Cargando…
The Predation Game: Does dividing attention affect patterns of human foraging?
Attention is known to play an important role in shaping the behaviour of both human and animal foragers. Here, in three experiments, we built on previous interactive tasks to create an online foraging game for studying divided attention in human participants exposed to the (simulated) risk of predat...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8100746/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33956238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-021-00299-w |
_version_ | 1783688847489499136 |
---|---|
author | Thornton, Ian M. Tagu, Jérôme Zdravković, Sunčica Kristjánsson, Árni |
author_facet | Thornton, Ian M. Tagu, Jérôme Zdravković, Sunčica Kristjánsson, Árni |
author_sort | Thornton, Ian M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Attention is known to play an important role in shaping the behaviour of both human and animal foragers. Here, in three experiments, we built on previous interactive tasks to create an online foraging game for studying divided attention in human participants exposed to the (simulated) risk of predation. Participants used a “sheep” icon to collect items from different target categories randomly distributed across the display. Each trial also contained “wolf” objects, whose movement was inspired by classic studies of multiple object tracking. When participants needed to physically avoid the wolves, foraging patterns changed, with an increased tendency to switch between target categories and a decreased ability to prioritise high reward targets, relative to participants who could safely ignore them. However, when the wolves became dangerous by periodically changing form (briefly having big eyes) instead of by approaching the sheep, foraging patterns were unaffected. Spatial disruption caused by the need to rapidly shift position—rather the cost of reallocating attention—therefore appears to influence foraging in this context. These results thus confirm that participants can efficiently alternate between target selection and tracking moving objects, replicating earlier single-target search findings. Future studies may need to increase the perceived risk or potential costs associated with simulated danger, in order to elicit the extended run behaviour predicted by animal models of foraging, but absent in the current data. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8100746 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81007462021-05-06 The Predation Game: Does dividing attention affect patterns of human foraging? Thornton, Ian M. Tagu, Jérôme Zdravković, Sunčica Kristjánsson, Árni Cogn Res Princ Implic Original Article Attention is known to play an important role in shaping the behaviour of both human and animal foragers. Here, in three experiments, we built on previous interactive tasks to create an online foraging game for studying divided attention in human participants exposed to the (simulated) risk of predation. Participants used a “sheep” icon to collect items from different target categories randomly distributed across the display. Each trial also contained “wolf” objects, whose movement was inspired by classic studies of multiple object tracking. When participants needed to physically avoid the wolves, foraging patterns changed, with an increased tendency to switch between target categories and a decreased ability to prioritise high reward targets, relative to participants who could safely ignore them. However, when the wolves became dangerous by periodically changing form (briefly having big eyes) instead of by approaching the sheep, foraging patterns were unaffected. Spatial disruption caused by the need to rapidly shift position—rather the cost of reallocating attention—therefore appears to influence foraging in this context. These results thus confirm that participants can efficiently alternate between target selection and tracking moving objects, replicating earlier single-target search findings. Future studies may need to increase the perceived risk or potential costs associated with simulated danger, in order to elicit the extended run behaviour predicted by animal models of foraging, but absent in the current data. Springer International Publishing 2021-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8100746/ /pubmed/33956238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-021-00299-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Thornton, Ian M. Tagu, Jérôme Zdravković, Sunčica Kristjánsson, Árni The Predation Game: Does dividing attention affect patterns of human foraging? |
title | The Predation Game: Does dividing attention affect patterns of human foraging? |
title_full | The Predation Game: Does dividing attention affect patterns of human foraging? |
title_fullStr | The Predation Game: Does dividing attention affect patterns of human foraging? |
title_full_unstemmed | The Predation Game: Does dividing attention affect patterns of human foraging? |
title_short | The Predation Game: Does dividing attention affect patterns of human foraging? |
title_sort | predation game: does dividing attention affect patterns of human foraging? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8100746/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33956238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-021-00299-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thorntonianm thepredationgamedoesdividingattentionaffectpatternsofhumanforaging AT tagujerome thepredationgamedoesdividingattentionaffectpatternsofhumanforaging AT zdravkovicsuncica thepredationgamedoesdividingattentionaffectpatternsofhumanforaging AT kristjanssonarni thepredationgamedoesdividingattentionaffectpatternsofhumanforaging AT thorntonianm predationgamedoesdividingattentionaffectpatternsofhumanforaging AT tagujerome predationgamedoesdividingattentionaffectpatternsofhumanforaging AT zdravkovicsuncica predationgamedoesdividingattentionaffectpatternsofhumanforaging AT kristjanssonarni predationgamedoesdividingattentionaffectpatternsofhumanforaging |