Cargando…
The diagnostic accuracy of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted CT imaging in COVID-19 disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Artificial intelligence (AI) systems have become critical in support of decision-making. This systematic review summarizes all the data currently available on the AI-assisted CT-Scan prediction accuracy for COVID-19. The ISI Web of Science, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, Science Direct, P...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Published by Elsevier Ltd.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8099790/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33977119 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.imu.2021.100591 |
_version_ | 1783688646848675840 |
---|---|
author | Moezzi, Meisam Shirbandi, Kiarash Shahvandi, Hassan Kiani Arjmand, Babak Rahim, Fakher |
author_facet | Moezzi, Meisam Shirbandi, Kiarash Shahvandi, Hassan Kiani Arjmand, Babak Rahim, Fakher |
author_sort | Moezzi, Meisam |
collection | PubMed |
description | Artificial intelligence (AI) systems have become critical in support of decision-making. This systematic review summarizes all the data currently available on the AI-assisted CT-Scan prediction accuracy for COVID-19. The ISI Web of Science, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, Science Direct, PROSPERO, and EMBASE were systematically searched. We used the revised Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool to assess all included studies' quality and potential bias. A hierarchical receiver-operating characteristic summary (HSROC) curve and a summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve have been implemented. The area under the curve (AUC) was computed to determine the diagnostic accuracy. Finally, 36 studies (a total of 39,246 image data) were selected for inclusion into the final meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity for AI was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.90–0.91), specificity was 0.91 (95% CI, 0.90–0.92) and the AUC was 0.96 (95% CI, 0.91–0.98). For deep learning (DL) method, the pooled sensitivity was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.90–0.91), specificity was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.87–0.88) and the AUC was 0.96 (95% CI, 0.93–0.97). In case of machine learning (ML), the pooled sensitivity was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.90–0.91), specificity was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.94–0.95) and the AUC was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.96–0.99). AI in COVID-19 patients is useful in identifying symptoms of lung involvement. More prospective real-time trials are required to confirm AI's role for high and quick COVID-19 diagnosis due to the possible selection bias and retrospective existence of currently available studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8099790 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Published by Elsevier Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80997902021-05-06 The diagnostic accuracy of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted CT imaging in COVID-19 disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis Moezzi, Meisam Shirbandi, Kiarash Shahvandi, Hassan Kiani Arjmand, Babak Rahim, Fakher Inform Med Unlocked Article Artificial intelligence (AI) systems have become critical in support of decision-making. This systematic review summarizes all the data currently available on the AI-assisted CT-Scan prediction accuracy for COVID-19. The ISI Web of Science, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, Science Direct, PROSPERO, and EMBASE were systematically searched. We used the revised Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool to assess all included studies' quality and potential bias. A hierarchical receiver-operating characteristic summary (HSROC) curve and a summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve have been implemented. The area under the curve (AUC) was computed to determine the diagnostic accuracy. Finally, 36 studies (a total of 39,246 image data) were selected for inclusion into the final meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity for AI was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.90–0.91), specificity was 0.91 (95% CI, 0.90–0.92) and the AUC was 0.96 (95% CI, 0.91–0.98). For deep learning (DL) method, the pooled sensitivity was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.90–0.91), specificity was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.87–0.88) and the AUC was 0.96 (95% CI, 0.93–0.97). In case of machine learning (ML), the pooled sensitivity was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.90–0.91), specificity was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.94–0.95) and the AUC was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.96–0.99). AI in COVID-19 patients is useful in identifying symptoms of lung involvement. More prospective real-time trials are required to confirm AI's role for high and quick COVID-19 diagnosis due to the possible selection bias and retrospective existence of currently available studies. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2021 2021-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8099790/ /pubmed/33977119 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.imu.2021.100591 Text en © 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Moezzi, Meisam Shirbandi, Kiarash Shahvandi, Hassan Kiani Arjmand, Babak Rahim, Fakher The diagnostic accuracy of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted CT imaging in COVID-19 disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | The diagnostic accuracy of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted CT imaging in COVID-19 disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | The diagnostic accuracy of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted CT imaging in COVID-19 disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | The diagnostic accuracy of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted CT imaging in COVID-19 disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The diagnostic accuracy of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted CT imaging in COVID-19 disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | The diagnostic accuracy of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted CT imaging in COVID-19 disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence-assisted ct imaging in covid-19 disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8099790/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33977119 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.imu.2021.100591 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moezzimeisam thediagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceassistedctimagingincovid19diseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT shirbandikiarash thediagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceassistedctimagingincovid19diseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT shahvandihassankiani thediagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceassistedctimagingincovid19diseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT arjmandbabak thediagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceassistedctimagingincovid19diseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT rahimfakher thediagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceassistedctimagingincovid19diseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT moezzimeisam diagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceassistedctimagingincovid19diseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT shirbandikiarash diagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceassistedctimagingincovid19diseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT shahvandihassankiani diagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceassistedctimagingincovid19diseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT arjmandbabak diagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceassistedctimagingincovid19diseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT rahimfakher diagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceassistedctimagingincovid19diseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |