Cargando…
Stakeholders’ recommendations for revising Good Clinical Practice
The International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) is revising ICH E6 Good Clinical Practice (GCP). The Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative (CTTI) initiated a project to identify and provide ICH with stakeholders’ priority areas and su...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8100063/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33997463 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100776 |
_version_ | 1783688700323954688 |
---|---|
author | Corneli, Amy Forrest, Annemarie Swezey, Teresa Lin, Li Tenaerts, Pamela |
author_facet | Corneli, Amy Forrest, Annemarie Swezey, Teresa Lin, Li Tenaerts, Pamela |
author_sort | Corneli, Amy |
collection | PubMed |
description | The International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) is revising ICH E6 Good Clinical Practice (GCP). The Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative (CTTI) initiated a project to identify and provide ICH with stakeholders’ priority areas and suggestions for revising ICH E6 GCP. We conducted a global online survey to identify areas of ICH E6 GCP that are and are not in need of revision. A total of 327 stakeholders completed the survey. Stakeholders represent many research roles and types of organizations, are employed in 39 countries, and conduct research in 153 countries. The ICH E6 GCP principles mentioned most often (range, 25%–29%) in need of revision were implementing systems that assure quality, providing medical care by qualified physicians/dentists, protecting confidentiality and privacy, obtaining informed consent, and documenting and storing information. The Investigator section (n = 244, 75%) and Sponsor section (n = 242, 74%) of ICH E6 GCP were identified as needing the most revision and the Investigator Brochure section (n = 166, 51%) as needing the least revision. The topic most frequently mentioned as needing revision is Monitoring (n = 146; 45%) in the Sponsor section. Although none of the principles or topics in ICH E6 GCP were identified as needing revision by the majority of stakeholders, a meaningful percentage of stakeholders identified areas that they believe need revision. These findings, which represent the views of a wide variety of stakeholders, may be useful to ICH for identifying where specifically to focus their revision efforts. CTTI provided the final report to ICH with the project findings for their consideration. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8100063 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81000632021-05-13 Stakeholders’ recommendations for revising Good Clinical Practice Corneli, Amy Forrest, Annemarie Swezey, Teresa Lin, Li Tenaerts, Pamela Contemp Clin Trials Commun Article The International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) is revising ICH E6 Good Clinical Practice (GCP). The Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative (CTTI) initiated a project to identify and provide ICH with stakeholders’ priority areas and suggestions for revising ICH E6 GCP. We conducted a global online survey to identify areas of ICH E6 GCP that are and are not in need of revision. A total of 327 stakeholders completed the survey. Stakeholders represent many research roles and types of organizations, are employed in 39 countries, and conduct research in 153 countries. The ICH E6 GCP principles mentioned most often (range, 25%–29%) in need of revision were implementing systems that assure quality, providing medical care by qualified physicians/dentists, protecting confidentiality and privacy, obtaining informed consent, and documenting and storing information. The Investigator section (n = 244, 75%) and Sponsor section (n = 242, 74%) of ICH E6 GCP were identified as needing the most revision and the Investigator Brochure section (n = 166, 51%) as needing the least revision. The topic most frequently mentioned as needing revision is Monitoring (n = 146; 45%) in the Sponsor section. Although none of the principles or topics in ICH E6 GCP were identified as needing revision by the majority of stakeholders, a meaningful percentage of stakeholders identified areas that they believe need revision. These findings, which represent the views of a wide variety of stakeholders, may be useful to ICH for identifying where specifically to focus their revision efforts. CTTI provided the final report to ICH with the project findings for their consideration. Elsevier 2021-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8100063/ /pubmed/33997463 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100776 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Corneli, Amy Forrest, Annemarie Swezey, Teresa Lin, Li Tenaerts, Pamela Stakeholders’ recommendations for revising Good Clinical Practice |
title | Stakeholders’ recommendations for revising Good Clinical Practice |
title_full | Stakeholders’ recommendations for revising Good Clinical Practice |
title_fullStr | Stakeholders’ recommendations for revising Good Clinical Practice |
title_full_unstemmed | Stakeholders’ recommendations for revising Good Clinical Practice |
title_short | Stakeholders’ recommendations for revising Good Clinical Practice |
title_sort | stakeholders’ recommendations for revising good clinical practice |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8100063/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33997463 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100776 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT corneliamy stakeholdersrecommendationsforrevisinggoodclinicalpractice AT forrestannemarie stakeholdersrecommendationsforrevisinggoodclinicalpractice AT swezeyteresa stakeholdersrecommendationsforrevisinggoodclinicalpractice AT linli stakeholdersrecommendationsforrevisinggoodclinicalpractice AT tenaertspamela stakeholdersrecommendationsforrevisinggoodclinicalpractice |