Cargando…

The role of body mass index on quality indicators following minimally-invasive radical prostatectomy

PURPOSE: We sought to determine the role of body mass index (BMI) on quality indicators, such as length of stay and readmission. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was queried to examine the effect of obesity, defined as BMI >30, on outcomes after Minimally Invasiv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pathak, Ram A., Wilson, Robert R.A., Craven, Timothy E., Matz, Ethan, Hemal, Ashok K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Urological Association 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8100006/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33834640
http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/icu.20200411
_version_ 1783688686506868736
author Pathak, Ram A.
Wilson, Robert R.A.
Craven, Timothy E.
Matz, Ethan
Hemal, Ashok K.
author_facet Pathak, Ram A.
Wilson, Robert R.A.
Craven, Timothy E.
Matz, Ethan
Hemal, Ashok K.
author_sort Pathak, Ram A.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: We sought to determine the role of body mass index (BMI) on quality indicators, such as length of stay and readmission. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was queried to examine the effect of obesity, defined as BMI >30, on outcomes after Minimally Invasive Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy (MI-RRP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Utilizing the NSQIP database, patient records were identified using the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code 55866 (laparoscopy, surgical prostatectomy, radical retropubic) during a 10-year period (2007–2017). Obesity was classified according to the CDC classification. Chi-square tests were utilized to evaluate BMI distribution by surgery year. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the relationship of BMI with length of stay (LOS) and hospital readmission within 30 days, after controlling for preoperative variables. RESULTS: Records of 49,238 patients who have undergone MI-RRP during 2007–2017 were evaluated. Mean yearly BMI rose from 28.5 to 29.2, while the percentage of surgical patients with BMI >30 rose by 5% (33% to 38%; p<0.0001) over the study period. Obese patients demonstrated higher morbidity, prolonged LOS, and increased readmission rates after MI-RRP. Obesity severity correlated negatively with quality indicators in a graded fashion. CONCLUSIONS: Obesity rates in patients undergoing MI-RRP increased from 2007–2017. Obese patients are at increased risk of morbidity, prolonged LOS, and readmission within 30 days, following MI-RRP. These patients should not be excluded from MI-RRP; rather, physicians should discuss these increased risks with their patients. Proper weight loss strategies should be instituted preoperatively to mitigate these risks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8100006
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Korean Urological Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81000062021-05-14 The role of body mass index on quality indicators following minimally-invasive radical prostatectomy Pathak, Ram A. Wilson, Robert R.A. Craven, Timothy E. Matz, Ethan Hemal, Ashok K. Investig Clin Urol Original Article PURPOSE: We sought to determine the role of body mass index (BMI) on quality indicators, such as length of stay and readmission. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was queried to examine the effect of obesity, defined as BMI >30, on outcomes after Minimally Invasive Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy (MI-RRP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Utilizing the NSQIP database, patient records were identified using the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code 55866 (laparoscopy, surgical prostatectomy, radical retropubic) during a 10-year period (2007–2017). Obesity was classified according to the CDC classification. Chi-square tests were utilized to evaluate BMI distribution by surgery year. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the relationship of BMI with length of stay (LOS) and hospital readmission within 30 days, after controlling for preoperative variables. RESULTS: Records of 49,238 patients who have undergone MI-RRP during 2007–2017 were evaluated. Mean yearly BMI rose from 28.5 to 29.2, while the percentage of surgical patients with BMI >30 rose by 5% (33% to 38%; p<0.0001) over the study period. Obese patients demonstrated higher morbidity, prolonged LOS, and increased readmission rates after MI-RRP. Obesity severity correlated negatively with quality indicators in a graded fashion. CONCLUSIONS: Obesity rates in patients undergoing MI-RRP increased from 2007–2017. Obese patients are at increased risk of morbidity, prolonged LOS, and readmission within 30 days, following MI-RRP. These patients should not be excluded from MI-RRP; rather, physicians should discuss these increased risks with their patients. Proper weight loss strategies should be instituted preoperatively to mitigate these risks. The Korean Urological Association 2021-05 2021-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8100006/ /pubmed/33834640 http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/icu.20200411 Text en © The Korean Urological Association, 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Pathak, Ram A.
Wilson, Robert R.A.
Craven, Timothy E.
Matz, Ethan
Hemal, Ashok K.
The role of body mass index on quality indicators following minimally-invasive radical prostatectomy
title The role of body mass index on quality indicators following minimally-invasive radical prostatectomy
title_full The role of body mass index on quality indicators following minimally-invasive radical prostatectomy
title_fullStr The role of body mass index on quality indicators following minimally-invasive radical prostatectomy
title_full_unstemmed The role of body mass index on quality indicators following minimally-invasive radical prostatectomy
title_short The role of body mass index on quality indicators following minimally-invasive radical prostatectomy
title_sort role of body mass index on quality indicators following minimally-invasive radical prostatectomy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8100006/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33834640
http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/icu.20200411
work_keys_str_mv AT pathakrama theroleofbodymassindexonqualityindicatorsfollowingminimallyinvasiveradicalprostatectomy
AT wilsonrobertra theroleofbodymassindexonqualityindicatorsfollowingminimallyinvasiveradicalprostatectomy
AT craventimothye theroleofbodymassindexonqualityindicatorsfollowingminimallyinvasiveradicalprostatectomy
AT matzethan theroleofbodymassindexonqualityindicatorsfollowingminimallyinvasiveradicalprostatectomy
AT hemalashokk theroleofbodymassindexonqualityindicatorsfollowingminimallyinvasiveradicalprostatectomy
AT pathakrama roleofbodymassindexonqualityindicatorsfollowingminimallyinvasiveradicalprostatectomy
AT wilsonrobertra roleofbodymassindexonqualityindicatorsfollowingminimallyinvasiveradicalprostatectomy
AT craventimothye roleofbodymassindexonqualityindicatorsfollowingminimallyinvasiveradicalprostatectomy
AT matzethan roleofbodymassindexonqualityindicatorsfollowingminimallyinvasiveradicalprostatectomy
AT hemalashokk roleofbodymassindexonqualityindicatorsfollowingminimallyinvasiveradicalprostatectomy