Cargando…

Once-Daily Oral Semaglutide Versus Injectable GLP-1 RAs in People with Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled on Basal Insulin: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION: The relative efficacy and safety of once-daily oral semaglutide vs. injectable glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) in subjects with type 2 diabetes (T2D) inadequately controlled on basal insulin were assessed using network meta-analysis (NMA). METHODS: A systematic li...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chubb, Barrie, Gupta, Palvi, Gupta, Jatin, Nuhoho, Solomon, Kallenbach, Klaus, Orme, Michelle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8099977/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33723769
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-021-01034-w
_version_ 1783688681532424192
author Chubb, Barrie
Gupta, Palvi
Gupta, Jatin
Nuhoho, Solomon
Kallenbach, Klaus
Orme, Michelle
author_facet Chubb, Barrie
Gupta, Palvi
Gupta, Jatin
Nuhoho, Solomon
Kallenbach, Klaus
Orme, Michelle
author_sort Chubb, Barrie
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The relative efficacy and safety of once-daily oral semaglutide vs. injectable glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) in subjects with type 2 diabetes (T2D) inadequately controlled on basal insulin were assessed using network meta-analysis (NMA). METHODS: A systematic literature review (SLR) was performed to identify randomised controlled trials of GLP-1 RAs in this population. Data at 26 ± 4 weeks were extracted for efficacy and safety outcomes feasible for the NMA: change from baseline in glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)), weight and blood pressure; HbA(1c) target levels (< 7.0% and ≤ 6.5%); composite endpoint; incidence of nausea, vomiting or diarrhoea. Comparators of interest were all licensed doses of dulaglutide, exenatide, liraglutide, lixisenatide and once-weekly injectable semaglutide. RESULTS: The NMA included seven trials. Once-daily oral semaglutide 14 mg was associated with significantly greater HbA(1c) reductions vs. most comparators (treatment differences: − 0.42 to − 1.32%); differences vs. once-weekly injectable semaglutide (0.5 mg and 1 mg doses) were not statistically significant. Once-daily oral semaglutide 14 mg was associated with significantly greater weight reductions vs. exenatide 2 mg and lixisenatide 20 μg (− 2.21 and − 2.39 kg respectively); non-statistically significant weight reductions in favour of once-daily oral semaglutide 14 mg were observed vs. all other comparators except once-weekly injectable semaglutide 1 mg. Similar trends were observed for the proportion of subjects achieving HbA(1c) < 7.0% and ≤ 6.5% and the composite endpoint. Once-daily oral semaglutide 14 mg was associated with similar odds of experiencing nausea, vomiting or diarrhoea vs. all comparators. CONCLUSION: Once-daily oral semaglutide 14 mg, as an add-on to basal insulin, is an efficacious treatment for reducing HbA(1c) and weight and meeting glycaemic targets at 26 ± 4 weeks. Once-daily oral semaglutide 14 mg also offers the option of an oral treatment with similar or better efficacy and similar tolerability vs. most injectable GLP-1 RAs. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13300-021-01034-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8099977
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80999772021-05-11 Once-Daily Oral Semaglutide Versus Injectable GLP-1 RAs in People with Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled on Basal Insulin: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis Chubb, Barrie Gupta, Palvi Gupta, Jatin Nuhoho, Solomon Kallenbach, Klaus Orme, Michelle Diabetes Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: The relative efficacy and safety of once-daily oral semaglutide vs. injectable glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) in subjects with type 2 diabetes (T2D) inadequately controlled on basal insulin were assessed using network meta-analysis (NMA). METHODS: A systematic literature review (SLR) was performed to identify randomised controlled trials of GLP-1 RAs in this population. Data at 26 ± 4 weeks were extracted for efficacy and safety outcomes feasible for the NMA: change from baseline in glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)), weight and blood pressure; HbA(1c) target levels (< 7.0% and ≤ 6.5%); composite endpoint; incidence of nausea, vomiting or diarrhoea. Comparators of interest were all licensed doses of dulaglutide, exenatide, liraglutide, lixisenatide and once-weekly injectable semaglutide. RESULTS: The NMA included seven trials. Once-daily oral semaglutide 14 mg was associated with significantly greater HbA(1c) reductions vs. most comparators (treatment differences: − 0.42 to − 1.32%); differences vs. once-weekly injectable semaglutide (0.5 mg and 1 mg doses) were not statistically significant. Once-daily oral semaglutide 14 mg was associated with significantly greater weight reductions vs. exenatide 2 mg and lixisenatide 20 μg (− 2.21 and − 2.39 kg respectively); non-statistically significant weight reductions in favour of once-daily oral semaglutide 14 mg were observed vs. all other comparators except once-weekly injectable semaglutide 1 mg. Similar trends were observed for the proportion of subjects achieving HbA(1c) < 7.0% and ≤ 6.5% and the composite endpoint. Once-daily oral semaglutide 14 mg was associated with similar odds of experiencing nausea, vomiting or diarrhoea vs. all comparators. CONCLUSION: Once-daily oral semaglutide 14 mg, as an add-on to basal insulin, is an efficacious treatment for reducing HbA(1c) and weight and meeting glycaemic targets at 26 ± 4 weeks. Once-daily oral semaglutide 14 mg also offers the option of an oral treatment with similar or better efficacy and similar tolerability vs. most injectable GLP-1 RAs. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13300-021-01034-w. Springer Healthcare 2021-03-16 2021-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8099977/ /pubmed/33723769 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-021-01034-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Chubb, Barrie
Gupta, Palvi
Gupta, Jatin
Nuhoho, Solomon
Kallenbach, Klaus
Orme, Michelle
Once-Daily Oral Semaglutide Versus Injectable GLP-1 RAs in People with Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled on Basal Insulin: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis
title Once-Daily Oral Semaglutide Versus Injectable GLP-1 RAs in People with Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled on Basal Insulin: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis
title_full Once-Daily Oral Semaglutide Versus Injectable GLP-1 RAs in People with Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled on Basal Insulin: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis
title_fullStr Once-Daily Oral Semaglutide Versus Injectable GLP-1 RAs in People with Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled on Basal Insulin: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Once-Daily Oral Semaglutide Versus Injectable GLP-1 RAs in People with Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled on Basal Insulin: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis
title_short Once-Daily Oral Semaglutide Versus Injectable GLP-1 RAs in People with Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled on Basal Insulin: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis
title_sort once-daily oral semaglutide versus injectable glp-1 ras in people with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on basal insulin: systematic review and network meta-analysis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8099977/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33723769
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-021-01034-w
work_keys_str_mv AT chubbbarrie oncedailyoralsemaglutideversusinjectableglp1rasinpeoplewithtype2diabetesinadequatelycontrolledonbasalinsulinsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT guptapalvi oncedailyoralsemaglutideversusinjectableglp1rasinpeoplewithtype2diabetesinadequatelycontrolledonbasalinsulinsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT guptajatin oncedailyoralsemaglutideversusinjectableglp1rasinpeoplewithtype2diabetesinadequatelycontrolledonbasalinsulinsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT nuhohosolomon oncedailyoralsemaglutideversusinjectableglp1rasinpeoplewithtype2diabetesinadequatelycontrolledonbasalinsulinsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT kallenbachklaus oncedailyoralsemaglutideversusinjectableglp1rasinpeoplewithtype2diabetesinadequatelycontrolledonbasalinsulinsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT ormemichelle oncedailyoralsemaglutideversusinjectableglp1rasinpeoplewithtype2diabetesinadequatelycontrolledonbasalinsulinsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis