Cargando…

Volumetric metamaterials versus impedance surfaces in scattering applications

Artificially created media allow employing material parameters as additional valuable degrees of freedom in tailoring electromagnetic scattering. In particular, metamaterials with either negative permeability or permittivity allow creating deeply subwavelength resonant structures with relatively hig...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kosulnikov, S., Filonov, D., Boag, A., Ginzburg, P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8100134/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33953249
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88421-2
_version_ 1783688716114460672
author Kosulnikov, S.
Filonov, D.
Boag, A.
Ginzburg, P.
author_facet Kosulnikov, S.
Filonov, D.
Boag, A.
Ginzburg, P.
author_sort Kosulnikov, S.
collection PubMed
description Artificially created media allow employing material parameters as additional valuable degrees of freedom in tailoring electromagnetic scattering. In particular, metamaterials with either negative permeability or permittivity allow creating deeply subwavelength resonant structures with relatively high scattering cross-sections. However, the equivalence principle allows replacing volumetric structures with properly designed curved impedance surfaces, ensuring the same electromagnetic properties. Here, we examine this statement from a practical standpoint, considering two structures, having a dipolar electric resonance at the same frequency. The first realization is based on arrays of inductively loaded electric dipoles printed on stacked circuit boards (a volumetric metamaterial), while the second structure utilizes a 4-wire spiral on a spherical surface (surface impedance realization). An intermediate conclusion is that the surface implementation tends to outperform the volumetric counterparts in the scenario when a single resonance is involved. However, in the case where multiple resonances are overlapping and lossy materials are involved, volumetric realization can have an advantage. The discussed structures are of significant importance to the field of electrically small antennas, superdirective antennas, and superscatterers, which find use in wireless communications and radar applications, to name just a few.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8100134
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81001342021-05-07 Volumetric metamaterials versus impedance surfaces in scattering applications Kosulnikov, S. Filonov, D. Boag, A. Ginzburg, P. Sci Rep Article Artificially created media allow employing material parameters as additional valuable degrees of freedom in tailoring electromagnetic scattering. In particular, metamaterials with either negative permeability or permittivity allow creating deeply subwavelength resonant structures with relatively high scattering cross-sections. However, the equivalence principle allows replacing volumetric structures with properly designed curved impedance surfaces, ensuring the same electromagnetic properties. Here, we examine this statement from a practical standpoint, considering two structures, having a dipolar electric resonance at the same frequency. The first realization is based on arrays of inductively loaded electric dipoles printed on stacked circuit boards (a volumetric metamaterial), while the second structure utilizes a 4-wire spiral on a spherical surface (surface impedance realization). An intermediate conclusion is that the surface implementation tends to outperform the volumetric counterparts in the scenario when a single resonance is involved. However, in the case where multiple resonances are overlapping and lossy materials are involved, volumetric realization can have an advantage. The discussed structures are of significant importance to the field of electrically small antennas, superdirective antennas, and superscatterers, which find use in wireless communications and radar applications, to name just a few. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8100134/ /pubmed/33953249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88421-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Kosulnikov, S.
Filonov, D.
Boag, A.
Ginzburg, P.
Volumetric metamaterials versus impedance surfaces in scattering applications
title Volumetric metamaterials versus impedance surfaces in scattering applications
title_full Volumetric metamaterials versus impedance surfaces in scattering applications
title_fullStr Volumetric metamaterials versus impedance surfaces in scattering applications
title_full_unstemmed Volumetric metamaterials versus impedance surfaces in scattering applications
title_short Volumetric metamaterials versus impedance surfaces in scattering applications
title_sort volumetric metamaterials versus impedance surfaces in scattering applications
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8100134/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33953249
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88421-2
work_keys_str_mv AT kosulnikovs volumetricmetamaterialsversusimpedancesurfacesinscatteringapplications
AT filonovd volumetricmetamaterialsversusimpedancesurfacesinscatteringapplications
AT boaga volumetricmetamaterialsversusimpedancesurfacesinscatteringapplications
AT ginzburgp volumetricmetamaterialsversusimpedancesurfacesinscatteringapplications