Cargando…

The diagnostic accuracy of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted CT imaging in COVID-19 disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Artificial intelligence (AI) systems have become critical in support of decision-making. This systematic review summarizes all the data currently available on the AI-assisted CT-Scan prediction accuracy for COVID-19. The ISI Web of Science, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, Science Direct, P...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moezzi, Meisam, Shirbandi, Kiarash, Shahvandi, Hassan Kiani, Arjmand, Babak, Rahim, Fakher
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8099790/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33977119
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.imu.2021.100591
_version_ 1783688646848675840
author Moezzi, Meisam
Shirbandi, Kiarash
Shahvandi, Hassan Kiani
Arjmand, Babak
Rahim, Fakher
author_facet Moezzi, Meisam
Shirbandi, Kiarash
Shahvandi, Hassan Kiani
Arjmand, Babak
Rahim, Fakher
author_sort Moezzi, Meisam
collection PubMed
description Artificial intelligence (AI) systems have become critical in support of decision-making. This systematic review summarizes all the data currently available on the AI-assisted CT-Scan prediction accuracy for COVID-19. The ISI Web of Science, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, Science Direct, PROSPERO, and EMBASE were systematically searched. We used the revised Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool to assess all included studies' quality and potential bias. A hierarchical receiver-operating characteristic summary (HSROC) curve and a summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve have been implemented. The area under the curve (AUC) was computed to determine the diagnostic accuracy. Finally, 36 studies (a total of 39,246 image data) were selected for inclusion into the final meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity for AI was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.90–0.91), specificity was 0.91 (95% CI, 0.90–0.92) and the AUC was 0.96 (95% CI, 0.91–0.98). For deep learning (DL) method, the pooled sensitivity was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.90–0.91), specificity was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.87–0.88) and the AUC was 0.96 (95% CI, 0.93–0.97). In case of machine learning (ML), the pooled sensitivity was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.90–0.91), specificity was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.94–0.95) and the AUC was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.96–0.99). AI in COVID-19 patients is useful in identifying symptoms of lung involvement. More prospective real-time trials are required to confirm AI's role for high and quick COVID-19 diagnosis due to the possible selection bias and retrospective existence of currently available studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8099790
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Published by Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80997902021-05-06 The diagnostic accuracy of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted CT imaging in COVID-19 disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis Moezzi, Meisam Shirbandi, Kiarash Shahvandi, Hassan Kiani Arjmand, Babak Rahim, Fakher Inform Med Unlocked Article Artificial intelligence (AI) systems have become critical in support of decision-making. This systematic review summarizes all the data currently available on the AI-assisted CT-Scan prediction accuracy for COVID-19. The ISI Web of Science, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, Science Direct, PROSPERO, and EMBASE were systematically searched. We used the revised Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool to assess all included studies' quality and potential bias. A hierarchical receiver-operating characteristic summary (HSROC) curve and a summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve have been implemented. The area under the curve (AUC) was computed to determine the diagnostic accuracy. Finally, 36 studies (a total of 39,246 image data) were selected for inclusion into the final meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity for AI was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.90–0.91), specificity was 0.91 (95% CI, 0.90–0.92) and the AUC was 0.96 (95% CI, 0.91–0.98). For deep learning (DL) method, the pooled sensitivity was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.90–0.91), specificity was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.87–0.88) and the AUC was 0.96 (95% CI, 0.93–0.97). In case of machine learning (ML), the pooled sensitivity was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.90–0.91), specificity was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.94–0.95) and the AUC was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.96–0.99). AI in COVID-19 patients is useful in identifying symptoms of lung involvement. More prospective real-time trials are required to confirm AI's role for high and quick COVID-19 diagnosis due to the possible selection bias and retrospective existence of currently available studies. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2021 2021-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8099790/ /pubmed/33977119 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.imu.2021.100591 Text en © 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Moezzi, Meisam
Shirbandi, Kiarash
Shahvandi, Hassan Kiani
Arjmand, Babak
Rahim, Fakher
The diagnostic accuracy of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted CT imaging in COVID-19 disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title The diagnostic accuracy of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted CT imaging in COVID-19 disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full The diagnostic accuracy of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted CT imaging in COVID-19 disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr The diagnostic accuracy of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted CT imaging in COVID-19 disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The diagnostic accuracy of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted CT imaging in COVID-19 disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short The diagnostic accuracy of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted CT imaging in COVID-19 disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence-assisted ct imaging in covid-19 disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8099790/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33977119
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.imu.2021.100591
work_keys_str_mv AT moezzimeisam thediagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceassistedctimagingincovid19diseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shirbandikiarash thediagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceassistedctimagingincovid19diseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shahvandihassankiani thediagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceassistedctimagingincovid19diseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT arjmandbabak thediagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceassistedctimagingincovid19diseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT rahimfakher thediagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceassistedctimagingincovid19diseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT moezzimeisam diagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceassistedctimagingincovid19diseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shirbandikiarash diagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceassistedctimagingincovid19diseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shahvandihassankiani diagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceassistedctimagingincovid19diseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT arjmandbabak diagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceassistedctimagingincovid19diseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT rahimfakher diagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceassistedctimagingincovid19diseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis