Cargando…
Effects of linagliptin vs glimepiride on cognitive performance in type 2 diabetes: results of the randomised double-blind, active-controlled CAROLINA-COGNITION study
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Type 2 diabetes, particularly with concomitant CVD, is associated with an increased risk of cognitive impairment. We assessed the effect on accelerated cognitive decline (ACD) of the DPP-4 inhibitor linagliptin vs the sulfonylurea glimepiride in individuals with type 2 diabetes. MET...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8099814/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33559704 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00125-021-05393-8 |
_version_ | 1783688652680855552 |
---|---|
author | Biessels, Geert Jan Verhagen, Chloë Janssen, Jolien van den Berg, Esther Wallenstein, Gudrun Zinman, Bernard Espeland, Mark A. Johansen, Odd Erik |
author_facet | Biessels, Geert Jan Verhagen, Chloë Janssen, Jolien van den Berg, Esther Wallenstein, Gudrun Zinman, Bernard Espeland, Mark A. Johansen, Odd Erik |
author_sort | Biessels, Geert Jan |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Type 2 diabetes, particularly with concomitant CVD, is associated with an increased risk of cognitive impairment. We assessed the effect on accelerated cognitive decline (ACD) of the DPP-4 inhibitor linagliptin vs the sulfonylurea glimepiride in individuals with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: The CAROLINA-COGNITION study was part of the randomised, double-blind, active-controlled CAROLINA trial that evaluated the cardiovascular safety of linagliptin vs glimepiride in individuals with age ≥40 and ≤85 years and HbA(1c) 48–69 mmol/mol (6.5–8.5%) receiving standard care, excluding insulin therapy. Participants were randomised 1:1 using an interactive telephone- and web-based system and treatment assignment was determined by a computer-generated random sequence with stratification by center. The primary cognitive outcome was occurrence of ACD at end of follow-up, defined as a regression-based index score ≤16th percentile on either the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) or a composite measure of attention and executive functioning, in participants with a baseline MMSE score ≥24. Prespecified additional analyses included effects on ACD at week 160, in subgroups (sex, age, race, ethnicity, depressive symptoms, cardiovascular risk, duration of type 2 diabetes, albuminuria), and absolute changes in cognitive performance. Participants, caregivers, and people involved in measurements, examinations or adjudication, were all masked to treatment assignment. RESULTS: Of 6033 participants recruited from hospital and primary care sites, 3163 (38.0% female, mean age/diabetes duration 64/7.6 years, MMSE score 28.5, HbA(1c) 54 mmol/mol [7.1%]) represent the CAROLINA-COGNITION cohort. Over median 6.1 years, ACD occurred in 27.8% (449/1618, linagliptin) vs 27.6% (426/1545, glimepiride), OR 1.01 (95% CI 0.86, 1.18). Also, no differences in ACD were observed at week 160 (OR 1.07 [0.91, 1.25]), between treatments across subgroups, or for absolute cognitive changes. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: In a large, international outcome trial in people with relatively early type 2 diabetes at elevated cardiovascular risk, no difference in risk for ACD was observed between linagliptin and glimepiride over 6.1 years. FUNDING: This study was sponsored by Boehringer Ingelheim. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01243424. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains peer-reviewed but unedited supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00125-021-05393-8. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8099814 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80998142021-05-11 Effects of linagliptin vs glimepiride on cognitive performance in type 2 diabetes: results of the randomised double-blind, active-controlled CAROLINA-COGNITION study Biessels, Geert Jan Verhagen, Chloë Janssen, Jolien van den Berg, Esther Wallenstein, Gudrun Zinman, Bernard Espeland, Mark A. Johansen, Odd Erik Diabetologia Article AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Type 2 diabetes, particularly with concomitant CVD, is associated with an increased risk of cognitive impairment. We assessed the effect on accelerated cognitive decline (ACD) of the DPP-4 inhibitor linagliptin vs the sulfonylurea glimepiride in individuals with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: The CAROLINA-COGNITION study was part of the randomised, double-blind, active-controlled CAROLINA trial that evaluated the cardiovascular safety of linagliptin vs glimepiride in individuals with age ≥40 and ≤85 years and HbA(1c) 48–69 mmol/mol (6.5–8.5%) receiving standard care, excluding insulin therapy. Participants were randomised 1:1 using an interactive telephone- and web-based system and treatment assignment was determined by a computer-generated