Cargando…

Adjuvant Radiotherapy of Involved Field versus Elective Lymph Node in Patients with Operable Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer: A Single Institution Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

Background: To evaluate locoregional failure and its impact on survival by comparing involved field irradiation (IFI) with elective lymph node irradiation (ENI) for patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer who underwent post-operative radiotherapy. Methods and Materials: The enrolled patients w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Ruifeng, Zhang, Xueliang, Zhang, Qiuning, Luo, Hongtao, Wei, Shihong, Liu, Tingting, Sun, Shilong, Liu, Zhiqiang, Li, Zheng, Tian, Jinhui, Wang, Xiaohu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ivyspring International Publisher 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8100799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33976727
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.50108
_version_ 1783688855873912832
author Liu, Ruifeng
Zhang, Xueliang
Zhang, Qiuning
Luo, Hongtao
Wei, Shihong
Liu, Tingting
Sun, Shilong
Liu, Zhiqiang
Li, Zheng
Tian, Jinhui
Wang, Xiaohu
author_facet Liu, Ruifeng
Zhang, Xueliang
Zhang, Qiuning
Luo, Hongtao
Wei, Shihong
Liu, Tingting
Sun, Shilong
Liu, Zhiqiang
Li, Zheng
Tian, Jinhui
Wang, Xiaohu
author_sort Liu, Ruifeng
collection PubMed
description Background: To evaluate locoregional failure and its impact on survival by comparing involved field irradiation (IFI) with elective lymph node irradiation (ENI) for patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer who underwent post-operative radiotherapy. Methods and Materials: The enrolled patients were randomized allocated to IFI or ENI group. CTV of IFI was generated according to pre-operative primary tumor location and post-operative pathological characters and positive LNs regions. CTV of ENI was generated according to pre-operative tumor position to administer selective lymph node irradiation. Radiotherapy planning was delivered using either 3D-CRT or IMRT. Results: A total of 57 patients were enrolled, 28 patients in ENI group and 29 patients in IFI group. There were not statistical differences between two groups in baseline (p>0.05). The initial locoregional failure rate was 17.9 % in ENI arm and 20.7% in IFI arm respectively (p=0.085). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year Progression-free Survival (PFS) were 63.2, 43.5, and 21.8 % in ENI arm versus 78.2, 60.1, and 55.1% in IFI arm (p =0.038). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) were 78.6, 46.9, and 23.5 % in ENI arm versus 72.9, 59.7, and 54.3 % in IFI arm (p=0.06). Acute radiation pneumonitis (p=0.005) and hematological toxicities (p =0.029) also showed statistical differences between groups, ENI arm was more than IFI arm. Conclusions: The results indicated that IFI tended to improve survival and reduce toxicities for patients with operative ESCC and did not increase locoregional failure compared to ENI. It is thus suggested that IFI for ESCC PORT is worthy of clinical recommendation and further study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8100799
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Ivyspring International Publisher
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81007992021-05-10 Adjuvant Radiotherapy of Involved Field versus Elective Lymph Node in Patients with Operable Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer: A Single Institution Prospective Randomized Controlled Study Liu, Ruifeng Zhang, Xueliang Zhang, Qiuning Luo, Hongtao Wei, Shihong Liu, Tingting Sun, Shilong Liu, Zhiqiang Li, Zheng Tian, Jinhui Wang, Xiaohu J Cancer Research Paper Background: To evaluate locoregional failure and its impact on survival by comparing involved field irradiation (IFI) with elective lymph node irradiation (ENI) for patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer who underwent post-operative radiotherapy. Methods and Materials: The enrolled patients were randomized allocated to IFI or ENI group. CTV of IFI was generated according to pre-operative primary tumor location and post-operative pathological characters and positive LNs regions. CTV of ENI was generated according to pre-operative tumor position to administer selective lymph node irradiation. Radiotherapy planning was delivered using either 3D-CRT or IMRT. Results: A total of 57 patients were enrolled, 28 patients in ENI group and 29 patients in IFI group. There were not statistical differences between two groups in baseline (p>0.05). The initial locoregional failure rate was 17.9 % in ENI arm and 20.7% in IFI arm respectively (p=0.085). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year Progression-free Survival (PFS) were 63.2, 43.5, and 21.8 % in ENI arm versus 78.2, 60.1, and 55.1% in IFI arm (p =0.038). