Cargando…
Nasal vaccination against SARS-CoV-2: Synergistic or alternative to intramuscular vaccines?
It is striking that all marketed SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are developed for intramuscular administration designed to produce humoral and cell mediated immune responses, preventing viremia and the COVID-19 syndrome. They have a high degree of efficacy in humans (70–95%) depending on the type of vaccine. H...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Published by Elsevier B.V.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8099545/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33964339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120686 |
_version_ | 1783688592984375296 |
---|---|
author | Tiboni, Mattia Casettari, Luca Illum, Lisbeth |
author_facet | Tiboni, Mattia Casettari, Luca Illum, Lisbeth |
author_sort | Tiboni, Mattia |
collection | PubMed |
description | It is striking that all marketed SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are developed for intramuscular administration designed to produce humoral and cell mediated immune responses, preventing viremia and the COVID-19 syndrome. They have a high degree of efficacy in humans (70–95%) depending on the type of vaccine. However, little protection is provided against viral replication and shedding in the upper airways due to the lack of a local sIgA immune response, indicating a risk of transmission of virus from vaccinated individuals. A range of novel nasal COVID-19 vaccines are in development and preclinical results in non-human primates have shown a promising prevention of replication and shedding of virus due to the induction of mucosal immune response (sIgA) in upper and lower respiratory tracts as well as robust systemic and humoral immune responses. Whether these results will translate to humans remains to be clarified. An IM prime followed by an IN booster vaccination would likely result in a better well-rounded immune response, including prevention (or strong reduction) in viral replication in the upper and lower respiratory tracts. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8099545 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Published by Elsevier B.V. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80995452021-05-06 Nasal vaccination against SARS-CoV-2: Synergistic or alternative to intramuscular vaccines? Tiboni, Mattia Casettari, Luca Illum, Lisbeth Int J Pharm Review It is striking that all marketed SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are developed for intramuscular administration designed to produce humoral and cell mediated immune responses, preventing viremia and the COVID-19 syndrome. They have a high degree of efficacy in humans (70–95%) depending on the type of vaccine. However, little protection is provided against viral replication and shedding in the upper airways due to the lack of a local sIgA immune response, indicating a risk of transmission of virus from vaccinated individuals. A range of novel nasal COVID-19 vaccines are in development and preclinical results in non-human primates have shown a promising prevention of replication and shedding of virus due to the induction of mucosal immune response (sIgA) in upper and lower respiratory tracts as well as robust systemic and humoral immune responses. Whether these results will translate to humans remains to be clarified. An IM prime followed by an IN booster vaccination would likely result in a better well-rounded immune response, including prevention (or strong reduction) in viral replication in the upper and lower respiratory tracts. Published by Elsevier B.V. 2021-06-15 2021-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8099545/ /pubmed/33964339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120686 Text en © 2021 Published by Elsevier B.V. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Review Tiboni, Mattia Casettari, Luca Illum, Lisbeth Nasal vaccination against SARS-CoV-2: Synergistic or alternative to intramuscular vaccines? |
title | Nasal vaccination against SARS-CoV-2: Synergistic or alternative to intramuscular vaccines? |
title_full | Nasal vaccination against SARS-CoV-2: Synergistic or alternative to intramuscular vaccines? |
title_fullStr | Nasal vaccination against SARS-CoV-2: Synergistic or alternative to intramuscular vaccines? |
title_full_unstemmed | Nasal vaccination against SARS-CoV-2: Synergistic or alternative to intramuscular vaccines? |
title_short | Nasal vaccination against SARS-CoV-2: Synergistic or alternative to intramuscular vaccines? |
title_sort | nasal vaccination against sars-cov-2: synergistic or alternative to intramuscular vaccines? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8099545/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33964339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120686 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tibonimattia nasalvaccinationagainstsarscov2synergisticoralternativetointramuscularvaccines AT casettariluca nasalvaccinationagainstsarscov2synergisticoralternativetointramuscularvaccines AT illumlisbeth nasalvaccinationagainstsarscov2synergisticoralternativetointramuscularvaccines |