random sequence with stratification by center. The primary cognitive outcome was occurrence of ACD at end of follow-up, defined as a regression-based index score ≤16th percentile on either the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) or a composite measure of attention and executive functioning, in participants with a baseline MMSE score ≥24. Prespecified additional analyses included effects on ACD at week 160, in subgroups (sex, age, race, ethnicity, depressive symptoms, cardiovascular risk, duration of type 2 diabetes, albuminuria), and absolute changes in cognitive performance. Participants, caregivers, and people involved in measurements, examinations or adjudication, were all masked to treatment assignment. RESULTS: Of 6033 participants recruited from hospital and primary care sites, 3163 (38.0% female, mean age/diabetes duration 64/7.6 years, MMSE score 28.5, HbA(1c) 54 mmol/mol [7.1%]) represent the CAROLINA-COGNITION cohort. Over median 6.1 years, ACD occurred in 27.8% (449/1618, linagliptin) vs 27.6% (426/1545, glimepiride), OR 1.01 (95% CI 0.86, 1.18). Also, no differences in ACD were observed at week 160 (OR 1.07 [0.91, 1.25]), between treatments across subgroups, or for absolute cognitive changes. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: In a large, international outcome trial in people with relatively early type 2 diabetes at elevated cardiovascular risk, no difference in risk for ACD was observed between linagliptin and glimepiride over 6.1 years. FUNDING: This study was sponsored by Boehringer Ingelheim. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01243424. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains peer-reviewed but unedited supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00125-021-05393-8. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-02-09 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8099814/ /pubmed/33559704 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00125-021-05393-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Biessels, Geert Jan Verhagen, Chloë Janssen, Jolien van den Berg, Esther Wallenstein, Gudrun Zinman, Bernard Espeland, Mark A. Johansen, Odd Erik Effects of linagliptin vs glimepiride on cognitive performance in type 2 diabetes: results of the randomised double-blind, active-controlled CAROLINA-COGNITION study |
title | Effects of linagliptin vs glimepiride on cognitive performance in type 2 diabetes: results of the randomised double-blind, active-controlled CAROLINA-COGNITION study |
title_full | Effects of linagliptin vs glimepiride on cognitive performance in type 2 diabetes: results of the randomised double-blind, active-controlled CAROLINA-COGNITION study |
title_fullStr | Effects of linagliptin vs glimepiride on cognitive performance in type 2 diabetes: results of the randomised double-blind, active-controlled CAROLINA-COGNITION study |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of linagliptin vs glimepiride on cognitive performance in type 2 diabetes: results of the randomised double-blind, active-controlled CAROLINA-COGNITION study |
title_short | Effects of linagliptin vs glimepiride on cognitive performance in type 2 diabetes: results of the randomised double-blind, active-controlled CAROLINA-COGNITION study |
title_sort | effects of linagliptin vs glimepiride on cognitive performance in type 2 diabetes: results of the randomised double-blind, active-controlled carolina-cognition study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8099814/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33559704 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00125-021-05393-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT biesselsgeertjan effectsoflinagliptinvsglimepirideoncognitiveperformanceintype2diabetesresultsoftherandomiseddoubleblindactivecontrolledcarolinacognitionstudy AT verhagenchloe effectsoflinagliptinvsglimepirideoncognitiveperformanceintype2diabetesresultsoftherandomiseddoubleblindactivecontrolledcarolinacognitionstudy AT janssenjolien effectsoflinagliptinvsglimepirideoncognitiveperformanceintype2diabetesresultsoftherandomiseddoubleblindactivecontrolledcarolinacognitionstudy AT vandenbergesther effectsoflinagliptinvsglimepirideoncognitiveperformanceintype2diabetesresultsoftherandomiseddoubleblindactivecontrolledcarolinacognitionstudy AT wallensteingudrun effectsoflinagliptinvsglimepirideoncognitiveperformanceintype2diabetesresultsoftherandomiseddoubleblindactivecontrolledcarolinacognitionstudy AT zinmanbernard effectsoflinagliptinvsglimepirideoncognitiveperformanceintype2diabetesresultsoftherandomiseddoubleblindactivecontrolledcarolinacognitionstudy AT espelandmarka effectsoflinagliptinvsglimepirideoncognitiveperformanceintype2diabetesresultsoftherandomiseddoubleblindactivecontrolledcarolinacognitionstudy AT johansenodderik effectsoflinagliptinvsglimepirideoncognitiveperformanceintype2diabetesresultsoftherandomiseddoubleblindactivecontrolledcarolinacognitionstudy |