Cargando…
The Effects of Prioritizing Lead or Boulder Climbing Among Intermediate Climbers
This study compared the effects of prioritizing lead climbing or boulder climbing on climbing-specific strength and endurance, as well as climbing performance. Fourteen active climbers were randomized to a boulder climbing training group (BCT: age = 27.2 ± 4.4 years, body mass = 65.8 ± 5.5 kg, heigh...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8100213/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33969299 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2021.661167 |
_version_ | 1783688734847270912 |
---|---|
author | Stien, Nicolay Frøysaker, Tor Frithjof Hermans, Espen Vereide, Vegard Albert Andersen, Vidar Saeterbakken, Atle Hole |
author_facet | Stien, Nicolay Frøysaker, Tor Frithjof Hermans, Espen Vereide, Vegard Albert Andersen, Vidar Saeterbakken, Atle Hole |
author_sort | Stien, Nicolay |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study compared the effects of prioritizing lead climbing or boulder climbing on climbing-specific strength and endurance, as well as climbing performance. Fourteen active climbers were randomized to a boulder climbing training group (BCT: age = 27.2 ± 4.4 years, body mass = 65.8 ± 5.5 kg, height = 173.3 ± 3.8 cm) or a lead-climbing training group (LCT: age = 27.7 ± 6.1 years, body mass = 70.2 ± 4.4 kg, height = 177.7 ± 4.4 cm). The groups participated in a 5-week training period consisting of 15 sessions, performing either two weekly bouldering sessions and one maintenance-session of lead-climbing (BCT) or two weekly lead-climbing sessions and one maintenance-session of bouldering (LCT). Pre- and post-training, maximal force and rate of force development (RFD) were measured during isometric pull-ups performed on a jug hold and a shallow rung, and during an isolated finger-strength test. Lead-climbing and bouldering performance were also measured, along with an intermittent forearm endurance test. The pre-to-post changes were not significantly different between the groups for any of the parameters (P = 0.062–0.710). However, both the BCT (ES = 0.30, P = 0.049) and LCT (ES = 0.41, P = 0.046) groups improved strength in the isometric pull-up performed using the jug, whereas neither group improved force in the rung condition (P = 0.054 and P = 0.084) or RFD (P = 0.060 and P = 0.070). Furthermore, climbing and bouldering performance remained unchanged in both groups (P = 0.210–0.895). The LCT group improved forearm endurance (ES = 0.55, P = 0.007), while the BCT group improved isolated finger strength (ES = 0.35, P = 0.015). In addition to isometric pull-up strength, bouldering can increase isolated finger strength while lead-climbing may improve forearm endurance. A 5-week period prioritizing one discipline can be safely implemented for advanced to intermediate climbers without risking declined performance in the non-prioritized discipline. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8100213 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81002132021-05-07 The Effects of Prioritizing Lead or Boulder Climbing Among Intermediate Climbers Stien, Nicolay Frøysaker, Tor Frithjof Hermans, Espen Vereide, Vegard Albert Andersen, Vidar Saeterbakken, Atle Hole Front Sports Act Living Sports and Active Living This study compared the effects of prioritizing lead climbing or boulder climbing on climbing-specific strength and endurance, as well as climbing performance. Fourteen active climbers were randomized to a boulder climbing training group (BCT: age = 27.2 ± 4.4 years, body mass = 65.8 ± 5.5 kg, height = 173.3 ± 3.8 cm) or a lead-climbing training group (LCT: age = 27.7 ± 6.1 years, body mass = 70.2 ± 4.4 kg, height = 177.7 ± 4.4 cm). The groups participated in a 5-week training period consisting of 15 sessions, performing either two weekly bouldering sessions and one maintenance-session of lead-climbing (BCT) or two weekly lead-climbing sessions and one maintenance-session of bouldering (LCT). Pre- and post-training, maximal force and rate of force development (RFD) were measured during isometric pull-ups performed on a jug hold and a shallow rung, and during an isolated finger-strength test. Lead-climbing and bouldering performance were also measured, along with an intermittent forearm endurance test. The pre-to-post changes were not significantly different between the groups for any of the parameters (P = 0.062–0.710). However, both the BCT (ES = 0.30, P = 0.049) and LCT (ES = 0.41, P = 0.046) groups improved strength in the isometric pull-up performed using the jug, whereas neither group improved force in the rung condition (P = 0.054 and P = 0.084) or RFD (P = 0.060 and P = 0.070). Furthermore, climbing and bouldering performance remained unchanged in both groups (P = 0.210–0.895). The LCT group improved forearm endurance (ES = 0.55, P = 0.007), while the BCT group improved isolated finger strength (ES = 0.35, P = 0.015). In addition to isometric pull-up strength, bouldering can increase isolated finger strength while lead-climbing may improve forearm endurance. A 5-week period prioritizing one discipline can be safely implemented for advanced to intermediate climbers without risking declined performance in the non-prioritized discipline. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8100213/ /pubmed/33969299 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2021.661167 Text en Copyright © 2021 Stien, Frøysaker, Hermans, Vereide, Andersen and Saeterbakken. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Sports and Active Living Stien, Nicolay Frøysaker, Tor Frithjof Hermans, Espen Vereide, Vegard Albert Andersen, Vidar Saeterbakken, Atle Hole The Effects of Prioritizing Lead or Boulder Climbing Among Intermediate Climbers |
title | The Effects of Prioritizing Lead or Boulder Climbing Among Intermediate Climbers |
title_full | The Effects of Prioritizing Lead or Boulder Climbing Among Intermediate Climbers |
title_fullStr | The Effects of Prioritizing Lead or Boulder Climbing Among Intermediate Climbers |
title_full_unstemmed | The Effects of Prioritizing Lead or Boulder Climbing Among Intermediate Climbers |
title_short | The Effects of Prioritizing Lead or Boulder Climbing Among Intermediate Climbers |
title_sort | effects of prioritizing lead or boulder climbing among intermediate climbers |
topic | Sports and Active Living |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8100213/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33969299 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2021.661167 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stiennicolay theeffectsofprioritizingleadorboulderclimbingamongintermediateclimbers AT frøysakertorfrithjof theeffectsofprioritizingleadorboulderclimbingamongintermediateclimbers AT hermansespen theeffectsofprioritizingleadorboulderclimbingamongintermediateclimbers AT vereidevegardalbert theeffectsofprioritizingleadorboulderclimbingamongintermediateclimbers AT andersenvidar theeffectsofprioritizingleadorboulderclimbingamongintermediateclimbers AT saeterbakkenatlehole theeffectsofprioritizingleadorboulderclimbingamongintermediateclimbers AT stiennicolay effectsofprioritizingleadorboulderclimbingamongintermediateclimbers AT frøysakertorfrithjof effectsofprioritizingleadorboulderclimbingamongintermediateclimbers AT hermansespen effectsofprioritizingleadorboulderclimbingamongintermediateclimbers AT vereidevegardalbert effectsofprioritizingleadorboulderclimbingamongintermediateclimbers AT andersenvidar effectsofprioritizingleadorboulderclimbingamongintermediateclimbers AT saeterbakkenatlehole effectsofprioritizingleadorboulderclimbingamongintermediateclimbers |