Cargando…

The Effects of Prioritizing Lead or Boulder Climbing Among Intermediate Climbers

This study compared the effects of prioritizing lead climbing or boulder climbing on climbing-specific strength and endurance, as well as climbing performance. Fourteen active climbers were randomized to a boulder climbing training group (BCT: age = 27.2 ± 4.4 years, body mass = 65.8 ± 5.5 kg, heigh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stien, Nicolay, Frøysaker, Tor Frithjof, Hermans, Espen, Vereide, Vegard Albert, Andersen, Vidar, Saeterbakken, Atle Hole
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8100213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33969299
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2021.661167
_version_ 1783688734847270912
author Stien, Nicolay
Frøysaker, Tor Frithjof
Hermans, Espen
Vereide, Vegard Albert
Andersen, Vidar
Saeterbakken, Atle Hole
author_facet Stien, Nicolay
Frøysaker, Tor Frithjof
Hermans, Espen
Vereide, Vegard Albert
Andersen, Vidar
Saeterbakken, Atle Hole
author_sort Stien, Nicolay
collection PubMed
description This study compared the effects of prioritizing lead climbing or boulder climbing on climbing-specific strength and endurance, as well as climbing performance. Fourteen active climbers were randomized to a boulder climbing training group (BCT: age = 27.2 ± 4.4 years, body mass = 65.8 ± 5.5 kg, height = 173.3 ± 3.8 cm) or a lead-climbing training group (LCT: age = 27.7 ± 6.1 years, body mass = 70.2 ± 4.4 kg, height = 177.7 ± 4.4 cm). The groups participated in a 5-week training period consisting of 15 sessions, performing either two weekly bouldering sessions and one maintenance-session of lead-climbing (BCT) or two weekly lead-climbing sessions and one maintenance-session of bouldering (LCT). Pre- and post-training, maximal force and rate of force development (RFD) were measured during isometric pull-ups performed on a jug hold and a shallow rung, and during an isolated finger-strength test. Lead-climbing and bouldering performance were also measured, along with an intermittent forearm endurance test. The pre-to-post changes were not significantly different between the groups for any of the parameters (P = 0.062–0.710). However, both the BCT (ES = 0.30, P = 0.049) and LCT (ES = 0.41, P = 0.046) groups improved strength in the isometric pull-up performed using the jug, whereas neither group improved force in the rung condition (P = 0.054 and P = 0.084) or RFD (P = 0.060 and P = 0.070). Furthermore, climbing and bouldering performance remained unchanged in both groups (P = 0.210–0.895). The LCT group improved forearm endurance (ES = 0.55, P = 0.007), while the BCT group improved isolated finger strength (ES = 0.35, P = 0.015). In addition to isometric pull-up strength, bouldering can increase isolated finger strength while lead-climbing may improve forearm endurance. A 5-week period prioritizing one discipline can be safely implemented for advanced to intermediate climbers without risking declined performance in the non-prioritized discipline.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8100213
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81002132021-05-07 The Effects of Prioritizing Lead or Boulder Climbing Among Intermediate Climbers Stien, Nicolay Frøysaker, Tor Frithjof Hermans, Espen Vereide, Vegard Albert Andersen, Vidar Saeterbakken, Atle Hole Front Sports Act Living Sports and Active Living This study compared the effects of prioritizing lead climbing or boulder climbing on climbing-specific strength and endurance, as well as climbing performance. Fourteen active climbers were randomized to a boulder climbing training group (BCT: age = 27.2 ± 4.4 years, body mass = 65.8 ± 5.5 kg, height = 173.3 ± 3.8 cm) or a lead-climbing training group (LCT: age = 27.7 ± 6.1 years, body mass = 70.2 ± 4.4 kg, height = 177.7 ± 4.4 cm). The groups participated in a 5-week training period consisting of 15 sessions, performing either two weekly bouldering sessions and one maintenance-session of lead-climbing (BCT) or two weekly lead-climbing sessions and one maintenance-session of bouldering (LCT). Pre- and post-training, maximal force and rate of force development (RFD) were measured during isometric pull-ups performed on a jug hold and a shallow rung, and during an isolated finger-strength test. Lead-climbing and bouldering performance were also measured, along with an intermittent forearm endurance test. The pre-to-post changes were not significantly different between the groups for any of the parameters (P = 0.062–0.710). However, both the BCT (ES = 0.30, P = 0.049) and LCT (ES = 0.41, P = 0.046) groups improved strength in the isometric pull-up performed using the jug, whereas neither group improved force in the rung condition (P = 0.054 and P = 0.084) or RFD (P = 0.060 and P = 0.070). Furthermore, climbing and bouldering performance remained unchanged in both groups (P = 0.210–0.895). The LCT group improved forearm endurance (ES = 0.55, P = 0.007), while the BCT group improved isolated finger strength (ES = 0.35, P = 0.015). In addition to isometric pull-up strength, bouldering can increase isolated finger strength while lead-climbing may improve forearm endurance. A 5-week period prioritizing one discipline can be safely implemented for advanced to intermediate climbers without risking declined performance in the non-prioritized discipline. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8100213/ /pubmed/33969299 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2021.661167 Text en Copyright © 2021 Stien, Frøysaker, Hermans, Vereide, Andersen and Saeterbakken. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Sports and Active Living
Stien, Nicolay
Frøysaker, Tor Frithjof
Hermans, Espen
Vereide, Vegard Albert
Andersen, Vidar
Saeterbakken, Atle Hole
The Effects of Prioritizing Lead or Boulder Climbing Among Intermediate Climbers
title The Effects of Prioritizing Lead or Boulder Climbing Among Intermediate Climbers
title_full The Effects of Prioritizing Lead or Boulder Climbing Among Intermediate Climbers
title_fullStr The Effects of Prioritizing Lead or Boulder Climbing Among Intermediate Climbers
title_full_unstemmed The Effects of Prioritizing Lead or Boulder Climbing Among Intermediate Climbers
title_short The Effects of Prioritizing Lead or Boulder Climbing Among Intermediate Climbers
title_sort effects of prioritizing lead or boulder climbing among intermediate climbers
topic Sports and Active Living
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8100213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33969299
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2021.661167
work_keys_str_mv AT stiennicolay theeffectsofprioritizingleadorboulderclimbingamongintermediateclimbers
AT frøysakertorfrithjof theeffectsofprioritizingleadorboulderclimbingamongintermediateclimbers
AT hermansespen theeffectsofprioritizingleadorboulderclimbingamongintermediateclimbers
AT vereidevegardalbert theeffectsofprioritizingleadorboulderclimbingamongintermediateclimbers
AT andersenvidar theeffectsofprioritizingleadorboulderclimbingamongintermediateclimbers
AT saeterbakkenatlehole theeffectsofprioritizingleadorboulderclimbingamongintermediateclimbers
AT stiennicolay effectsofprioritizingleadorboulderclimbingamongintermediateclimbers
AT frøysakertorfrithjof effectsofprioritizingleadorboulderclimbingamongintermediateclimbers
AT hermansespen effectsofprioritizingleadorboulderclimbingamongintermediateclimbers
AT vereidevegardalbert effectsofprioritizingleadorboulderclimbingamongintermediateclimbers
AT andersenvidar effectsofprioritizingleadorboulderclimbingamongintermediateclimbers
AT saeterbakkenatlehole effectsofprioritizingleadorboulderclimbingamongintermediateclimbers