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) were 78.6, 46.9, and 23.5 % in ENI arm versus 72.9, 59.7, and 54.3 % in IFI arm (p=0.06). Acute radiation pneumonitis (p=0.005) and hematological toxicities (p =0.029) also showed statistical differences between groups, ENI arm was more than IFI arm. Conclusions: The results indicated that IFI tended to improve survival and reduce toxicities for patients with operative ESCC and did not increase locoregional failure compared to ENI. It is thus suggested that IFI for ESCC PORT is worthy of clinical recommendation and further study. Ivyspring International Publisher 2021-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8100799/ /pubmed/33976727 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.50108 Text en © The author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). See http://ivyspring.com/terms for full terms and conditions.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Liu, Ruifeng
Zhang, Xueliang
Zhang, Qiuning
Luo, Hongtao
Wei, Shihong
Liu, Tingting
Sun, Shilong
Liu, Zhiqiang
Li, Zheng
Tian, Jinhui
Wang, Xiaohu
Adjuvant Radiotherapy of Involved Field versus Elective Lymph Node in Patients with Operable Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer: A Single Institution Prospective Randomized Controlled Study
title Adjuvant Radiotherapy of Involved Field versus Elective Lymph Node in Patients with Operable Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer: A Single Institution Prospective Randomized Controlled Study
title_full Adjuvant Radiotherapy of Involved Field versus Elective Lymph Node in Patients with Operable Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer: A Single Institution Prospective Randomized Controlled Study
title_fullStr Adjuvant Radiotherapy of Involved Field versus Elective Lymph Node in Patients with Operable Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer: A Single Institution Prospective Randomized Controlled Study
title_full_unstemmed Adjuvant Radiotherapy of Involved Field versus Elective Lymph Node in Patients with Operable Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer: A Single Institution Prospective Randomized Controlled Study
title_short Adjuvant Radiotherapy of Involved Field versus Elective Lymph Node in Patients with Operable Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer: A Single Institution Prospective Randomized Controlled Study
title_sort adjuvant radiotherapy of involved field versus elective lymph node in patients with operable esophageal squamous cell cancer: a single institution prospective randomized controlled study
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8100799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33976727
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.50108
work_keys_str_mv AT liuruifeng adjuvantradiotherapyofinvolvedfieldversuselectivelymphnodeinpatientswithoperableesophagealsquamouscellcancerasingleinstitutionprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT zhangxueliang adjuvantradiotherapyofinvolvedfieldversuselectivelymphnodeinpatientswithoperableesophagealsquamouscellcancerasingleinstitutionprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT zhangqiuning adjuvantradiotherapyofinvolvedfieldversuselectivelymphnodeinpatientswithoperableesophagealsquamouscellcancerasingleinstitutionprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT luohongtao adjuvantradiotherapyofinvolvedfieldversuselectivelymphnodeinpatientswithoperableesophagealsquamouscellcancerasingleinstitutionprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT weishihong adjuvantradiotherapyofinvolvedfieldversuselectivelymphnodeinpatientswithoperableesophagealsquamouscellcancerasingleinstitutionprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT liutingting adjuvantradiotherapyofinvolvedfieldversuselectivelymphnodeinpatientswithoperableesophagealsquamouscellcancerasingleinstitutionprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT sunshilong adjuvantradiotherapyofinvolvedfieldversuselectivelymphnodeinpatientswithoperableesophagealsquamouscellcancerasingleinstitutionprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT liuzhiqiang adjuvantradiotherapyofinvolvedfieldversuselectivelymphnodeinpatientswithoperableesophagealsquamouscellcancerasingleinstitutionprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT lizheng adjuvantradiotherapyofinvolvedfieldversuselectivelymphnodeinpatientswithoperableesophagealsquamouscellcancerasingleinstitutionprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT tianjinhui adjuvantradiotherapyofinvolvedfieldversuselectivelymphnodeinpatientswithoperableesophagealsquamouscellcancerasingleinstitutionprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT wangxiaohu adjuvantradiotherapyofinvolvedfieldversuselectivelymphnodeinpatientswithoperableesophagealsquamouscellcancerasingleinstitutionprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy