmarkersofundiagnosedtype2diabetesinadultsfindingsofamachinelearninganalysiswithexternalvalidationandbenchmarking AT teedehelena nutritionalmarkersofundiagnosedtype2diabetesinadultsfindingsofamachinelearninganalysiswithexternalvalidationandbenchmarking AT forbesandrew nutritionalmarkersofundiagnosedtype2diabetesinadultsfindingsofamachinelearninganalysiswithexternalvalidationandbenchmarking AT demmerryant nutritionalmarkersofundiagnosedtype2diabetesinadultsfindingsofamachinelearninganalysiswithexternalvalidationandbenchmarking AT jonssondaniel nutritionalmarkersofundiagnosedtype2diabetesinadultsfindingsofamachinelearninganalysiswithexternalvalidationandbenchmarking AT enticottjoanne nutritionalmarkersofundiagnosedtype2diabetesinadultsfindingsofamachinelearninganalysiswithexternalvalidationandbenchmarking |