Cargando…

Nasal vaccination against SARS-CoV-2: Synergistic or alternative to intramuscular vaccines?

It is striking that all marketed SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are developed for intramuscular administration designed to produce humoral and cell mediated immune responses, preventing viremia and the COVID-19 syndrome. They have a high degree of efficacy in humans (70–95%) depending on the type of vaccine. H...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tiboni, Mattia, Casettari, Luca, Illum, Lisbeth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Published by Elsevier B.V. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8099545/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33964339
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120686
_version_ 1783688592984375296
author Tiboni, Mattia
Casettari, Luca
Illum, Lisbeth
author_facet Tiboni, Mattia
Casettari, Luca
Illum, Lisbeth
author_sort Tiboni, Mattia
collection PubMed
description It is striking that all marketed SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are developed for intramuscular administration designed to produce humoral and cell mediated immune responses, preventing viremia and the COVID-19 syndrome. They have a high degree of efficacy in humans (70–95%) depending on the type of vaccine. However, little protection is provided against viral replication and shedding in the upper airways due to the lack of a local sIgA immune response, indicating a risk of transmission of virus from vaccinated individuals. A range of novel nasal COVID-19 vaccines are in development and preclinical results in non-human primates have shown a promising prevention of replication and shedding of virus due to the induction of mucosal immune response (sIgA) in upper and lower respiratory tracts as well as robust systemic and humoral immune responses. Whether these results will translate to humans remains to be clarified. An IM prime followed by an IN booster vaccination would likely result in a better well-rounded immune response, including prevention (or strong reduction) in viral replication in the upper and lower respiratory tracts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8099545
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Published by Elsevier B.V.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80995452021-05-06 Nasal vaccination against SARS-CoV-2: Synergistic or alternative to intramuscular vaccines? Tiboni, Mattia Casettari, Luca Illum, Lisbeth Int J Pharm Review It is striking that all marketed SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are developed for intramuscular administration designed to produce humoral and cell mediated immune responses, preventing viremia and the COVID-19 syndrome. They have a high degree of efficacy in humans (70–95%) depending on the type of vaccine. However, little protection is provided against viral replication and shedding in the upper airways due to the lack of a local sIgA immune response, indicating a risk of transmission of virus from vaccinated individuals. A range of novel nasal COVID-19 vaccines are in development and preclinical results in non-human primates have shown a promising prevention of replication and shedding of virus due to the induction of mucosal immune response (sIgA) in upper and lower respiratory tracts as well as robust systemic and humoral immune responses. Whether these results will translate to humans remains to be clarified. An IM prime followed by an IN booster vaccination would likely result in a better well-rounded immune response, including prevention (or strong reduction) in viral replication in the upper and lower respiratory tracts. Published by Elsevier B.V. 2021-06-15 2021-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8099545/ /pubmed/33964339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120686 Text en © 2021 Published by Elsevier B.V. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Review
Tiboni, Mattia
Casettari, Luca
Illum, Lisbeth
Nasal vaccination against SARS-CoV-2: Synergistic or alternative to intramuscular vaccines?
title Nasal vaccination against SARS-CoV-2: Synergistic or alternative to intramuscular vaccines?
title_full Nasal vaccination against SARS-CoV-2: Synergistic or alternative to intramuscular vaccines?
title_fullStr Nasal vaccination against SARS-CoV-2: Synergistic or alternative to intramuscular vaccines?
title_full_unstemmed Nasal vaccination against SARS-CoV-2: Synergistic or alternative to intramuscular vaccines?
title_short Nasal vaccination against SARS-CoV-2: Synergistic or alternative to intramuscular vaccines?
title_sort nasal vaccination against sars-cov-2: synergistic or alternative to intramuscular vaccines?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8099545/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33964339
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120686
work_keys_str_mv AT tibonimattia nasalvaccinationagainstsarscov2synergisticoralternativetointramuscularvaccines
AT casettariluca nasalvaccinationagainstsarscov2synergisticoralternativetointramuscularvaccines
AT illumlisbeth nasalvaccinationagainstsarscov2synergisticoralternativetointramuscularvaccines