Cargando…

Stakeholders’ recommendations for revising Good Clinical Practice

The International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) is revising ICH E6 Good Clinical Practice (GCP). The Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative (CTTI) initiated a project to identify and provide ICH with stakeholders’ priority areas and su...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Corneli, Amy, Forrest, Annemarie, Swezey, Teresa, Lin, Li, Tenaerts, Pamela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8100063/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33997463
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100776
_version_ 1783688700323954688
author Corneli, Amy
Forrest, Annemarie
Swezey, Teresa
Lin, Li
Tenaerts, Pamela
author_facet Corneli, Amy
Forrest, Annemarie
Swezey, Teresa
Lin, Li
Tenaerts, Pamela
author_sort Corneli, Amy
collection PubMed
description The International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) is revising ICH E6 Good Clinical Practice (GCP). The Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative (CTTI) initiated a project to identify and provide ICH with stakeholders’ priority areas and suggestions for revising ICH E6 GCP. We conducted a global online survey to identify areas of ICH E6 GCP that are and are not in need of revision. A total of 327 stakeholders completed the survey. Stakeholders represent many research roles and types of organizations, are employed in 39 countries, and conduct research in 153 countries. The ICH E6 GCP principles mentioned most often (range, 25%–29%) in need of revision were implementing systems that assure quality, providing medical care by qualified physicians/dentists, protecting confidentiality and privacy, obtaining informed consent, and documenting and storing information. The Investigator section (n = 244, 75%) and Sponsor section (n = 242, 74%) of ICH E6 GCP were identified as needing the most revision and the Investigator Brochure section (n = 166, 51%) as needing the least revision. The topic most frequently mentioned as needing revision is Monitoring (n = 146; 45%) in the Sponsor section. Although none of the principles or topics in ICH E6 GCP were identified as needing revision by the majority of stakeholders, a meaningful percentage of stakeholders identified areas that they believe need revision. These findings, which represent the views of a wide variety of stakeholders, may be useful to ICH for identifying where specifically to focus their revision efforts. CTTI provided the final report to ICH with the project findings for their consideration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8100063
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81000632021-05-13 Stakeholders’ recommendations for revising Good Clinical Practice Corneli, Amy Forrest, Annemarie Swezey, Teresa Lin, Li Tenaerts, Pamela Contemp Clin Trials Commun Article The International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) is revising ICH E6 Good Clinical Practice (GCP). The Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative (CTTI) initiated a project to identify and provide ICH with stakeholders’ priority areas and suggestions for revising ICH E6 GCP. We conducted a global online survey to identify areas of ICH E6 GCP that are and are not in need of revision. A total of 327 stakeholders completed the survey. Stakeholders represent many research roles and types of organizations, are employed in 39 countries, and conduct research in 153 countries. The ICH E6 GCP principles mentioned most often (range, 25%–29%) in need of revision were implementing systems that assure quality, providing medical care by qualified physicians/dentists, protecting confidentiality and privacy, obtaining informed consent, and documenting and storing information. The Investigator section (n = 244, 75%) and Sponsor section (n = 242, 74%) of ICH E6 GCP were identified as needing the most revision and the Investigator Brochure section (n = 166, 51%) as needing the least revision. The topic most frequently mentioned as needing revision is Monitoring (n = 146; 45%) in the Sponsor section. Although none of the principles or topics in ICH E6 GCP were identified as needing revision by the majority of stakeholders, a meaningful percentage of stakeholders identified areas that they believe need revision. These findings, which represent the views of a wide variety of stakeholders, may be useful to ICH for identifying where specifically to focus their revision efforts. CTTI provided the final report to ICH with the project findings for their consideration. Elsevier 2021-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8100063/ /pubmed/33997463 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100776 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Corneli, Amy
Forrest, Annemarie
Swezey, Teresa
Lin, Li
Tenaerts, Pamela
Stakeholders’ recommendations for revising Good Clinical Practice
title Stakeholders’ recommendations for revising Good Clinical Practice
title_full Stakeholders’ recommendations for revising Good Clinical Practice
title_fullStr Stakeholders’ recommendations for revising Good Clinical Practice
title_full_unstemmed Stakeholders’ recommendations for revising Good Clinical Practice
title_short Stakeholders’ recommendations for revising Good Clinical Practice
title_sort stakeholders’ recommendations for revising good clinical practice
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8100063/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33997463
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100776
work_keys_str_mv AT corneliamy stakeholdersrecommendationsforrevisinggoodclinicalpractice
AT forrestannemarie stakeholdersrecommendationsforrevisinggoodclinicalpractice
AT swezeyteresa stakeholdersrecommendationsforrevisinggoodclinicalpractice
AT linli stakeholdersrecommendationsforrevisinggoodclinicalpractice
AT tenaertspamela stakeholdersrecommendationsforrevisinggoodclinicalpractice